Remote histology learning from static versus dynamic microscopic images

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 222-230

  Mione, Sylvia ^a   Valcke, Martin ^a   Cornelissen, Maria ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Basic sciences in medical curriculum; Computers in histology education; Histology education; Medical education; Microscopic anatomy education; Multimedia learning; Static and dynamic imaging; Virtual microscopy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MICROSCOPY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MICROSCOPY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84947997827     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.1572     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ainsworth S. 2006. DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learn Instr 16:183-198.
2. Barbeau ML, Johnson M, Gibson C, Rogers KA. 2013. The development and assessment of an online microscopic anatomy laboratory course. Anat Sci Educ 6:246-256.
3. Bergman EM, Prince KJ, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. 2008. How much anatomy is enough? Anat Sci Educ 1:184-188.
4. Blake CA, Lavoie HA, Millette CF. 2003. Teaching medical histology at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine: Transition to virtual slides and virtual microscopes. Anat Rec 275B:196-206.
5. Bloodgood RA, Ogilvie RW. 2006. Trends in histology laboratory teaching in United States medical schools. Anat Rec 289B:169-175.
6. Bodemer D, Faust U. 2006. External and mental referencing of multiple representations. Comput Hum Behav 22:27-42.
7. Boelen C. 1992. Medical education reform: The need for global action. Acad Med 67:745-749.
8. Boelen C. 1996. The Five-Star Doctor: An Asset to Health Care Reform? Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 13 p. URL: http://www.who.int/hrh/en/HRDJ_1_1_02.pdf [accessed 11 September 2015].
9. Braun MW, Kearns KD. 2008. Improved learning efficiency and increased student collaboration through use of virtual microscopy in the teaching of human pathology. Anat Sci Educ 1:240-246.
10. Bruner J. 1966. Toward a Theory of Instruction. 1st Ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 176 p.
11. Cook DA. 2005. The research we still are not doing: An agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med 80:541-548.
12. Dee FR. 2009. Virtual microscopy in pathology education. Hum Pathol 40:1112-1121.
13. De Maeseneer J. 2003. Artsen opleiden in een veranderend maatschappelijk veld. Tijdschr Med Ond 22:161-168.
14. Diaz-Perez JA, Raju S, Echeverri JH. 2014. Evaluation of a teaching strategy based on integration of clinical subjects, virtual autopsy, pathology museum, and digital microscopy for medical students. J Pathol Inform 5:25-
15. Drake RL. 2014. A retrospective and prospective look at medical education in the United States: Trends shaping anatomical sciences education. J Anat 224:256-260.
16. Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. 2009. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ 2:253-259.
17. Drake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W. 2014. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat Sci Educ 7:321-325.
18. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, Kistnasamy B, Meleis A, Naylor D, Pablos-Mendez A, Reddy S, Scrimshaw S, Sepulveda J, Serwadda D, Zurayk H. 2010. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 376:1923-1958.
19. Gatumu MK, MacMillan FM, Langton PD, Headley PM, Harris JR. 2014. Evaluation of usage of virtual microscopy for the study of histology in the medical, dental, and veterinary undergraduate programs of a UK University. Anat Sci Educ 7:389-398.
20. Goldberg HR, Dintzis R. 2007. The positive impact of team-based virtual microscopy on student learning in physiology and histology. Adv Physiol Educ 31:261-265.
21. Hamilton PW, Wang Y, McCullough SJ. 2012. Virtual microscopy and digital pathology in training and education. Apmis 120:305-315.
22. Hegarty M. 2004. Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learn Instr 14:343-351.
23. Helin H, Lundin M, Lundin J, Martikainen P, Tammela T, Helin H, van der Kwast T, Isola J. 2005. Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading. Hum Pathol 36:381-386.
24. Helle L, Nivala M, Kronqvist P. 2013. More technology, better learning resources, better learning? Lessons from adopting virtual microscopy in undergraduate medical education. Anat Sci Educ 6:73-80.
25. Hopkins R, Regehr G, Wilson TD. 2011. Exploring the changing learning environment of the gross anatomy lab. Acad Med 86:883-888.
26. Husmann PR, O'Loughlin VD, Braun MW. 2009. Quantitative and qualitative changes in teaching histology by means of virtual microscopy in an introductory course in human anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2:218-226.
