Reshaping the Dutch planning system: A learning process?

Environment and Planning A

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 705-723

  Wolsink, Maarten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; PLANNING SYSTEM; SPATIAL PLANNING;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 0038669292     PISSN: 0308518X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/a35173     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aarts J H W M, Huigen J, van der Rijdt D H, 1995, "Snelheid van uitvoering onder tracéwet: op weg naar een pervertering van de verhouding tussen Rijksoverheid en medeoverheden?" [Speed of executing works under the Bill of Trajectories: towards perverting the relations between the national government and the other authorities?] Bestuurswetenschappen 4 278-292
2. Arnstein S R, 1969, "A ladder of citizen participation" Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 216-224
3. Brockner J, Rubin J Z, 1985 Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts (Springer, New York)
4. Burningham K, 2000, "Using the language of NIMBY: a topic for research, not an activity for researchers" Local Environment 5 55-67
5. Castells M, 1996 The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell, Oxford)
6. Dear M, 1992, "Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome" Journal of the American Planning Association 58 288-300
7. de Jong P, Wolsink M, 1997, "The structure of the Dutch waste sector and impediments for waste reduction" Waste Management and Research 14 641-658
8. Devilee J L A, 2002 Decision Making about Waste Facilities. An Analysis of Reactions of Local Residents in a Risk Society PhD thesis, Department of Geography and Planning, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
9. Donkers H, 2000, "Zand over het Nimby-wetje" [Let's forget the Nimby-bill] NRC Handlesblad 20 September, page 18
10. Eberg J, van Est R, van de Graaf H (Eds), 1996 Leren met Beleid: Beleidsverandering en Beleidsgericht Leren bij Nimby-, Milieu-, en technologiebeleid [Learning skilfully: policy change and policy oriented learning in nimby, environmental, and technology policy] (Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam)
11. Edelenbos J, 2000 Proces in vorm: procesbegeleiding van interactive beleidsvorming over lokale ruimtelijke projecten [The shape of the process: process supervision in interactive decision making in local and spatial projects] (Lemma, Utrecht)
12. Faludi A, van der Valk A, 1994 Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century (Kluwer, Dordrecht)
13. Flyvbjerg B, Holm M S, Buhl S, 2002, "Underestimating costs in public works projects-error or lie?" Journal of the American Planning Association 68 279-295
14. Freudenburg W R, Pastor S K, 1992, "Nimbys and lulus: stalking the syndromes" Journal of Social Issues 48 39-61
15. Gibbs D, 2000, "Ecological modernization, regional economic development and regional development agencies" Geoforum 31 9-19
16. Graham S, Marvin S, 2001 Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (Routledge, London)
17. Hajer M, Zonneveld W, 2000, "Spatial planning in the network society-rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands" European Planning Studies 8 337-355
18. Healey P, 1997 Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Macmillan, London)
19. Healey P, 1998, "Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning" Environment and Planning A 30 1531-1546
20. Hermans Committee, 1995 Rapport Commissie Betuweroute [Report of the Betuwe-track Committee] Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment and Ministry of Transport and Public Works, The Hague
21. Huigen J, 1996, "Anti-NIMBY wetgeving als leergedrag en als instrument voor leergedrag" [Anti-nimby legislation as learning behaviour and as tool for learning behaviour], in Leren met beleid. Beleidsverandering en beleidsgericht leren bij nimby-, milieu-, en technologiebeleid Eds J Eberg, R van Est, H van de Graaf (Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam) pp 41-57
22. Huigen J, Frissen P H A, Tops P W, 1993 Het project Betuweroute: spoorlijn of bestuurlijke co-produktie? [The Betuwe-track project: rail track or governmental coproduction?] (Katholic University Brabant, Tilburg)
23. Hunter S, Leyden K M, 1995, "Beyond NIMBY: explaining opposition to hazardous waste facilities" Policy Studies Journal 23 601-619
24. Innes J, Booher D E, 1999, "Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning" Journal of the American Planning Association 65 412-423
25. Klijn E H, Koppenjan J F M, 2000, "Politicians and interactive decision making: institutional spoilsports or playmakers" Public Administration 78 365-387
26. Korthals Altes W K, 1995 De Nederlandse planningdoctrine in het fin de siècle. Ervaringen met voorbereiding en doorwerking van de Vierde nota (Extra) [The Dutch planning doctrine in end of the century: experiences with the preparation and the carry-over of the Fourth National Physical Planning Report (Extra)] (Van Gorcum, Assen)
27. Korthals Altes W K, 2002, "Local government and the decentralisation of urban regeneration policies in the Netherlands" Urban Studies 39 1439-1452
28. Kuhn R G, Ballard K R, 1998, "Canadian innovations in siting hazardous waste management facilities" Environmental Management 22 533-545
29. Lake R W, 1993, "Rethinking NIMBY" Journal of the American Planning Association 59 87-93
30. Lake R W, 1996, "Volunteers, NIMBYS, and environmental justice: dilemmas of democratic practice" Antipode 28 160-174
31. Lawrence D P, 2000, "Planning theories and environmental impact assessment" Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20 607-625
32. Lindblom C E, 1968 The Policy-making Process (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
33. Lok J A, 1993, "Nimby-wetgeving: Geen evenwichtige afweging van belangen" [Nimby-legislation: no balanced weighing of interests] Rooilijn 26 108-115
34. Luloff A E, Albrecht S L, Bourke S, 1998, "Nimby and the hazardous and toxic waste siting dilemma: the need for concept clarification" Society and Natural Resources 11 81-89
35. McAvoy G E, 1998, "Partisan probing and democratic decisionmaking: rethinking the Nimby syndrome" Policy Studies 26 274-292
36. McGuirk P M, 2001, "Situating communicative planning theory: context, power, and knowledge" Environment and Planning A 33 195-217
