Drought tolerance strategies highlighted by two Sorghum bicolor races in a dry-down experiment

Journal of Plant Physiology

Volumn 190, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-14

  Fracasso, Alessandra ^a   Trindade, Luisa ^b   Amaducci, Stefano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chlorophyll fluorescence; Drought stress; Gas exchange; qRT PCR; Sorghum bicolor (Moench); Tolerance indices

Indexed keywords

SOIL;

ADAPTATION; CHEMISTRY; DESICCATION; DROUGHT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; SOIL; SORGHUM;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; DESICCATION; DROUGHTS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENOTYPE; SOIL; SORGHUM; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84948807942     PISSN: 01761617     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Ashraf M. Inducing drought tolerance in plants: recent advances. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28(1):169-183.
2. Barr H.D., Weatherley P.E. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1962, 15:413-428.
3. Blum A. Drought resistance-is it really a complex trait?. Funct. Plant Biol. 2011, 38:753-757.
4. Boyer J.S., Westgate M.E. Grain yields with limited water. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55(407):2385-2394.
5. Brini F., Hanin M., Lumbreras V., Amara I., Khoudi H., Hassairi A., et al. Overexpression of wheat dehydrin DHN-5 enhances tolerance to salt and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26(11):2017-2026.
6. Bruce W.B., Edmeades G.O., Barker T.C. Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53(366):13-25.
7. Buchanan C.D., Lim S., Salzman R.a., Kagiampakis I., Morishige D.T., Weers B.D., et al. Sorghum bicolor's transcriptome response to dehydration, high salinity and ABA. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 58(5):699-720.
8. Casadebaig P., Debaeke P., Lecoeur J. Thresholds for leaf expansion and transpiration response to soil water deficit in a range of sunflower genotypes. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 28(4):646-654.
9. Cattivelli L., Rizza F., Badeck F.-W., Mazzucotelli E., Mastrangelo A.M., Francia E., et al. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crop Res. 2008, 105(1-2):1-14.
10. Chandra Babu R., Zhang J., Blum A Ho T.H.D., Wu R., Nguyen H.T. HVA1, a LEA gene from barley confers dehydration tolerance in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) via cell membrane protection. Plant Sci. 2004, 166(4):855-862.
11. Comstock J.P. Hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and transpiration. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53(367):195-200.
12. 2 enrichment (FACE) conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25:1551-1559.
13. Davies W.J., Zhang J. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development in plants in drying soils. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 42:55-70.
14. 3 plants under stress. Plant Sci. 2011, 180(4):575-583.
15. Dugas D.V., Monaco M.K., Olsen A., Klein R.R., Kumari S., Ware D., et al. Functional annotation of the transcriptome of Sorghum bicolor in response to osmotic stress and abscisic acid. BMC Genomics 2011, 12:514.
16. Finkelstein R.R., Lynch T.J. Abscisic acid inhibition of radicle emergence but not seedling growth is suppressed by sugars. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122(4):1179-1186.
17. Giuliani S., Sanguineti M.C., Tuberosa R., Bellotti M., Salvi S., Landi P. Root-ABA1, a major constitutive QTL, affects maize root architecture and leaf ABA concentration at different water regimes. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56(422):3061-3070.
18. Gosal S.S., Wani S.H., Kang M.S. Biotechnology and drought tolerance. J. Crop Improv. 2009, 23(1):19-54.
19. Grigorova B., Vaseva I., Demirevska K., Feller U. Combined drought and heat stress in wheat changes in some heat shock proteins. Biol. Plant. 2011, 55(1):105-111.
20. Gubiš J., Vaňková R., Červená V., Dragúňová M., Hudcovicová M., Lichtnerová H., et al. Transformed tobacco plants with increased tolerance to drought. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2007, 73(4):505-511.
21. Guo P., Baum M., Grando S., Ceccarelli S., Bai G., Li R., et al. Differentially expressed genes between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive barley genotypes in response to drought stress during the reproductive stage. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60(12):3531-3544.
22. Guzman J.G., Lal R., Byrd S., Apfelbaum S.I., Thompson R.L. Carbon life cycle assessment for prairie as a crop in reclaimed mine land. Land Degrad. Dev. 2014, 10.1002/ldr.2291.