27. Jonassen D. 1999. Designing constructivist learning environments. In: Reigeluth CM (Editor). Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Vol. II. 1st Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers. p 215-239.
28. Krathwohl DR. 2002. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theor Pract 41:212-218.
29. Krippendorf BB, Lough J. 2005. Complete and rapid switch from light microscopy to virtual microscopy for teaching medical histology. Anat Rec 285B:19-25.
30. Kühl T, Scheiter K, Gerjets P, Edelmann J. 2011a. The influence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations. Comput Hum Behav 27:29-35.
31. Kühl T, Scheiter K, Gerjets P, Gemballa S. 2011b. Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations? Comput Educ 56:176-187.
32. Lamberts K. 2009. Why do people remember dynamic images better than static images? Full Research Report. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), Swindon, United Kingdom. 32 p. URL: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-000-22-2694/outputs/Read/14f25aec-154c-4e62-9ac7-4ec1941ce298 [accessed 11 September 2015].
33. Lesage E, Valcke M, Sabbe E. 2013. Scoring methods for multiple choice assessment in higher education - Is it still a matter of number right scoring or negative marking? Stud Educ Eval 39:188-193.
34. Loftus GR. 1972. Eye fixations and recognition memory for pictures. Cognitive Psychol 3:525-551.
35. Lowe RK. 2003. Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learn Instr 13:157-176.
36. Mayer RE. 1989. Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. J Educ Psychol 81:240-246.
37. Mayer RE. 2001. Multimedia Learning. 1st Ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 210 p.
38. Mayer RE. 2003. The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learn Instr 13:125-139.
39. Merk M, Knuechel R, Perez-Bouza A. 2010. Web-based virtual microscopy at the RWTH Aachen University: Didactic concept, methods and analysis of acceptance by the students. Ann Anat 192:383-387.
40. Mione S, Valcke M, Cornelissen M. 2013. Evaluation of virtual microscopy in medical histology teaching. Anat Sci Educ 6:307-315.
41. Nazian SJ, Stevenson FT. 2013. The use of horizontal basic science proficiencies in a systems based curriculum. Med Sci Educ 23:2-5.
42. Nivala M, Säljö R, Rystedt H, Kronqvist P, Lehtinen E. 2012. Using virtual microscopy to scaffold learning of pathology: A naturalistic experiment on the role of visual and conceptual cues. Instr Sci 40:799-811.
43. Paulsen FP, Eichhorn M, Bräuer L. 2010. Virtual microscopy - The future of teaching histology in the medical curriculum? Ann Anat 192:378-382.
44. Pinder KE, Ford JC, Ovalle WK. 2008. A new paradigm for teaching histology laboratories in Canada's first distributed medical school. Anat Sci Educ 1:95-101.
45. Rayner K. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124:372-422.
46. Scoville SA, Buskirk TD. 2007. Traditional and virtual microscopy compared experimentally in a classroom setting. Clin Anat 20:565-570.
47. She HC, Chen YZ. 2009. The impact of multimedia effect on science learning: Evidence from eye movements. Comput Educ 53:1297-1307.
48. Tian Y, Xiao W, Li C, Liu Y, Qin M, Wu Y, Xiao L, Li H. 2014. Virtual microscopy system at Chinese medical university: An assisted teaching platform for promoting active learning and problem-solving skills. BMC Med Educ 14:74.
49. Valcke M. 2010. Onderwijskunde als ontwerpwetenschap. 1st Ed. Ghent, Belgium: Academia Press. 699 p.
50. Van der Veken J. 2008. In depth analysis of the impact on learning patterns and knowledge acquisition of a curriculum innovation in medical education. Doctorate of Philosophy Dissertation. Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. 105 p.
51. Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J. 2010. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: Design principles and strategies. Med Educ 44:85-93.
52. Vorstenbosch MA, Bouter ST, van den Hurk MM, Kooloos JG, Bolhuis SM, Laan RF. 2014. Exploring the validity of assessment in anatomy: Do images influence cognitive processes used in answering extended matching questions? Anat Sci Educ 7:107-116.
53. Vorstenbosch MA, Klaassen TP, Kooloos JG, Bolhuis SM, Laan RF. 2013. Do images influence assessment in anatomy? Exploring the effect of images on item difficulty and item discrimination. Anat Sci Educ 6:29-41.
54. Weatherall D. 2011. Science and medical education: Is it time to revisit Flexner? Med Educ 45:44-50.