A thematic hierarchy for efficient generation from lexical-conceptual structure

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1529, Issue , 1998, Pages 333-343

  Dorr, Bonnie ^a   Habash, Nizar ^a   Traum, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION;

CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES; DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS; ROLE ASSIGNMENT; SURFACE POSITIONS; TARGET LANGUAGE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84947752978     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-49478-2_30     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. A. Alsina and S.A. Mchombo. Object Asymmetries and the Chichewa Applicative Construction. In S.A. Mchombo, editor, Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation, pages 1-46. CSLI Publications, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, 1993.
2. C.L. Baker. English Syntax. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989.
3. J. Bresnan and J. Kanerva. Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 20:1-50, 1989.
4. J. Carrier-Duncan. Linking of Thematic Roles in Derivational Word Formation.Linguistic Inquiry, 16:1-34, 1985.
5. Bonnie J. Dorr. Large-Scale Acquisition of LCS-Based Lexicons for Foreign Lan-guage Tutoring. In Proceedings of the ACL Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP), pages 139-146, Washington, DC, 1997.
6. Bonnie J. Dorr, James Hendler, Scott Blanksteen, and Barrie Migdalof. Use of Lexical Conceptual Structure for Intelligent Tutoring. Technical Report UMIACS TR 93-108, CS TR 3161, University of Maryland, 1993.
7. A. Giorgi. Toward a Theory of Long Distance Anaphors: A GB Approach. The Linguistic Review, 3:307-361, 1984.
8. J. Grimshaw and A. Mester. Light Verbs and Theta-Marking. Linguistic Inquiry, 19:205-232, 1988.
9. Ray Jackendo.Grammatical Relations and Functional Structure. In Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1972.
10. Ray Jackendo.Semantics and Cognition. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983. E_cient Generation from Lexical-Conceptual Structure 343
11. Ray Jackendo.Semantic Structures. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
12. Ray Jackendo.The Proper Treatment of Measuring Out, Telicity, and Perhaps Even Quanti_cation in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14:305- 354, 1996.
13. P. Kiparsky. Morphology and Grammatical Relations. unpublished ms., Stanford University, 1985.
14. Kevin Knight and Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou. Two-Level, Many-Paths Generation. In Proceedings of ACL-91, pages 143-151, 1991b.
15. Irene Langkilde and Kevin Knight. Generating Word Lattices from Abstract Mea-ning Representation. Technical report, Information Science Institute, University of Southern California, 1998.
16. Irene Langkilde and Kevin Knight. Generation that Exploits Corpus-Based Stati-stical Knowledge. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL '98, pages 704-710, 1998.
17. Irene Langkilde and Kevin Knight. The Practical Value of N-Grams in Generation. In International Natural Language Generation Workshop, 1998.
18. R.K. Larson. On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19:335-391, 1989.
19. Beth Levin. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation.University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1993.
20. Beth Levin and Malka Rappaport-Hovav. From Lexical Semantics to Argument Realization. Technical report, Northwestern University, 1996.
21. T. Nishgauchi. Control and the Thematic Domain. Language, 60:215-260, 1984.
22. W. Wilkins, editor. Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic Relations. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1988.