Decision support for prioritising of land to be preserved for agriculture: Can participatory tool development help?

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 208-220

  Kerselaers, Eva ^a   Rogge, Elke ^a,b   Lauwers, Ludwig ^a,b   Van Huylenbroeck, Guido ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Belgium; Farmland preservation; Flanders; Implementation gap; Participatory tool development; Spatial multicriteria decision analysis

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINES; DECISION THEORY; RURAL AREAS;

BELGIUM; FLANDERS; IMPLEMENTATION GAP; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; TOOL DEVELOPMENT;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PRIORITIZATION; RURAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER; URBANIZATION;

BELGIUM; FLANDERS;

EID: 84949129833     PISSN: 01681699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2014.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Akinci H., Özalp A., Turgut B. Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2013, 97:71-82.
2. Alkan Olsson J., Andersson L. Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management. Water Resour. Manage. 2007, 21:97-110.
3. Arnette A., Zobel C., Bosch D., Pease J., Metcalfe T. Stakeholder ranking of watershed goals with the vector analytic hierarchy process: effects of participant grouping scenarios. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:1459-1469.
4. Barnaud C., Le Page C., Dumrongrojwatthana P., Trébuil G. Spatial representations are not neutral: lessons from a participatory agent-based modelling process in a land-use conflict. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 45:150-159.
5. Calus M., Van Huylenbroeck G., Van Lierde D. The relationship between farm succession and farm assets on Belgian farms. Sociol. Ruralis 2008, 48(1):38-56.
6. De Meyer A., Estrella R., Jacxsens P., Deckers J., Van Rompaey A., Van Orshoven J. A conceptual framework and its software implementation to generate spatial decision support systems for land use planning. Land Use Policy 2013, 35:271-282.
7. Defra, 2003. Agricultural land classification. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, <>. http://www.defra.gov.uk/farm/environment/land-use/pdf/alcleaflet.pdf.
8. Dujmovic J., De Tré G., Van de Weghe N. Suitability maps based on the LSP method. MDAI 2008, LNAI 5285 2008, 15-25. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. V. Torra, Y. Narukawa (Eds.).
9. EC, 2013. Website of the European Commission <> (accessed 04.11.13). http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our-activities/support-for-member-states/lpis-iacs.html.
10. ESRI ArcView 10 2010, Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, CA.
11. FAO Land Evaluation. Towards a Revised Framework 2007, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
12. Gaddis E., Falk H., Ginger C., Voinov A. Effectiveness of a participatory modeling effort to identify and advance community water resource goals in St. Albans, Vermont. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:1428-1438.
13. García J., Alvarado A., Blanco J., Jiménez E., Maldonado A., Cortés G. Multi-attribute evaluation and selection of sites for agricultural product warehouses based on an Analytic Hierarchy Process. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2014, 100:60-69.
14. Geneletti D. A GIS-based decision support system to identify nature conservation priorities in an alpine valley. Land Use Policy 2004, 21:149-160.
15. Gilliams S., Raymaekers D., Muys B., Van Orshoven J. Comparing multiple criteria decision methods to extend a geographical information system on afforestation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2005, 49:142-158.
16. Hajkowicz S., Higgins A. A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 184:255-265.
17. Hoobler B., Vance G., Hamerlinck J., Munn L., Hayward J. Applications of land evaluation and site assessment (LESA) and a geographic information system (GIS) in East Park County, Wyoming. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2003, 58(2):105-112.
18. Hulme, T., Grosskopf, T., Hidle, J., 2002. Agricultural Land Classification. Agfact AC.25 NSW Agriculture, Wagga Wagga, 15 pp. <>. http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/189697/ag-land-classification.pdf.
19. Hyman J., Leibowitz S. A general framework for prioritizing land units for ecological protection and restoration. Environ. Manage. 2000, 25(1):23-35.
20. Jakku E., Thorburn P. A conceptual framework for guiding the participatory development of agricultural decision support systems. Agric. Syst. 2010, 103:675-682.
21. Jankowski P. Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90(3):1966-1971.
22. Joerin F., Thériault M., Musy A. Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Sci. 2001, 15(2):153-174.
23. Keeney R., Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs 1976, Wiley, New York, 569 pp.
24. Kerselaers, E., 2012. Participatory Development of a Land Value Assessment Tool for Agriculture to Support Rural Planning in Flanders. PhD-Thesis. Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 259 pp.
