Establishing Environmental Water Requirements for the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia's Largest Developed River System

River Research and Applications

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1153-1165

  Swirepik, J L ^a   Burns, I C ^b   Dyer, F J ^c   Neave, I A ^a   O'Brien, M G ^a   Pryde, G M ^a   Thompson, R M ^c  

^a Murray Darling Basin Authority   (Australia)

^b MURRAY DARLING FRESHWATER RESEARCH CENTRE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

Author keywords

environmental flows; environmental water requirements; flow management; flow restoration; hydrology; Murray Darling Basin; umbrella environmental asset

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; RIVER BASIN; RIVER FLOW; RIVER MANAGEMENT; RIVER SYSTEM;

AUSTRALIA; MURRAY-DARLING BASIN;

AVES;

EID: 84949057551     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.2975     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ABS. 2013. Agricultural Census, 2010–11. Australian Bureau of Statistics. URL 7121.0 - Agricultural Commodities, Australia, 2010–11 [accessed 18 June 2015].
2. Acreman M, Dunbar MJ. 2004. Defining environmental river flow requirements—a review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 8: 861–876. DOI:10.5194/hess-8-861-2004.
3. Acreman MC, Ferguson AJD. 2010. Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive. Freshwater Biology 55: 32–48. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02181.x.
4. Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ. 2006. The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications 16: 1311–1318. DOI:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:tcopef]2.0.co;2.
5. Boates JS, Fenton MB. 2011. Flagship species—flagship problems: recovery of species at risk and the conservation of biodiversity in Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 89: 369–370. DOI:10.1139/z11-020.
6. Bonada N, Rieradevall M, Prat N. 2007. Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia 589: 91–106. DOI:10.1007/s10750-007-0723-5.
7. Bren LJ. 1988. Effects of river regulation on flooding of a riparian red gum forest on the River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 2: 65–77. DOI:10.1002/rrr.3450020202.
8. Brooks S, Cottingham P, Butcher R, Hale J. 2014. Murray–Darling Basin aquatic ecosystem classification: stage 2 report. Peter Cottingham & Associates report to the Commonwealth Environmental Water Office and Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/d6a98692-cd31-49f8-bfc9-0012408daf01/files/interim-classification-aquatic-ecosystems-mdb.pdf [accessed 12 March 2015].
9. Buchanan C, Moltz HLN, Haywood HC, Palmer JB, Griggs AN. 2013. A test of the ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA) method for determining environmental flows in the Potomac River basin, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 58: 2632–2647. DOI:10.1111/fwb.12240.
10. Bunn SE, Bond NR, Davis JA, Gawne B, Kennard MJ, King AJ, Kingsford RT, Koehn JD, Linke S, Olley JM, Peterson EE, Pollino CA, Sheldon F, Sims NC, Thompson RM, Ward D, Watts RJ. 2014. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes. Synthesis Report. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country, Clayton, Melbourne. 62p. https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/download?pid=csiro:EP148472&dsid=DS4 [accessed 17 June 2015].
11. Campbell IC. 2007. Perceptions, data, and river management: lessons from the Mekong River. Water Resources Research 43: W02407. DOI:10.1029/2006wr005130.
12. Castella E, Bickerton MA, Armitage PD, Petts GE. 1995. The effects of water abstractions on invertebrate communities in UK streams. Hydrobiologia 308: 167–182. DOI:10.1007/bf00006869.
13. COAG. 2004. Intergovernmental agreement on a National Water Initiative. http://www.environment.gov.au/topics/water/australian-government-water-leadership/national-water-initiative [accessed 12 March 2015].
14. CSIRO. 2008. Water availability in the Murray. A report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Murray-Darling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. CSIRO, Australia. http://www.csiro.au/Organisation-Structure/Flagships/Water-for-a-Healthy-Country-Flagship/Sustainable-Yields-Projects/MurrayReportMDBSY.aspx [accessed 12 March 2015].
15. Cunningham SC, White M, Griffioen P, Newell G, Mac Nally R. 2013. Mapping floodplain vegetation types across the Murray–Darling Basin using remote sensing. Report prepared for the Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. http://www.mdba.gov.au/kid/files/Cunningham et al Floodplain Veg Types Report Nov 2013 REVISION.docx [accessed 18 June 2015].
16. Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. 2008. National framework and guidance for describing the ecological character of Australian Ramsar wetlands. Module 2 of the national guidelines for Ramsar wetlands — implementing the Ramsar Convention in Australia. http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/6d7408dc-2519-4294-9820-f7b2284816dd/files/module-2-framework.pdf [accessed 12 March 2015].
17. Eastburn DR, Mackay N. 1990. In The Murray, Mackay N, Eastburn D (eds). Murray Darling Basin Commission: Canberra.
18. Hughes DA. 2001. Providing hydrological information and data analysis tools for the determination of ecological instream flow requirements for South African rivers. Journal of Hydrology 241: 140–151. DOI:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00378-4.
