Validation of algorithms to ascertain clinical conditions and medical procedures used during pregnancy

Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1168-1176

  Andrade, Susan E ^a   Moore Simas, Tiffany A ^b   Boudreau, Denise ^c   Raebel, Marsha A ^d   Toh, Sengwee ^e   Syat, Beth ^e   Dashevsky, Inna ^e   Platt, Richard ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Administrative databases; Positive predictive value; Pregnancy; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; DIABETES MELLITUS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OBESITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOM SAMPLE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; INSURANCE CLAIM REVIEW; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OBESITY; OBSTETRICS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIALIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860424071     PISSN: 10538569     EISSN: 10991557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pds.2217     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andrade SE, Gurwitz JH, Chan KA, et al. Validation of diagnoses of peptic ulcers and bleeding from administrative databases: a multi-health maintenance organization study. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 310-313.
2. th codes for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation in the Sistema Informativo Sanitario Regionale database. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 499-502.
3. Harrold LR, Yood R, Andrade S, et al. Evaluating the validity of osteoarthritis diagnoses in an administrative database. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 1881-1885.
4. Harrold LR, Saag KG, Yood RA, et al. Validity of gout diagnoses in administrative data. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 103-108.
5. Hux JE, Flintoft V, Ivis F, Bica A. Diabetes in Ontario - determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 512-516.
6. Newton KM, Wagner EH, Ramsey SD, et al. The use of automated data to identify complications and comorbidities of diabetes: a validation study. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 199-207.
7. Raiford DS, Perez Gutthann S, Garcia Rodriguez LA. Positive predictive value of ICD-9 codes in the identification of cases of complicated peptic ulcer disease in the Saskatchewan hospital automated database. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 101-104.
8. Selby JV, Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Ferrara A, Liu J. Developing a prediction rule from automated clinical databases to identify high-risk patients in a large population with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1547-1555.
9. De Coster C, Li B, Quan H. Comparison and validity of procedures coded with ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CA/CCI. Med Care 2008; 46: 627-634.
10. th revision, clinical modification administrative data. Med Care 2004; 42: 801-809.
11. Fisher ES, Whaley FS, Krushat WM, et al. The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 243-248.
12. Romano PS, Mark DH. Bias in the coding of hospital discharge data and its implications for quality assessment. Med Care 1994; 32: 81-90.
13. Wright SB, Huskins WC, Dokholyan RS, Goldmann DA, Platt R. Administrative databases provide inaccurate data for surveillance of long-term central venous catheter-associated infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003; 24: 946-949.
14. Zhan C, Elixhauser A, Richards CL Jr, et al. Identification of hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infections from Medicare claims: sensitivity and positive predictive value. Med Care 2009; 47: 364-369.
15. American Academy of Family Physicians. Coding for intrapartum and other maternity care. (Accessed May 15, 2011).
16. th edition, In: Strom B, (ed.). Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2005; pp. 261-269.
17. Raebel MA, Ellis JL, Andrade SE. Evaluation of gestational age and admission date assumptions used to determine prenatal drug exposure from administrative data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2005; 14: 829-836.
18. Beckmann CR. Ectopic pregnancy and abortion. In Obstetric and Gynecology, Sixth Edition Beckmann CR (ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, 2010; pp. 141-150.
19. Pazol K, Zane SB, Parker WY, et al. Abortion surveillance - United States, 2007. MMWR 2011; 60(1): 1-39.
20. Wacholder S, Chen BE, Wilcox A, et al. Risk of miscarriage with bivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18: pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2010; 340: c712.
21. Beckmann CR. Common medical problems in pregnancy. In Obstetric and Gynecology, Sixth Edition Beckmann CR (ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, 2010; pp. 151-164.
22. Nicholson WK, Wilson LM, Witkop CT, et al. Therapeutic Management, Delivery, and Postpartum Risk Assessment and Screening in Gestational Diabetes, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 162 (Prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0018). AHRQ Publication No. 08-E004, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. March 2008.
23. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: The Evidence Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. NIH Publication No. 98-4083, September 1998.
24. Dabelea D, Snell-Bergeon JK, Hartsfield CL, Bischoff KJ, Hamman RF, McDuffie RS. Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) over time and by birth cohort: Kaiser Permanente of Colorado GDM Screening Program. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 579-584.
25. Hunt KJ, Schuller KL. The increasing prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2007; 34: 173.
26. Lawrence JM, Contreras R, Chen W, Sacks DA. Trends in the prevalence of pregestational diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus among a racially/ethnically diverse population of pregnant women, 1999-2005. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 899-904.
27. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Cardenas V, et al. The reporting of pre-exissting maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 125-134.
28. Yasmeen S, Romano P, Schembri ME, Keyzer JM, Gilbert WM. Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 992-1001.
29. Ferrara A, Kahn HS, Quesenberry CP, Riley C, Hedderson MM. An increase in the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus: Northern California, 1991-2000. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 526-533.
30. Jovanovic L, Pettitt DJ. Gestational diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2001; 286: 2516-2518.
31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, 2008.
32. Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(10): 1862-1868.
33. Vahratian A. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among women of childbearing age: results from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Matern Child Health J 2009; 13: 268-273.
34. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, McDowell MA, Taback CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA 2006; 295: 1549-1555.
35. Chu SY, Callaghan WM, Bish CL, D'Angelo D. Gestation weight gain by body mass index among US women delivering live births. 2004-2005: fueling future obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 271.e1-271.e7.
36. Bhattacharya S, Campbell DM, Liston WA, Bhattacharya S. Effect of body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering singleton babies. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 168.
37. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Park MM. National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 50. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics, 2002. Births: final data for 2000.
38. Siddique J, Lauderedale DS, VanderWeele TJ, Lantos JD. Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States 1995 to 2006. Med Care 2009; 47: 1129-1135.
39. Reddy UM, Filly RA, Copel JA. Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 145-157.
40. Dunne F, Brydon P, Smith K, Gee H. Pregnancy in women with Type 2 diabetes: 12years outcome data 1990-2002. Diabet Med. 2003; 20(9): 734-738.
41. Inkster ME, Fahey TP, Donnan PT, Leese GP, Mires GJ, Murphy DJ. Poor glycated haemoglobin control and adverse pregnancy outcomes in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review of observational studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2006; 6: 30.
42. Temple R, Aldridge V, Greenwood R, Heyburn P, Sampson M, Stanley K. Association between outcome of pregnancy and glycaemic control in early pregnancy in type 1 diabetes: population based study. BMJ 2002; 325(7375): 1275-1276.
43. Lashen H, Fear K, Sturdee DW. Obesity is associated with increased risk of first trimester and recurrent miscarriage: matched case-control study. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(7): 1644-1646.
44. Metwally M, Saravelos SH, Ledger WL, Li TC. Body mass index and risk of miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2010; 94(1): 290-295.