23. Havaux M., Strasser R.J. Plasticity of stress tolerance of photosystem II in vivo. Photosynth. Res. 1992, 34:215.
24. Henzler T., Waterhouse R.N., Smyth A.J., Carvajal M., Cooke D.T., Steudle E., et al. Diurnal variations in hydraulic conductivity and root pressure can be correlated with the expression of putative aquaporins in the roots of Lotus japonicus. Planta 1999, 50-60.
25. 2 controlled stomatal movements. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12(1):1-18.
26. Huang B., Gao H. Root physiological characteristics associated with drought resistance in tall fescue cultivars. Crop Sci. 2000, 203(99):196-203.
27. Jagtap V., Bhargava S., Streb P., Feierabend J. Comparative effect of water, heat and light stresses on photosynthetic reactions in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. J. Exp. Bot. 1998, 49(327):1715-1721.
28. Jaleel C.A., Gopi R., Panneerselvam R. Alterations in lipid peroxidation, electrolyte leakage, and proline metabolism in Catharanthus roseus under treatment with triadimefon, a systemic fungicide. C R Biol. 2007, 330(12):905-912.
29. Jang J.Y., Kim D.G., Kim Y.O., Kim J.S., Kang H. An expression analysis of a gene family encoding plasma membrane aquaporins in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 54(5):713-725.
30. Jones H.G. Monitoring plant and soil water status: established and novel methods revisited and their relevance to studies of drought tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58(2):119-130.
31. Karamanos A.J., Papatheohari A.Y. Assessment of drought resistant crop genotypes by means of the water potential index. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:1792-1797.
32. Karthikeyan B., Jaleel C.A., Gopi R., Deiveekasundaram M. Alterations in seedling vigour and antioxidant enzyme activities in Catharanthus roseus under seed priming with native diazotrophs. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2007, 8(7):453-457.
33. Koçar G., Civaş N. An overview of biofuels from energy crops: current status and future prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 28:900-916.
34. Laporte M.M., Shen B., Tarczynski M.C. Engineering for drought avoidance: expression of maize NADP-malic enzyme in tobacco results in altered stomatal function. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53(369):699-705.
35. Laur J., Hacke U.G. Transpirational demand affects aquaporin expression in poplar roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64(8):2283-2293.
36. Lecoeur J., Sinclair T.R. Field pea transpiration and leaf growth in response to soil water deficit. Crop Sci. 1996, 36:331-335.
37. T method. Methods 2001, 25:402-408.
38. Luquet D., Clément-Vidal A., Fabre D., This D., Sonderegger N., Dingkuhn M. Orchestration of transpiration, growth and carbohydrate dynamics in rice during a dry-down cycle. Funct. Plant Biol. 2008, 35(8):689.
39. Mace E.S., Jordan D.R. Integrating sorghum whole genome sequence information with a compendium of sorghum QTL studies reveals uneven distribution of QTL and of gene-rich regions with significant implications for crop improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123(1):169-191.
40. Mace E.S., Rami J.-F., Bouchet S., Klein P.E., Klein R.R., Kilian A., et al. A consensus genetic map of sorghum that integrates multiple component maps and high-throughput diversity array technology (DArT) markers. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9:13.
41. Maiti R.K., Ibarra M.R., Sandoval N. Genotypic variability in glossy sorghum lines for resistance to drought, salinity and temperature stress at the seedling stage. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 143:241-244.
42. Mansfield M.A., Key J.L. Synthesis of the low molecular weight heat shock proteins in plants. Plant Physiol. 1987, 84:1007-1017.
43. Masojídek J., Trivedi S., Halshaw L., Alexiou A., Hall D.O. The synergistic effect of drought and light stresses in sorghum and pearl millet. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96(1):198-207.
44. Nogués S., Alegre L., Araus J., Perez-Aranda L., Lannoye R. Modulated chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic gas exchange as rapid screening methods for drought tolerance in barley genotypes. Photosynthetica 1994, 30:465-474.
45. Ort D.R. When there is too much light. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125:29-32.
46. Pardossi A., Vernieri P., Tognoni F. Evaluation of the pressure chamber methods for the assessment of water status in chilled plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1991, 14:675-682.