37. Pateman C, 1970 Participation and Democratic Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
38. Pendall R, 1999, "Opposition to housing: NIMBY and beyond" Urban Affairs Review 35 112-136
39. Phelps N A, Tewdwr-Jones M, 2000, "Scratching the surface of collaborative and associative governance: identifying the diversity of social action in institutional capacity building" Environment and Planning A 32 111-130
40. Piat M, 2000, "The NIMBY phenomenon; community residents' concerns about housing for deinstitutionalized people" Health and Social Work 25 127-138
41. Rekenkamer, 2000 Beleidsinformatie Betuweroute [Policy information on Betuwe-track] Auditor General, Rekenkamer, The Hague
42. Repper J, Brooker C, 1996, "Public attitudes towards mental health facilities in the community" Health and Social Care in the Community 4 290-299
43. Rijkswaterstaat, 1997 Open keuken: zoektocht naar methoden voor interactive procesaanpak [Open kitchen: a quest for methods for an approach of interactive processes] Rijkswaterstaat Department of Public Works, Infraplan, Den Haag
44. Rivierdijken Committee, 1977 Rapport Commissie Rivierdijken [Report of the River Dikes Committee] Ministry of Transport and Public Works, The Hague
45. Roskam Abbing M, 2000, "Beleidsramp Betuweroute" [Policy disaster of Betuwe-track] Agora number 2, 16-19
46. Rousseau J J, 1968 The Social Contract Ed. M Cranston (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
47. RV & W, 1998 Ambities bundelen: Advies over de inpassing van infrastructuur [Combining ambitions: advice on the fitting-in of infrastructure] Council for Transport and Public Works, Raad voor Verkeer en Waterstaat, The Hague
48. Saarikoski H, 2000, "Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process" Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20 681-700
49. Sabatier P A, 1998, "The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe" Journal of European Public Policy 5 98-130
50. Sabatier P A, Jenkins-Smith H C, 1999, "The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment", in Theories of the Policy Process Ed. P A Sabatier (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 117-166
51. Schattschneider E E, 1960 The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York)
52. Schlager E, 1999, "A comparison of frameworks, theories and models of policy processes", in Theories of the Policy Process Ed. P A Sabatier (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 233-260
53. Schlager E, Blomquist W, 1996, "A comparison of three emerging theories of the policy process" Political Research Quarterly 49 651-672
54. Siddiqui F, 1996, "Een duistere club: de lobby achter de Betuwelijn" [An obscure gang: the lobby behind the Betuwe-track] Intermediair 32(51) 6-15
55. van Baren N G E, 2000 Planhiërarchische oplossingen: een bron voor maatschappelijk verzet [Hierarchical solutions in planning: a source of resistance in society] PhD thesis, Department of Geography and Planning, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
56. van den Hoek A, 1998 De effectiviteit van interactieve planvormingsprocessen: een eerste beoordeling [Effectiveness of interactive decision making processes: a first assessment] (Rijkswaterstaat Infraplan, The Hague)
57. van der Heijden A C P M, 1998 De locatie gekozen: Milieu-aspecten bij de locatiekeuze van afvalstortplaatsen [The location chosen: environmental aspects in the choice of locations of waste landfills] PhD thesis, Faculty of Policy Studies, Katholic University Nijmegen
58. van Eeten M J G, 2001, "Recasting intractable policy issues: the wider implications of the Netherlands civil aviation controversy" Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 391-414
59. van Ierland E, Graveland C, Huiberts R, 2000, "An environmental economic analysis of the new rail link to European main port Rotterdam" Transportation Research D - Transport and Environment 5 197-209
60. van Roode G, Mostert E, 1998, "River basin management in the Dutch Mark basin", River Basin Administration Report 9, Delft University of Technology, Delft
61. van Waarden F, 1992, "Dimensions and types of policy networks" European Journal of Political Science 21 29-52
62. van Zundert J W, 1990 Het Bestemmingsplan: Een juridisch-bestuurlijke inleiding in de ruimtelijke ordening [The Zoning Scheme: a juridical and governmental introduction in spatial planning] 6th edition (Samsom HD Tjeenk Willink, Alphen aan den Rijn)
63. Voogd H, Woltjer J, 1999, "The communicative ideology in spatial planning: some critical reflections based on the Dutch experience" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26 835-854
64. VROM, 2001 Voorontwerp voor een Wet ruimtelijke ordening (Wro) Memorie van Toelichting [Draft of a Spatial Planning Act: explanatory notes] Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague
65. V and W, 1995 Transport in Balans [Transport in balance] Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Ministry of Transport and Public Works, The Hague
66. Weston J, 2002, "From Pool to Fulham: a changing culture in the UK environmental impact assessment decision making?" Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45 425-443
67. Wiering M A, Driessen P P J, 2001, "Beyond the art of diking: interactive policy on river management in the Netherlands" Water Policy 3 283-296
68. Wolsink M, 1994, "Entanglement of interests and motives: assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on facility siting" Urban Studies 31 851-866
69. Wolsink M, 2000, "Wind power and the NIMBY-myth. Institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support" Renewable Energy 21 49-64
70. Wolsink M, de Jong P, 2001, "Waste sector structure: institutional capacity for planning waste reduction" Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92 148-163
71. WRR, 1994, "Besluiten over grote projecten" [Decisionmaking on large projects] Rapporten aan de Regering 46, Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (Sdu, The Hague)
72. WRR, 1999 Spatial Development Policy Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy, Reports to the Government 53 (Sdu, The Hague)
73. Zeiss C, Lefsrud L, 1996, "Making or breaking waste facility siting successes with a siting framework' Environmental Management 20 53-64