Sex differences in gray matter changes and brain-behavior relationships in patients with stimulant dependence1

Radiology

Volumn 277, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 801-812

  Regner, Michael F ^a   Dalwani, Manish ^a   Yamamoto, Dorothy ^a   Perry, Robert I ^a   Sakai, Joseph T ^a   Honce, Justin M ^a   Tanabe, Jody ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BARRATT IMPULSIVENESS SCALE; BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT; BRAIN RADIOGRAPHY; BRAIN SIZE; COMPOSITE INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW SUBSTANCE ABUSE MODULE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW SCHEDULE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; GRAY MATTER; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMPULSIVENESS; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; LIMBIC CORTEX; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PARALLEL DESIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY; BRAIN; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; BRAIN; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; SEX FACTORS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84948759081     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142541     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Miller TR, Hendrie D. Substance abuse prevention dollars and cents: A cost-benefit analysis. Rockville, Md: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, 2009.
2. Ersche KD, Williams GB, Robbins TW, Bullmore ET. Meta-analysis of structural brain abnormalities associated with stimulant drug dependence and neuroimaging of addiction vulnerability and resilience. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2013;23(4): 615-624.
3. Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010;35(1): 217-238.
4. Ersche KD, Jones PS, Williams GB, Turton AJ, Robbins TW, Bullmore ET. Abnormal brain structure implicated in stimulant drug addiction. Science 2012;335(6068): 601-604.
5. Becker JB, Perry AN, Westenbroek C. Sex differences in the neural mechanisms mediating addiction: a new synthesis and hypothesis. Biol Sex Differ 2012;3(1):14.
6. Perry RI, Krmpotich T, Thompson LL, Mikulich-Gilbertson SK, Banich MT, Tanabe J. Sex modulates approach systems and impulsivity in substance dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013;133(1): 222-227.
7. Griffin ML, Weiss RD, Mirin SM, Lange U. A comparison of male and female cocaine abusers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46(2):122-126.
8. Mendelson JH, Weiss R, Griffin M, et al. Some special considerations for treatment of drug abuse and dependence in women. NIDA Res Monogr 1991;106:313-327.
9. Greenfield SF, Back SE, Lawson K, Brady KT. Substance abuse in women. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2010;33(2):339-355.
10. Lynch WJ. Sex differences in vulnerability to drug self-administration. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2006;14(1):34-41.
11. Brady KT, Randall CL. Gender differences in substance use disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1999;22(2):241-252.
12. Back SE, Brady KT, Jackson JL, Salstrom S, Zinzow H. Gender differences in stress reactivity among cocaine-dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005;180(1):169-176.
13. Kosten TA, Gawin FH, Kosten TR, Rounsaville BJ. Gender differences in cocaine use and treatment response. J Subst Abuse Treat 1993;10(1):63-66.
14. Potenza MN, Hong KI, Lacadie CM, Fulbright RK, Tuit KL, Sinha R. Neural correlates of stress-induced and cue-induced drug craving: influences of sex and cocaine dependence. Am J Psychiatry 2012;169(4):406-414.
15. Barrós-Loscertales A, Garavan H, Bustamante JC, et al. Reduced striatal volume in cocaine-dependent patients. Neuroimage 2011;56(3):1021-1026.
16. Fein G, Di Sclafani V, Meyerhoff DJ. Prefrontal cortical volume reduction associated with frontal cortex function deficit in 6-week abstinent crack-cocaine dependent men. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002;68(1): 87-93.
17. Franklin TR, Acton PD, Maldjian JA, et al. Decreased gray matter concentration in the insular, orbitofrontal, cingulate, and temporal cortices of cocaine patients. Biol Psychiatry 2002;51(2):134-142.
18. Sim ME, Lyoo IK, Streeter CC, et al. Cerebellar gray matter volume correlates with duration of cocaine use in cocaine-dependent subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007; 32(10):2229-2237.
19. Tanabe J, Tregellas JR, Dalwani M, et al. Medial orbitofrontal cortex gray matter is reduced in abstinent substance-dependent individuals. Biol Psychiatry 2009;65(2):160-164.
20. Tanabe J, York P, Krmpotich T, et al. Insula and orbitofrontal cortical morphology in substance dependence is modulated by sex. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34(6):1150-1156.
21. Rando K, Tuit K, Hannestad J, Guarnaccia J, Sinha R. Sex differences in decreased limbic and cortical grey matter volume in cocaine dependence: a voxel-based morphometric study. Addict Biol 2013;18(1): 147-160.
22. Cottler LB, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The reliability of the CIDI-SAM: a comprehensive substance abuse interview. Br J Addict 1989; 84(7):801-814.
23. Robins L, Cottler L, Bucholz K, Compton W. The diagnostic interview schedule, version IV. St Louis, Mo: Washington University, 1995.
24. Gelhorn H, Hartman C, Sakai J, et al. Toward DSM-V: an item response theory analysis of the diagnostic process for DSMIV alcohol abuse and dependence in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2008;47(11):1329-1339.
25. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol 1995;51(6): 768-774.
26. Carver CS, White TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;67(2):319-333.
27. Campbell-Sills L, Liverant GI, Brown TA. Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation scales in a large sample of outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders. Psychol Assess 2004;16(3): 244-254.
28. Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 2007;38(1):95-113.
29. Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, Henson RN, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS. A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 2001;14(1 Pt 1):21-36.
30. Diedrichsen J, Balsters JH, Flavell J, Cussans E, Ramnani N. A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum. Neuroimage 2009;46(1):39-46.
31. Smith SM, Nichols TE. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009;44(1):83-98.
32. Radua J, Canales-Rodríguez EJ, Pomarol-Clotet E, Salvador R. Validity of modulation and optimal settings for advanced voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2014;86:81-90.
33. Kerr WT, Douglas PK, Anderson A, Cohen MS. The utility of data-driven feature selection: re: Chu et al. 2012. Neuroimage 2014;84:1107-1110.
34. Chu C, Hsu AL, Chou KH, Bandettini P, Lin C; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Does feature selection im-prove classification accuracy? Impact of sample size and feature selection on classification using anatomical magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 2012;60(1): 59-70.
35. Nieto-Castanon A, Ghosh SS, Tourville JA, Guenther FH. Region of interest based analysis of functional imaging data. Neuroimage 2003;19(4):1303-1316.
36. Li CS, Sinha R. Inhibitory control and emotional stress regulation: neuroimaging evidence for frontal-limbic dysfunction in psycho-stimulant addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008;32(3):581-597.
37. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002;15(1):273-289.
38. Sescousse G, Caldú X, Segura B, Dreher JC. Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013;37(4):681-696.
39. Draganski B, Kherif F. In vivo assessment of use-dependent brain plasticity-beyond the one trick pony imaging strategy. Neuroimage 2013;73:255-259; discussion 265-267.
40. Fields RD. Changes in brain structure during learning: fact or artifact? Reply to Thomas and Baker. Neuroimage 2013;73:260-264; discussion 265-267.
41. Connolly CG, Bell RP, Foxe JJ, Garavan H. Dissociated grey matter changes with prolonged addiction and extended abstinence in cocaine users. PLoS ONE 2013;8(3):e59645.
42. Sara G, Burgess P, Harris M, Malhi GS, Whiteford H, Hall W. Stimulant use disorders: characteristics and comorbidity in an Australian population sample. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2012;46(12):1173-1181.
43. Stinson FS, Grant BF, Dawson DA, Ruan WJ, Huang B, Saha T. Comorbidity between DSM-IV alcohol and specific drug use disorders in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005;80(1):105-116.