The Predictive Value of Discrete Choice Experiments in Public Health: An Exploratory Application

Patient

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 521-529

  Salampessy, Benjamin H ^a   Veldwijk, Jorien ^a,b   Jantine Schuit, A ^a,d   van den Brekel Dijkstra, Karolien ^c   Neslo, Rabin E J ^b   Ardine de Wit, G ^a,b   Lambooij, Mattijs S ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE; AGED; COST; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIET; EXERCISE; INJURY SCALE; LIFESTYLE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIET; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC HEALTH; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES;

EID: 84948585297     PISSN: 11781653     EISSN: 11781661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0115-2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S, et al. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32:883–902.
2. de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21:145–72.
3. Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2009;18:389–401.
4. Adamowicz WL (1992) Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environment amenities. Edmonton: Dept. of Rural Economy, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Alberta.
5. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
6. Hensher D, Bradley M. Using stated response choice data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models. Market Lett. 1993;4:139–51.
7. Ben-Akiva M, Morikawa T. Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions. Transport Res Part A Gen. 1990;24:485–95.
8. Adamowicz W, Swait J, Boxall P, et al. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. J Environ Econ Manage. 1997;32:65–84.
9. Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2:55–64.
10. Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference modeling to forecast the effect of medication attributes on prescriptions of alcoholism medications. Value Health. 2003;6:474–82.
11. Krucien N, Gafni A, Pelletier-Fleury N. Empirical testing of the external validity of a discrete choice experiment to determine preferred treatment option: the case of sleep apnea. Health Econ 2014;1. doi:10.1002/hec.3076.
12. Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M. Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell. In: Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008. p. 13–46.
13. Johnson FR, Mohamed AF, Ozdemir S, et al. How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments? Health Econ. 2011;20:323–30.
14. Train K, Wilson WW. Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices. Transport Res Part B Methodol. 2008;42:191–203.
15. Rhodes RE, Plotnikoff RC, Courneya KS. Predicting the physical activity intention–behavior profiles of adopters and maintainers using three social cognition models. Ann Behav Med. 2008;36:244–52.
16. Thomas N, Alder E, Leese GP. Barriers to physical activity in patients with diabetes. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80:287–91.
17. Sheeran P. Intention–behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2002;12:1–36.
18. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied choice analysis: a primer. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
19. Veldwijk J, Lambooij MS, van Gils PF, et al. Type 2 diabetes patients’ preferences and willingness to pay for lifestyle programs: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1099.
20. Bliemer MC, Rose JM. Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations. Transport Res Part B Methodol. 2010;44:720–34.
21. McFadden D, Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econ. 2000;15:447–70.
22. Bech M, Gyrd-Hansen D. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2005;14:1079–83.
23. Fiebig DG, Keane MP, Louviere J, et al. The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Market Sci. 2010;29:393–421.
24. Van Binsbergen J, Langens F, Dapper A, et al. NHG-standaard obesitas. Huisarts Wet. 2010;53:609–25.
25. Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR. High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:551–8.
26. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:543–9.
27. Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26:661–77.
28. James DV, Johnston LH, Crone D, et al. Factors associated with physical activity referral uptake and participation. J Sports Sci. 2008;26:217–24.
29. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, Knowler WC, Fowler SE, et al. 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet. 2009;374:1677–86.
30. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ. 1994;309:102.