A Longitudinal Examination of the Persistence of Late Emerging Reading Disabilities

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 21-35

  Etmanskie, Jill M ^a   Partanen, Marita ^a   Siegel, Linda S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

children; late emerging; longitudinal; reading comprehension; reading disabilities

Indexed keywords

CHILD; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; ONSET AGE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

AGE OF ONSET; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE;

EID: 84948844641     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219414522706     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. M.J.Adams (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. A.D.BaddeleyG.J.Hitch (1994). Development in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 485–493.
3. N.A.Badian (1999). Reading disability defined as a discrepancy between listening and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study of stability, gender differences, and prevalence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 138–148.
4. K.Cain (2006). Individual differences in children’s memory and reading comprehension: An investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits. Memory, 14, 553–569.
5. K.CainJ.OakhillP.E.Bryant (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42.
6. H.W.CattsD.ComptonJ.B.TomblinM.S.Bridges (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 166–181.
7. H.W.CattsT.P.Hogan (2002, November). At what grades should we assess phonological awareness?Poster presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Atlanta, GA.
8. J.S.Chall (1983). Stages of reading development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9. J.S.ChallV.A.Jacobs (2003). Poor children’s fourth grade slump. American Educator, 27, 14–15.
10. J.S.ChallV.A.JacobsL.E.Baldwin (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. D.L.ComptonD.FuchsL.S.FuchsA.M.EllemanJ.K.Gilbert (2008). Tracking children who fly below the radar: Latent transition modeling of students with late-emerging reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 329–337.
12. A.D’AngiulliL.S.Siegel (2004). Early literacy instruction, SES, and reading development in English language learners and children with English as a first language. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 19, 202–213.
13. D.DeFordC.LyonsG.Pinnell (1991). Bridges to literacy: Learning from Reading Recovery. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. P.F.de JongA.van der Leij (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51–77.
15. M.DencklaR.G.Rudel (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.
16. C.ElbroH.S.Scarborough (2004). Early identification. In P.BryantT.Nunes (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 339–359). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
17. E.GevaA.Massey-Garrison (2013). A comparison of the language skills of ELLs and monolinguals who are poor decoders, poor comprehenders, or normal readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 387–401.
18. C.Juel (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.
19. B.KarlsenE.Gardner (1995). Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Harcourt Brace.
20. M.J.Kieffer (2010). Socioeconomic status, English proficiency, and late-emerging reading difficulties. Educational Researcher, 39, 484–486.
21. J.M.LeachH.S.ScarboroughL.Rescorla (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 211–224.
22. N.K.LesauxL.S.Siegel (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1005–1019.
23. O.LipkaN.K.LesauxL.S.Siegel (2006). Retrospective analyses of the reading development of Grade 4 students with reading disabilities: Risk status and profiles over 5 years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 364−378.
24. V.MuterC.HulmeM.Snowling (1997). The Phonological Abilities Test. London, UK: Psychological Corporation.
25. North Vancouver School District. (1999). Reading 44: A core reading framework. North Vancouver, BC, Canada: Author.
26. North Vancouver School District. (2001). Firm foundations: Early literacy teaching and training. North Vancouver, BC, Canada: Author.
27. E.S.NortonM.Wolf (2012). Rapid automatized naming fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452.
28. J.V.OakhillK.Cain (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121.
29. H.S.Scarborough (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B.K.ShapiroP.J.AccardoA.J.Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75–119). Timonium, MD: York Press.
30. C.C.SextonH.L.GelhornJ.A.BellP.M.Classi (2012). The co-occurrence of reading disorder and ADHD: Epidemiology, treatment, psychosocial impact, and economic burden. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 538–564.
31. D.ShankweilerE.LundquistL.KatzK.K.StuebingJ.M.FletcherS.BradyB.A.. Shaywitz (1999). Comprehension and decoding: Pattern of association in children with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 69–94.
32. S.E.ShaywitzM.D.EscobarB.A.ShaywitzJ.M.FletcherR.Makuch (1992). Evidence that dyslexiamayrepresent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145–150.
33. S.E.ShaywitzB.A.ShaywitzJ.M.FletcherM.D.Escobar (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut longitudinal study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 998–1002.
34. D.T.L.ShekC.M.S.Ma (2011). Longitudinal data analysis using linear mixed models in SPSS: Concepts, procedures and illustrations. Scientific World Journal, 11, 42–76.
35. L.S.Siegel (1986). Phonological deficits in children with a reading disability. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 2, 45–54.
36. L.S.SiegelE.B.Ryan (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973–980.
37. C.SnowS.BurnsP.Griffin (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
38. K.E.Stanovich (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
39. K.E.StanovichL.S.Siegel (1994). The phenotypic performance profile of reading-disabled children: A regression-based test of phonological-core variable difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.
40. H.L.SwansonP.KehlerO.Jerman (2010). Working memory, strategy knowledge, and strategy instruction in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 24–47.
41. B.G.TabachnickL.S.Fidell (2006). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
42. R.L.ThorndikeE.P.HagenJ.M.Sattler (1986). Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Riverside.
43. X.TongS.H.DeaconJ.R.KirbyK.CainR.Parrila (2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 523–534.
44. S.TremblayN.RossJ.-M.Berthelot (2001). Factors affecting Grade 3 student performance in Ontario: A multilevel analysis. Education Quarterly Review, 7, 25–36.
45. W.E.TunmerJ.W.ChapmanK.T.GreaneyJ.E.Prochnow (2002). The contribution of educational psychology to intervention research and practice. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49, 11–29.
46. F.R.VellutinoD.M.ScanlonE.R.SipayS.G.SmallA.PrattR.ChenM.B.Denckla (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficulty-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
47. G.S.Wilkinson (1993). The Wide Range Achievement Test–3. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
48. D.M.WillowsE.B.Ryan (1986). The development of grammatical sensitivity and its relation to early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 253–266.
49. R.W.Woodcock (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
50. J.WorthyE.PattersonR.SalasS.PraterM.Turner (2002). “More than just reading”: The human factor in reaching resistant readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 41, 177–202.
51. D.W.ZimmermanB.D.Zumbo (1993). Relative power of parametric and nonparametric statistical methods. In G.KerenC.Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences, Volume 1: Methodological issues (pp. 481–517). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. D.W.ZimmermanB.D.Zumbo (2005). Can percentiles replace raw scores in statistical analysis of test data?Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 616–638.