Validation of an obstetric comorbidity index in an external population

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 122, Issue 13, 2015, Pages 1748-1755

  Metcalfe, A ^a   Lix, L M ^b   Johnson, J A ^a   Currie, G ^a   Lyon, A W ^c   Bernier, F ^a   Tough, S C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Comorbidity; International Classification of Diseases; pregnancy; prevalence; validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL ABUSE; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; CANADA; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY ASSESSMENT; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG ABUSE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; HYPERTENSION; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; KIDNEY DISEASE; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; OBSTETRIC COMORBIDITY INDEX; PLACENTA PREVIA; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREECLAMPSIA; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY HYPERTENSION; RATING SCALE; SICKLE CELL ANEMIA; SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS; VALIDATION PROCESS; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; COMORBIDITY; DELIVERY; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; CANADA; COMORBIDITY; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREGNANCY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84947618268     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13254     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bennett TA, Kotelchuck M, Cox CE, Tucker MJ, Nadeau DA,. Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States in 1991 and 1992: a comprehensive view of maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 346-54.
2. Aron DC, Harper DL, Shepardson LB, Rosenthal GE,. Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 279: 1968-72.
3. Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM,. Maternal-fetal conditions necessitating a medical intervention resulting in preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1557-63.
4. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR,. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373-83.
5. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM,. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998; 36: 8-27.
6. Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Hernandez-Diaz S, Huybrechts KF, Fischer MA, Creanga AA, et al., Development of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 957-65.
7. Metcalfe A, Lyon AW, Johnson JA, Bernier F, Currie G, Lix LM, et al., Improving completeness of ascertainment and quality of information for pregnancies through linkage of administrative and clinical data records. Ann Epidemiol 2013; 23: 444-7.
8. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Cardenas V, Nelson JC, Easterling TR, Gardella C, et al., The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 125-34.
9. Bruce FC, Berg CJ, Joski PJ, Roblin DW, Callaghan WM, Bulkley JE, et al., Extent of maternal morbidity in a managed care population in Georgia. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012; 26: 497-505.
10. Baldwin LM, Klabunde CN, Green P, Barlow W, Wright G,. In search of the perfect comorbidity measure for use with administrative claims data: does it exist? Med Care 2006; 44: 745-53.
11. Sarfati D, Hill S, Purdie G, Dennett E, Blakely T,. How well does routine hospitalisation data capture information on comorbidity in New Zealand? N Z Med J 2010; 123: 50-61.
12. Romano PS, Yasmeen S, Schembri ME, Keyzer JM, Gilbert WM,. Coding of perineal lacerations and other complications of obstetric care in hospital discharge data. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 717-25.
13. Yasmeen S, Romano PS, Schembri ME, Keyzer JM, Gilbert WM,. Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 992-1001.
14. Taylor LK, Travis S, Pym M, Olive E, Henderson-Smart DJ,. How useful are hospital morbidity data for monitoring conditions occurring in the perinatal period? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45: 36-41.
15. Andrade SE, Moore Simas TA, Boudreau D, Raebel MA, Toh S, Syat B, et al., Validation of algorithms to ascertain clinical conditions and medical procedures used during pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2011; 20: 1168-76.
16. Bacak SJ, Callaghan WM, Dietz PM, Crouse C,. Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States, 1999-2000. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 592-7.
17. Chen JS, Roberts CL, Simpson JM, Ford JB,. Use of hospitalisation history (lookback) to determine prevalence of chronic diseases: impact on modelling of risk factors for haemorrhage in pregnancy. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 68.
18. Joseph KS, Fahey J,. Validation of perinatal data in the Discharge Abstract Database of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Chronic Dis Can 2009; 29: 96-100.
19. Hadfield RM, Lain SJ, Cameron CA, Bell JC, Morris JM, Roberts CL,. The prevalence of maternal medical conditions during pregnancy and a validation of their reporting in hospital discharge data. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48: 78-82.
20. Li B, Evans D, Faris P, Dean S, Quan H,. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 12.
21. Nadathur SG,. Comorbidity indexes from administrative datasets: what is measured? Aust Health Rev 2011; 35: 507-11.