The number of scholarly documents on the public web

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Khabsa, Madian ^a   Giles, C Lee ^a,b  

^a The Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; AGRICULTURE; ART; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; COMPUTER; ECONOMICS; ENGINEERING; ENVIRONMENT; GEOSCIENCE; HUMANITIES; INTERNET; MATERIAL SCIENCE; MATHEMATICS; MEDICINE; PHYSICS; SCHOLARLY DOCUMENT; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SEARCH ENGINE; SOCIOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PUBLICATION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ECONOMICS; HUMANITIES; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; MEDICINE; PHYSICS; PUBLICATIONS; SCIENCE; SEARCH ENGINE;

EID: 84901218198     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093949     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Web of Science fact page. Available: http://wokinfo.com/realfacts/ qualityandquantity/.
2. Based on the statistics reported at the homepage of Microsoft Academic Search as of January 10, 2013. Available: http://academic.research.microsoft. com.
3. Bar-Ilan J (2008)Which h-index? a comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 74: 257-271.
4. Bar-Ilan J (2010) Citations to the introduction to informetrics indexed byWOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 82: 495-506.
5. Björk BC, Roos A, Lauri M (2009) Scientific journal publishing - yearly volume and open access availability. Information Research 14: 391.
6. Noorden RV (2013) Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Nature 495: 426-429.
7. Lawrence S, Giles C (1998) Searching the world wide web. Science 280: 98-100. (Pubitemid 28169089)
8. Lawrence S, Giles C (1999) Accessibility of information on the web. Nature 400: 107-9. (Pubitemid 29327520)
9. Bharat K, Broder A (1998) A technique for measuring the relative size and overlap of public web search engines. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30: 379-388.
10. Dobra A, Fienberg SE (2004) How large is the world wide web. Web Dynamics: 23-44.
11. Broder AZ, Glassman SC, Manasse MS, Zweig G (1997) Syntactic clustering of the web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 29: 1157-1166.
12. Norris M, Oppenheim C, Rowland F (2008) The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 1963-1972.
13. Hogg R, Tanis E (2010) Probability and Statistical Inference. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
14. Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Larivière V, Gingras Y, Carr L, et al. (2010) Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PloS ONE 5: e13636.
15. Hajjem C, Harnad S, Gingras Y (2005) Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 28: 39-47.
16. Björk BC, Welling P, Laakso M, Majlender P, Hedlund T, et al. (2010) Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009. PloS one 5: e11273.
17. Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T (1999) The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical Report 1999-66, Stanford InfoLab.