Longitudinal change in performance on the montreal cognitive assessment in older adults

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 824-835

  Cooley, Sarah A ^a   Heaps, Jodi M ^a,b   Bolzenius, Jacob D ^a   Salminen, Lauren E ^a   Baker, Laurie M ^a   Scott, Staci E ^a   Paul, Robert H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b MISSOURI INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; MoCA; Neuropsychological assessment; Practice effects

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84947864017     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: 17444144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1087596     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abner, E. L., Dennis, B. C., Mathews, M. J., Mendiondo, M. S., Caban-Holt, A., Kryscio, R. J.,. for the SELECT Investigators. (2012). Practice effects in a longitudinal, multi-center Alzheimers disease prevention clinical trial. Trials, 13, 1-7. 10.1186/1745-6215-13-217
2. Bernstein, I. H., Lacritz, L., Barlow, C. E., Weiner, M. F., &, DeFina, L. F. (2011). Psychometric evaluation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in three diverse samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25, 119-126. 10.1080/13854046.2010.533196
3. Calamia, M., Markon, K., &, Tranel, D. (2012). Scoring higher the second time around: Meta-analyses of practice effects in neuropsychological assessment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26, 543-570. 10.1080/13854046.2012.680913
4. Chelune, G. J., Naugle, R. I., Lüders, H., Sedlak, J., &, Awad, I. A. (1993). Individual change after epilepsy surgery: Practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology, 7, 41-52. 10.1037/0894-4105.7.1.41
5. Chertkow, H., Nasreddine, Z., Johns, E., Phillips, N., &, McHenry, C. (2011). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Validation of alternate forms and new recommendations for education corrections [supplemental material]. Alzheimers & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimers Association, 7, S157.
6. Collie, A., Maruff, P., Darby, D. G., &, McStephen, M. (2003). The effects of practice on the cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals assessed at brief test-retest intervals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 419-428.
7. Costa, A. S., Fimm, B., Friesen, P., Soundjock, H., Rottschy, C., Gross, T.,., Reetz, K. (2012). Alternate-form reliability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening test in a clinical setting. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 33, 379-384
8. Dong, Y., Thompson, C. L., Huey Joanne Tan, S., Ben Swie Lim, L., Pang, W., &, Li-Hsian Chen, C. (2013). Test-retest reliability, convergent validity and practice effects of the RBANS in a memory clinic setting: A pilot study. Open Journal of Medical Psychology, 2, 11-16. 10.4236/ojmp.2013.24B003
9. Duff, K., Beglinger, L. J., Schoenberg, M. R., Patton, D. E., Mold, J., Scott, J. G., &, Adams, R. L. (2005). Test-retest stability and practice effects of the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 565-575. 10.1080/13803390490918363
10. Duff, K., Hobson, V. L., Beglinger, L. J., &, OBryant, S. E. (2010). Diagnostic accuracy of the RBANS in mild cognitive impairment: Limitations on assessing milder impairments. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25, 429-441. 10.1093/arclin/acq045
11. Duff, K., Humphreys-Clark, J. D., OBryant, S. E., Mold, J. W., Schiffer, R. B., &, Sutker, P. B. (2008). Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer's disease: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23, 603-612. 10.1016/j.acn.2008.06.004
12. Falleti, M. G., Maruff, P., Collie, A., &, Darby, D. G. (2006). Practice effects associated with the repeated assessment of cognitive function using the CogState battery at 10-minute, one week and one month test-retest intervals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 1095-1112. 10.1080/13803390500205718
13. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., &, McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
14. Freitas, S., Simões, M. R., Alves, L., &, Santana, I. (2013). Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validation study for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 27, 37-43. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182420bfe
15. Gagnon, J. F., Postuma, R. B., Joncas, S., Desjardins, C., &, Latreille, V. (2010). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: A screening tool for mild cognitive impairment in REM sleep behavior disorder. Movement Disorders, 25, 936-940. 10.1002/mds.23079
