ST-segment depression resolution predicts infarct size and reperfusion injury in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Heart

Volumn 101, Issue 22, 2015, Pages 1819-1825

  Reinstadler, Sebastian J ^a,b   Baum, Anett ^a   Rommel, Karl Philipp ^c   Eitel, Charlotte ^a   Desch, Steffen ^a   Mende, Meinhard ^c   Metzler, Bernhard ^b   Poess, Janine ^a   Thiele, Holger ^a   Eitel, Ingo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

^b INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL OCCLUSION; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE MARKER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL CONDITION DETERIORATION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROVASCULAR OBSTRUCTION; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REPERFUSION INJURY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; ST SEGMENT DEPRESSION; ST SEGMENT DEPRESSION RESOLUTION; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REPERFUSION; HOSPITAL READMISSION; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MORTALITY; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION INJURY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION INJURY; PATIENT READMISSION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROGNOSIS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84948582792     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307876     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Buller CE, Fu Y, Mahaffey K.W., et al. ST-segment recovery and outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX-AMI) trial. Circulation 2008; 118:1335-46.
2. Haraphongse M, Tanomsup S, Jugdutt BI Inferior ST segment depression during acute anterior myocardial infarction: clinical and angiographic correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4:467-76.
3. Pichler M, Shah PK, Peter T, et al Wall motion abnormalities and electrocardiographic changes in acute transmural myocardial infarction: implications of reciprocal ST segment depression. Am Heart J 1983; 106:1003-9.
4. De Luca G., Maas AC, van't Hof AW, et al. Impact of ST-segment depression resolution on mortality after successful mechanical reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95:234-6.
5. Shah A, Wagner GS, Califf R.M., et al. Comparative prognostic significance of simultaneous versus independent resolution of ST segment depression relative to ST segment elevation during acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:1478-83.
6. Tjandrawidjaja MC, Fu Y, Westerhout C.M., et al. Resolution of ST-segment depression: A new prognostic marker in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:573-81.
7. Wong CK, Gao W, White HD Resolution of ST depression after fibrinolysis can be more important than resolution of ST elevation for many patients with inferior STEMIs. Int J Cardiol 2014; 182C:232-4.
8. Klug G, Metzler B. Assessing myocardial recovery following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: short- and long-term perspectives using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2013; 11:203-19.
9. Thiele H, Wohrle J, Neuhaus P., et al. Intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus abciximab application during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the Abciximab Intracoronary versus intravenously Drug Application in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (AIDA STEMI) trial. Am Heart J 2010; 159:547-54.
10. Thiele H, Wohrle J, Hambrecht R., et al. Intracoronary versus intravenous bolus abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet 2012; 379:923-31.
11. Desch S, Wohrle J, Hambrecht R., et al. Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab bolus in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of the randomized AIDA STEMI trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:1214-5.
12. Eitel I, Wohrle J, Suenkel H., et al. Intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus abciximab application during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: cardiac magnetic resonance substudy of the AIDA STEMI trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:1447-54.
13. Desch S, Engelhardt H, Meissner J., et al. Reliability of myocardial salvage assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 28:263-72.
14. Eitel I, Kubusch K, Strohm O., et al. Prognostic value and determinants of a hypointense infarct core in T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance in acute reperfused ST-elevation-myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4:354-62.
15. Goeman JJ. L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model. Biometrical J 2010; 52:70-84.
16. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44:837-45.
17. Willems JL, Willems RJ, Willems G.M., et al. Significance of initial ST segment elevation and depression for the management of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. European Cooperative Study Group for Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator. Circulation 1990; 82:1147-58.
18. Noriega FJ, Vives-Borras M, Sole-Gonzalez E, et al. Influence of the extent of coronary atherosclerotic disease on ST-segment changes induced by ST elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113:757-64.
19. Forfar JC. Reciprocal ST segment changes in acute myocardial infarction; informative or incidental? Q J Med 1989; 72:763-5.
20. Shah PK, Pichler M, Berman D.S., et al. Noninvasive identification of a high risk subset of patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1980; 46:915-21.
21. Zoghi M, Gurgun C, Yavuzgil O., et al. The angiographic correlation between ST segment depression in noninfarcted leads and the extent of coronary artery disease in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction: a clue for multivessel disease. Can J Cardiol 2003; 19:67-71.
22. Kyriakidis M, Antonopoulos A, Barbetseas J., et al. Correlation of reciprocal ST-segment depression after acute myocardial infarction with coronary angiographic findings. Int J Cardiol 1992; 36:163-8.
23. Stevenson RN, Ranjadayalan K, Umachandran V., et al. Significance of reciprocal ST depression in acute myocardial infarction: a study of 258 patients treated by thrombolysis. Br Heart J 1993; 69:211-4.
24. Tabbalat RA, Haft JI Are reciprocal changes a consequence of "ischemia at a distance" or merely a benign electric phenomenon? A PTCA study. Am Heart J 1993; 126:95-103.
25. Kidambi A, Mather AN, Uddin A, et al Reciprocal ECG change in reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction is associated with myocardial salvage and area at risk assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Heart 2013; 99:1658-62.
26. Eitel I, de Waha S, Wohrle J, et al Comprehensive prognosis assessment by CMR imaging after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64:1217-26.
27. Klug G, Mayr A, Schenk S., et al. Prognostic value at 5 years of microvascular obstruction after acute myocardial infarction assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Resonan 2012; 14:46.
28. Haeck JD, Verouden NJ, Kuijt W.J., et al. Impact of early, late, and no ST-segment resolution measured by continuous ST Holter monitoring on left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size as determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Electrocardiol 2011; 44:36-41.