19. Kendy E, Sanderson JS, Olden JD, Apse CD, DePhilip MM, Haney JA, Zimmerman JKH. 2009. Applications of the ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA) in the United States. In Proceedings from the International Conference on Implementing Environmental Water Allocations, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, pp. 23–26. https://services.oregon.gov/owrd/docs/SB839/2009_Kendy_ELOHA_apps.pdf [accessed 18 June 2015].
20. Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ, Olden JD, MacKay SJ, Stein JL, Marsh N. 2010. Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management. Freshwater Biology 55: 171–193. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02307.x.
21. Lambeck RJ. 1997. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology 11: 849–856. DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96319.x.
22. Leigh C, Bush A, Harrison ET, Ho SS, Luke L, Rolls RJ, Ledger ME. 2014. Ecological effects of extreme climatic events on riverine ecosystems: insights from Australia. Freshwater Biology. DOI:10.1111/fwb.12515.
23. Leslie DJ. 2001. Effect of river management on colonially-nesting waterbirds in the Barmah–Millewa Forest, South-Eastern Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17: 21–36. DOI:10.1002/1099-1646(200101/02).
24. Likens GE, Walker KF, Davies PE, Brookes J, Olley J, Young WJ, Thoms MC, Lake PS, Gawne B, Davis J, Arthington AH, Thompson R, Oliver RL. 2009. Ecosystem science: toward a new paradigm for managing Australia's inland aquatic ecosystems. Marine and Freshwater Research 60: 271–279. DOI:10.1071/mf08188.
25. McMahon TA, Finlayson BL. 2003. Droughts and anti-droughts: the low flow hydrology of Australian rivers. Freshwater Biology 48: 1147–1160. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01098.x.
26. McManamay RA, Orth DJ, Dolloff CA, Mathews DC. 2013. Application of the ELOHA framework to regulated rivers in the Upper Tennessee River Basin: a case study. Environmental Management 51: 1210–1235. DOI:10.1007/s00267-013-0055-3.
27. MDBA. 2011a. The Living Murray story—one of Australia's largest river restoration projects, MDBA publication no: 157/11, Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/The-Living-Murray-story-One-of-Australias-largest-river-restoration-projects.pdf [accessed 12 March 2015].
28. MDBA. 2011b. The proposed environmentally sustainable level of take for surface water of the Murray–Darling Basin: methods and outcomes, MDBA publication no: 226/11, Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/archived/proposed/ESLT_MDBA_report.pdf [accessed 12 March 2015].
29. MDBA. 2012a. Assessment of environmental water requirements for the proposed Basin Plan. Series of 24 reports, Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. http://www.mdba.gov.au/what-we-do/basin-plan/development/bp-science/assessing-environmental-water-requirements [accessed 12 March 2015].
30. MDBA. 2012b. Hydrologic modelling to inform the proposed Basin Plan: methods and results. MDBA publication no: 17/12 Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. http://www.mdba.gov.au/what-we-do/basin-plan/development/bp-science [accessed 12 March 2015].
31. MDBC. 2006. The Barmah–Millewa Forest icon site environmental management plan 2006–2007, MDBC publication no: 30/06, Murray–Darling Basin Commission, Canberra. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/archived/mdbc-tlm-reports/2083_Env_Man_Plan_Barmah_Millewa_2006-07.pdf [accessed 12 March 2015].
32. Merritt DM, Scott ML, Poff NL, Auble GT, Lytle DA. 2009. Theory, methods and tools for determining environmental flows for riparian vegetation: riparian vegetation-flow response guilds. Freshwater Biology 55: 206–225. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02206.x.
33. th 2014. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/263614080_Stream_classification_and_assessment_of_hydrologic_alterations_towards_an_environmental_flow_appraisal_of_the_Magdalena-Cauca_River_basin_(Colombia) [accessed 18 June 2015].
34. Naiman RJ, Bunn SE, Nilsson C, Petts GE, Pinay G, Thompson LC. 2002. Legitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: an overview. Environmental Management 30: 455–467. DOI:10.1007/s00267-002-2734-3.
35. Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C. 2005. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science 308: 405–408. DOI:10.1126/science.1107887.
36. NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water. 2011. NSW Rivers Environmental Restoration Program: final report. https://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/pages/4cfd9575-598c-4a54-bfc8-d5ee30f62233/files/nsw-rivers-environmental-restoration-program.pdf [accessed 13 October 2015].
37. Overton IC, Colloff MJ, Doody TM, Henderson B, Cuddy SM (eds). 2009. Ecological outcomes of flow regimes in the Murray–Darling Basin. Report prepared for the National Water Commission by CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, CSIRO, Canberra. https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/download?pid=csiro:EP10048&dsid=DS6 [accessed 12 March 2015].
38. Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Follstad Shah J, Galat DL, Loss SG, Goodwin P, Hart DD, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf GM, Lave R, Meyer JL, O'Donnell TK, Pagano L, Sudduth E. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208–217. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x.
39. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC. 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47: 769–784. DOI:10.2307/1313099.
40. Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O'Keeffe JH, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A. 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 55: 147–170. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x.
41. Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology 55: 194–205. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x.
42. Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP. 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37: 231–249. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00153.x.
43. Richter BD, Davis M, Apse C, Konrad C. 2012. A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection. River Research and Applications 28: 1312–1321. DOI:10.1002/rra.1511.
44. Richter BD, Mathews R, Wigington R. 2003. Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications 13: 206–224. DOI:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0206:eswmmr]2.0.co;2.
45. Roberge J-M, Angelstam P. 2004. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology 18: 76–85. DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00450.x.
46. Roberts J, Marston F. 2011. Water regime for wetland and floodplain plants. A source book for the Murray-Darling Basin. National Water Commission, Canberra. http://archive.nwc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/11230/Wetlands_full_document.pdf [accessed 12 March 2015].
47. Rolls RJ, Leigh C, Sheldon F. 2012. Mechanistic effects of low-flow hydrology on riverine ecosystems: ecological principles and consequences of alteration. Freshwater Science 31: 1163–1186. DOI:10.1899/12-002.1.
48. Sanderson J, Bledsoe B, Poff NL, Wilding T, Fey N. 2012. Yampa–White Basin Roundtable Watershed Flow Evaluation Tool Study. Prepared by CDM Smith for The Nature Conservancy. https://www.conservationgateway.org/Files/Pages/yampawhitewfet.aspx [accessed 18 June 2015].
49. Scott A. 1997. Relationships between waterbird ecology and river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin. CSIRO Land and Water technical report no: 5/97, Canberra. http://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/technical97/tr5-97.pdf [accessed 12 March 2015].
50. Sheldon F. 2005. Incorporating natural variability into the assessment of ecological health in Australian dryland rivers. Hydrobiologia 552: 45–56. DOI:10.1007/210750-005-1504-7.
51. SKM. 2007. High Conservation Value Aquatic Ecosystems project—identifying, categorising and managing HCVAE, final report. http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/d66f4d88-325a-474f-b0ec-2fc691f7cee7/files/hcvae.pdf [accessed 12 March 2015].
52. Tharme RE. 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications 19: 397–441. DOI:10.1002/rra.736.
53. Thoms M, Sheldon F. 2002. An ecosystem approach for determining environmental water allocations in Australian dryland river systems: the role of geomorphology. Geomorphology 47: 153–168. DOI:10.1016/s0169-555x(02)00085-5.
54. Thomson JR, Bond NR, Cunningham SC, Metzeling L, Reich P, Thompson RM, Mac Nally R. 2012. The influences of climatic variation and vegetation on stream biota: lessons from the Big Dry in southeastern Australia. Global Change Biology 18: 1582–1596. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02609.x.
55. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment. 2008. Barmah Forest Ramsar site ecological character description, Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
56. Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers R. 2000. Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289: 284–288. DOI:10.1126/science.289.5477.284.
57. Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Liermann CR, Davies PM. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467: 555–561. DOI:10.1038/nature09440.
58. Water Act 2007 – Basin Plan. 2012. Prepared by the Murray–Darling Basin Authority. http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2012L02240 [accessed 12 March 2015].
59. Water Technology. 2009. Barmah–Millewa hydrodynamic modelling model recalibration. A report for the Goulburn-Broken Catchment Management Authority. http://www.gbcma.vic.gov.au/downloads/Wetlands/Barmah-Millewa_hydrodynamic_modelling_report_optimized.pdf [accessed 12 March 2015].
60. Wen L, Ling J, Saintilan N, Rogers K. 2009. An investigation of the hydrological requirements of River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) Forest, using classification and regression tree modelling. Ecohydrology 2: 143–155. DOI:10.1002/eco.46.
61. Yang A. 2010. The integrated river system modelling framework. A report to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority from the CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship. http://www.mdba.gov.au/kid/files/1535-IRSMF-Technical-report.pdf [accessed 13 March 2015].
62. Young WJ, Bond N, Brookes J, Gawne B, Jones GJ. 2011. Science review of the estimation of an environmentally sustainable level of take for the Murray–Darling Basin. Final Report to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority from the CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/archived/proposed/CSIRO_ESLT_Science_Review.pdf [accessed 13 March 2015].