16. Galasko, D., Abramson, I., Corey-Bloom, J., &, Thal, L. J. (1993). Repeated exposure to the Mini-Mental State Examination and the information-memory-concentration test results in a practice effect in Alzheimers disease. Neurology, 43, 1559-1559. 10.1212/WNL.43.8.1559
17. Helkala, E. L., Kivipelto, M., Hallikainen, M., Alhainen, K., Heinonen, H., Tuomilehto, J.,., Nissinen, A. (2002). Usefulness of repeated presentation of Mini-Mental State Examination as a diagnostic procedure-A population-based study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 106, 341-346. 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.01315.x
18. Hoops, S., Nazem, S., Siderowf, A. D., Duda, J. E., Xie, S. X., Stern, M. B., &, Weintraub, D. (2009). Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology, 73, 1738-1745. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34b47
19. Jacqmin-Gadda, H., Fabrigoule, C., Commenges, D., &, Dartigues, J. F. (1997). A 5-year longitudinal study of the Mini-Mental State Examination in normal aging. American Journal of Epidemiology, 145, 498-506. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009137
20. Lovibond, S. H., &, Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation. ISBN 7334-1423-0.
21. Luis, C. A., Keegan, A. P., &, Mullan, M. (2009). Cross validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in community dwelling older adults residing in the Southeastern US. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 197-201. 10.1002/gps.v24:2
22. Machulda, M. M., Pankratz, V. S., Christianson, T. J., Ivnik, R. J., Mielke, M. M., Roberts, R. O.,., Petersen, R. C. (2013). Practice effects and longitudinal cognitive change in normal aging vs. incident mild cognitive impairment and dementia in the Mayo clinic study of aging. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27, 1247-1264. 10.1080/13854046.2013.836567
23. Mathews, M., Abner, E., Caban-Holt, A., Kryscio, R., &, Schmitt, F. (2013). CERAD practice effects and attrition bias in a dementia prevention trial. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 1115-1123.
24. McLennan, S. N., Mathias, J. L., Brennan, L. C., &, Stewart, S. (2011). Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a screening test for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in a cardiovascular population. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 24, 83-88.
25. Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I.,., Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695-699. 10.1111/jgs.2005.53.issue-4
26. Olson, R. A., Chhanabhai, T., &, McKenzie, M. (2008). Feasibility study of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in patients with brain metastases. Supportive Care in Cancer, 16, 1273-1278. 10.1007/s00520-008-0431-3
27. Pendlebury, S. T., Cuthbertson, F. C., Welch, S. J., Mehta, Z., &, Rothwell, P. M. (2010). Underestimation of cognitive impairment by Mini-Mental State Examination versus the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with transient ischemic attack and stroke: A population-based study. Stroke, 41, 1290-1293. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.579888
28. Randolph, C. (1998). Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
29. Randolph, C., Tierney, M. C., Mohr, E., &, Chase, T. N. (1998). The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Preliminary clinical validity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section A), 20, 310-319. 10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823
30. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., &, Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In J. P. Robinson & S. Wrightsman. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50005-8
31. Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350-353. 10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350
32. Sekaran, U. (2005). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
33. Toh, E. A., MacAskill, M. R., Dalrymple-Alford, J. C., Myall, D. J., Livingston, L., Macleod, S. A., &, Anderson, T. J. (2014). Comparison of cognitive and UHDRS measures in monitoring disease progression in Huntingtons disease: A 12-month longitudinal study. Translational Neurodegeneration, 3, 1-10. 10.1186/2047-9158-3-15
34. Waldron-Perrine, B., &, Axelrod, B. N. (2012). Determining an appropriate cutting score for indication of impairment on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry., 27, 1189-1194. 10.1002/gps.v27.11
35. Wilkinson, G. S., &, Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide Range Achievement Test 4 Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.