Live as we choose: The role of autonomy support in facilitating intrinsic motivation

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 441-447

  Meng, Liang ^a,b,c   Ma, Qingguo ^a,b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Choice; Event related potentials; Feedback related negativity; Intrinsic motivation; Self determination Theory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEEDBACK RELATED NEGATIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; SATISFACTION; SELF CONCEPT; SELF DETERMINATION THEORY; THEORY; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUESTIONNAIRE; YOUNG ADULT;

BRAIN MAPPING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84949111809     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Albrecht K., Abeler J., Weber B., Falk A. The brain correlates of the effects of monetary and verbal rewards on intrinsic motivation. Front. Neurosci. 2014, 8:1-10. 10.3389/fnins.2014.00303.
2. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control 1997, W. H. Freeman.
3. Bocker K.B.E., Brunia C.H.M., Van den Berg-Lenssen M.M.C. A spatiotemporal dipole model of the stimulus preceding negativity (SPN) prior to feedback stimuli. Brain Topogr. 1994, 7:71-88. 10.1007/BF01184839.
4. Brunia C.H.M., Hackley S.A., van Boxtel G.J.M., Kotani Y., Ohgami Y. Waiting to perceive: reward or punishment?. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2011, 122:858-868. 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.12.039.
5. Cerasoli C.P., Nicklin J.M., Ford M.T. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: a 40-year meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2014, 140:980-1008. 10.1037/a0035661.
6. Deci E.L. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1971, 18:105-115. 10.1037/h0030644.
7. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 2000, 11:227-268. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
8. Deci E.L., Koestner R., Ryan R.M. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125:627-668. (discussion 692-700). 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.
9. Donkers F.C.L., Nieuwenhuis S., Van Boxtel G.J.M. Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 25:777-787. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.007.
10. Foti D., Hajcak G. Genetic variation in dopamine moderates neural response during reward anticipation and delivery: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 2012, 49:617-626. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01343.x.
11. Fuentemilla L., Cucurell D., Marco-Pallarés J., Guitart-Masip M., Morís J., Rodríguez-Fornells A. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipating improbable but desired events. NeuroImage 2013, 78:135-144. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.062.
12. Gehring W.J., Willoughby A.R. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002, 295:2279-2282. 10.1126/science.1066893.
13. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G.H. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Rev. 2002, 109:679-709. 10.1037//0033-295X.109.4.679.
14. Humphrey S.E., Nahrgang J.D., Morgeson F.P. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J. Appl. Psychol. 2007, 92:1332-1356. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332.
15. Kazdin A.E. Imagery elaboration and self-efficacy in the covert modeling treatment of unassertive behavior. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1979, 47:725-733. 10.1037/0022-006X.47.4.725.
16. L'Engle M. Walking on Water: Reflections on Faith and Art 2001, WaterBrook Press.
17. Langer E.J. The illusion of control. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1975, 32:311-328. 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311.
18. Leotti L.A., Iyengar S.S., Ochsner K.N. Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:457-463. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001.
19. Ma Q., Jin J., Meng L., Shen Q. The dark side of monetary incentive: how does extrinsic reward crowd out intrinsic motivation. Neuroreport 2014, 25:194-198. 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000113.
20. Ma Q., Meng L., Shen Q. You have my word: reciprocity expectation modulates feedback-related negativity in the trust game. PLoS One 2015, 10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0119129.
21. Ma Q., Meng L., Wang L., Shen Q. I endeavor to make it: effort increases valuation of subsequent monetary reward. Behav. Brain Res. 2014, 261:1-7. 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.045.
22. Ma Q., Meng L., Zhang Z., Xu Q., Wang Y., Shen Q. You did not mean it: perceived good intentions alleviate sense of unfairness. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2015, 96:183-190.
23. Marsden K.E., Ma W.J., Deci E.L., Ryan R.M., Chiu P.H. Diminished neural responses predict enhanced intrinsic motivation and sensitivity to external incentive. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2014, 10.3758/s13415-014-0324-5.
24. Masaki H., Yamazaki K., Hackley S.A. Stimulus-preceding negativity is modulated by action-outcome contingency. Neuroreport 2010, 21:277-281. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283360bc3.
25. Murayama K., Matsumoto M., Izuma K., Matsumoto K. Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:20911-20916. 10.1073/pnas.1013305107.
26. Patall E.A., Cooper H., Robinson J.C. The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychol. Bull. 2008, 134:270-300. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270.
27. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: the motivational basis for effective change. Can. Psychol. 2008, 49:186-193. 10.1037/a0012753.
28. San Martín R. Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:304. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00304.
29. Swanson S.D., Tricomi E. Effects of intrinsic motivation on feedback processing during learning. NeuroImage 2015, 119:175-186.
30. Tricomi E., Delgado M.R., McCandliss B.D., McClelland J.L., Fiez J.A. Performance feedback drives caudate activation in a phonological learning task. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1029-1043. 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.1029.
31. Tricomi E.M., Delgado M.R., Fiez J.A. Modulation of caudate activity by action contingency. Neuron 2004, 41:281-292. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00848-1.
32. Yeung N., Holroyd C.B., Cohen J.D. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:535-544. 10.1093/cercor/bhh153.
33. Zhou Z., Yu R., Zhou X. To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3606-3613. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.010.
34. Zuckerman M., Porac J., Lathin D. On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically-motivated behavior. J. Compos. Mater. 1999, 33:928-940. (doi:0803973233).