47. Pasini L., Bergonti M., Fracasso A., Marocco A., Amaducci S. Microarray analysis of differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAs in young leaves of sorghum under dry-down conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171(7):537-548.
48. Paterson A.H., Bowers J.E., Bruggmann R., Dubchak I., Grimwood J., Gundlach H., et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 2009, 457(7229):551-556.
49. Perez-Martin A., Michelazzo C., Torres-Ruiz J.M., Flexas J., Fernández J.E., Sebastiani L., et al. Regulation of photosynthesis and stomatal and mesophyll conductance under water stress and recovery in olive trees: correlation with gene expression of carbonic anhydrase and aquaporins. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65(12):3143-3156.
50. Pinheiro C., Chaves M.M. Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data?. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62(3):869-882.
51. Poormohammad Kiani S., Grieu P., Maury P., Hewezi T., Gentzbittel L. Sarrafia: genetic variability for physiological traits under drought conditions and differential expression of water stress-associated genes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 114(2):193-207.
52. Pou A., Medrano H., Flexas J., Tyerman S.D. A putative role for TIP and PIP aquaporins in dynamics of leaf hydraulic and stomatal conductances in grapevine under water stress and re-watering. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36(4):828-843.
53. Pratt L.H., Liang C., Shah M., Sun F., Wang H., Reid S.P., et al. Sorghum expressed sequence tags identify signature genes for drought, pathogenesis, and skotomorphogenesis from a milestone set of 16, 801 unique transcripts 1 [w]. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139:869-884.
54. Rooney W.L., Blumenthal J., Bean B., Mullet J. Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Biofuel Bioprod. Biorefin. 2007, 147-157.
55. Sato Y., Yokoya S. Enhanced tolerance to drought stress in transgenic riceplants overexpressing a small heat-shock protein, sHSP17.7. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27:329-334.
56. Satoh R., Fujita Y., Nakashima K., Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. A novel subgroup of bZIP proteins functions as transcriptional activators in hypoosmolarity-responsive expression of the ProDH gene in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45(3):309-317.
57. Shao H.-B., Chu L.-Y., Jaleel C.A., Zhao C.-X. Water-deficit stress-induced anatomical changes in higher plants. C R Biol. 2008, 331(3):215-225.
58. Sharp R.E., Poroyko V., Hejlek L.G., Spollen W.G., Springer G.K., Bohnert H.J., et al. Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55(407):2343-2351.
59. 2 double mutant in maize. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165(2):608-617.
60. Torres G.A.M., Gimenes M.A., Rosa V.E.D., Quecini V. Identifying water stress-response mechanisms in citrus by in silico transcriptome analysis. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2007, 30(3):888-905.
61. Tsuj W., Ali M., Inanaga S., Sugimoto Y. Growth and gas exchange of three sorghum cultivars under drought stress. Biol. Plantarum 2003, 46(4):583-587.
62. Uno Y., Furihata T., Abe H., Yoshida R., Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Arabidopsis basic leucine zipper transcription factors involved in an abscisic acid-dependent signal transduction pathway under drought and high-salinity conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97(21):11632-11637.
63. Valliyodan B., Nguyen H.T. Understanding regulatory networks and engineering for enhanced drought tolerance in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9(2):189-195.
64. Xiao B., Huang Y., Tang N., Xiong L. Over-expression of a LEA gene in rice improves drought resistance under the field conditions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 115(1):35-46.
65. Xin Z., Franks C., Payton P., Burke J.J. A simple method to determine transpiration efficiency in sorghum. Field Crop Res. 2008, 107(2):180-183.
66. Yamada M., Morishita H., Urano K., Shiozaki N., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K., et al. Effects of free proline accumulation in Petunias under drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56(417):1975-1981.
67. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K. Organization of cis-acting regulatory elements in osmotic-and cold-stress-responsive promoters. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10(2):88-94.
68. 2 assimilation in three Sorghum cultivars. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2000, 185:73-82.