The language of denial: text analysis reveals differences in language use between climate change proponents and skeptics

Climatic Change

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 597-605

  Medimorec, Srdan ^a   Pennycook, Gordon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

CLIMATE RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGES; LANGUAGE ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL SCIENCE; POLITICAL CONTROVERSIES; SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMUNICATION; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; LANGUAGE; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION;

EID: 84947865488     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: 15731480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1475-2     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adams Smith DE (1984) Medical discourse: aspects of author’s comment. ESP J 3:25–36
2. Anderegg WRL (2010) Moving beyond scientific agreement. Clim Chang 101:331–337
3. Anderegg WRL, Prall JW, Harold J, Schneider SHS (2010) Expert credibility in climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:12107–12109
4. Anderegg WR, Callaway ES, Boykoff MT, Yohe G, Root TYL (2014) Awareness of both type 1 and 2 errors in climate science and assessment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95:1445–1451
5. Anthony L (2012) AntConc (Version 3.3.5) [Computer Software]. Available from http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/
6. Baayen H, Piepenbrock R,van Rijn H (1993) The CELEX database on CD-ROM. (Linguistic Data Consortium)
7. Biber D, Conrad S (2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge Univ Press, New York
8. Biber D, Gray B (2010) Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: complexity, elaboration, explicitness. J Eng Acad Purp 9:2–20
9. Biber D, Gray B (2013) Nominalizing the verb phrase in academic science writing. In: Aarts B, Close J, Leech G, Wallis S (eds) The verb phrase in english: investigating recent language change with corpora. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 99–132
10. Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the U.S. prestige press. Glob Environ Chang 15:125–136
11. Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: a case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38:1190–1204
12. Bray D (2010) The scientific consensus of climate change revisited. Environ Sci Pol 13:340–350
13. Brysse K, Oreskes N, O’Reilly J, Oppenheimer M (2013) Climate change prediction: erring on the side of least drama? Glob Environ Chang 23:327–337
14. Coltheart M (1981) The MRC psycholinguistic database. Q J Exp Psych 33:497–505
15. Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Way R, Jacobs P, Skuce A (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8:1–7
16. Crossley SA, McNamara DS (2011) Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: coh-metrix analyses of first and second language writing. Int J Continuing Eng Educ Life Long Learn 21:170–191
17. Ding D, Maibach EW, Zhao X, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A (2011) Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nat Clim Chang 1:462–466
18. Doran PT, Zimmerman MK (2009) Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos Trans AGU 90:22–23
19. Dunlap RE, Jacques PJ (2013) Climate change denial books and conservative think tanks: exploring the connection. Am Behav Sci 57:699–731
20. Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of climate change. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, pp 144–160
21. Fløttum K, Dahl T (2012) Different contexts, different “stories”? A linguistic comparison of two development reports on climate change. Lang Comm 32:14–23
22. Freudenberg WR, Muselli V (2010) Global warming estimates, media expectations, and the asymmetry of scientific challenge. Glob Environ Chang 20:483–491
23. Freudenburg WR, Muselli V (2013) Reexamining climate change debates scientific disagreement or Scientific Certainty Argumentation Methods (SCAMs)? Am Behav Sci 57:777–795
24. Gosden H (1993) Discourse functions of subject in scientific research articles. Appl Ling 14:56–75
25. Graesser AC, McNamara DS, Kulikowich JM (2011) Coh-metrix providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educ Res 40:223–234
26. Graesser AC, McNamara DS, Cai Z, Conley M, Li H, Pennebaker J (2014) Coh-metrix measures text characteristics at multiple levels of language and discourse. Elem Sch J 115:210–229
27. Halliday MAK (1979) Differences between spoken and written language: some implications for language teaching. In G. Page et al. (eds) Communication through reading: Proceedings of the 4th Australian reading conference (pp. 37–52). Adelaide: Australian Reading Association
28. Halliday MAK, Martin JR (1993) Writing science: literacy and discursive power. Falmer Press
29. Hyland K (1998) Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins Publishers, Amsterdam
30. Hyland K (2005) Prudence, precision, and politeness: hedges in academic writing. In M.A. Olivares Pardo & F. Suau Jiménez (Eds.). Las lenguas de especialidad: Nuevas perspectivas de investigación (Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis Linguistics 10, pp. 99–112). Valencia: Universitat de València
31. Idso CD, Singer SF (2009) Climate change reconsidered: 2009 report of the nongovernmental panel on climate change (NIPCC). The Heartland Institute, Chicago
32. Idso CD, Carter RM, Singer SF (eds) (2011) Climate change reconsidered: 2011 interim report of the nongovernmental panel on climate change (NIPCC). The Heartland Institute, Chicago
33. Idso CD, Carter RM, Singer SF (eds) (2013) Climate change reconsidered II: physical science. The Heartland Institute, Chicago
34. IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (2007) In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY
35. IPCC, 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Stocker TF, D Qin G-K Plattner M, Tignor SK, Allen J, Boschung A, Nauels Y, Xia V Bex and P.M. Midgley (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp. (2013)
36. Jacques P, Dunlap RE, Freeman M (2008) The organization of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environ Poli 17:349–85
37. Jankó F, Móricz N, Vancsó JP (2014) Reviewing the climate change reviewers: exploring controversy through report references and citations. Geoforum 56:17–34
38. Lambert C, Robinson P (2014) Learning to perform narrative tasks: a semester-long classroom study of L2 task sequencing effects. Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. In Baralt M, Gilabert R, Robinson P (eds) Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. 207–230. Bloomsbury Academic
39. Landauer TK, Foltz PW, Laham D (1998) Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Proc 25:259–284
40. Lewandowsky S, Oreskes N, Risbey JS, Newell BR, Smithson M (2015). Seepage: climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community. Glob Environ Chang
41. McCarthy PM, Jarvis S (2010) MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: a validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behav Res Methods 42:381–392
42. McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2003) Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Soc Probl 50:348–373
43. McCright AM, Dunlap RE, Xiao C (2013) Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Clim Chang 119:511–518
44. McNamara DS, Graesser AC, McCarthy PM, Cai Z (2014) Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
45. Oreskes N (2004) The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306:1686–1687
46. Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Defeating the merchants of doubt. Nature 465:686–687
47. Parkinson J, Musgrave J (2014) Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. J Engl Acad Purp 14:48–59
48. Robinson M, Stoller F, Costanza-Robinson M, Jones J (2008) Write like a chemist: a guide and resource. Oxford University Press, New York
49. Rosenberg S, Vedlitz A, Cowman D, Zahran S (2010) Climate change: a profile of U.S. climate scientists’ perspectives. Clim Chang 101:3–4
50. Singer SF (ed) (2008) Nature, not human activity, rules the climate: summary for policymakers of the report of the nongovernmental international panel on climate change. The Heartland Institute, Chicago
51. Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J Lang Soc Psychol 29:24–54
52. van der Linden S, Leiserowitz A, Feinberg G, Maibach E (2015) The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence. PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118489
53. Zehr SC (2000) Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst Sci 9:85–103
54. Zeiger X (1999) Essentials of writing biomedical research papers. McGraw-Hill, New York