25. Kerselaers E., Rogge E., Dessein J., Lauwers L., Van Huylenbroeck G. Prioritising land to be preserved for agriculture: a context-specific value tree. Land Use Policy 2011, 28:219-226.
26. Kerselaers E., Rogge E., Vanempten E., Lauwers L., Van Huylenbroeck G. Changing land use in the countryside: Stakeholders' perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in Flanders. Land Use Policy 2013, 23:197-206.
27. Koomen E., Dekkers J., van Dijk T. Open-space preservation in the Netherlands: planning, practice and prospects. Land Use Policy 2008, 25:361-377.
28. Lichtenberg E., Ding C. Assessing farmland protection policy in China. Land Use Policy 2008, 25:59-68.
29. Lynch T., Gregor S. User participation in decision support systems development: influencing system outcomes. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2004, 13:286-301.
30. Macaulay, 2002. Macaulay Land Capability for Agriculture. Macaulay Land Use Research Institute <>. http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/explorescotland/lcfa1.html.
31. Malczewski J. GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis 1999, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 392 pp.
32. Messely L., Rogge E., Dessein J. Using the rural web in dialogue with regional stakeholders. J. Rural Studies 2013, 32:400-410.
33. Messner F., Zwirner O., Karkuschke M. Participation in multi-criteria decision support for the resolution of a water allocation problem in the Spree River basin. Land Use Policy 2006, 23:63-75.
34. Nekhay O., Arriaza M., Guzmán-Álvarez J. Spatial analysis of the suitability of olive plantations for wildlife habitat restoration. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2009, 65:49-64.
35. Oltmer, K., 2003. Agricultural Policy, Land Use and Environmental Effects. Studies in Quantitative Research Synthesis. PhD. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 193 pp.
36. Rogge E., Dessein J., Verhoeve A. The organisation of complexity: a set of five components to organize the social interface of rural policy making. Land Use Policy 2013, 35:329-340.
37. Rossi V., Salinari F., Poni S., Caffi T., Bettati T. Addressing the implementation problem in agricultural decision support systems: the example of vite.net®. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2014, 100:88-99.
38. Saaty T. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York, 287 pp.
39. Santé-Riveira I., Crecente-Maseda R., Miranda-Barrós D. GIS-based planning support system for rural land-use allocation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2008, 63:257-273.
40. Sieber R. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2006, 96(3):491-507.
41. Store R. Sustainable locating of different forest uses. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:610-618.
42. Tan R., Beckmann V., van den Berg L., Qu F. Governing farmland conversion: comparing China with the Netherlands and Germany. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:961-974.
43. Te Brömmelstroet M., Schrijnen P. From planning support systems to mediated planning support: a structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 2010, 37:3-20.
44. Thompson A., Prokopy L. Tracking urban sprawl: Using spatial data to inform farmland preservation policy. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:194-202.
45. Van Herzele A., van Woerkum C. On the argumentative work of map-based visualisation. Landscape Urban Plann. 2011, 100(4):396-399.
46. Van Huylenbroeck, G., 1989. Evaluatie van ruilverkavelingen met behulp van multicriteria-analyse. (Evaluation of land consolidation projects with multi criteria analysis.) PhD. Ghent University, Gent, 284 pp. (In Dutch).
47. Van Meensel J., Lauwers L., Kempen I., Dessein J., Van Huylenbroeck G. Effect of a participatory approach on the successful development of agricultural decision support systems: the case of Pigs2win. Decis. Support Syst. 2012, 54:164-172.
48. VLM, 2006. Agricultural Land Use Data Collected by the Flemish Land Agency.
49. Voinov A., Bousquet F. Modelling with stakeholders. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:1268-1281.
50. von Winterfeldt D., Edwards E. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research 1986, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 604 pp.
51. Vonk G., Geertman S., Schot P. Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environ. Plann. A 2005, 37:909-924.
52. Wang X., Zhenrong Y., Cinderby S., Forrester J. Enhancing participation: experiences of participatory geographic information systems in Shanxi Province, China. Appl. Geogr. 2008, 28:96-109.
53. Wolsink M. Reshaping the Dutch planning system: a learning process?. Environ. Plann. A 2003, 35:705-723.
54. Wright L., Zitzmann W., Young K., Googins R. LESA - Agricultural land evaluation and site assessment. A new approach to decisions about protecting agricultural land. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1983, 38(2):82-86.