Corrigendum: Exploration of alginate hydrogel/nano zinc oxide composite bandages for infected wounds(Int J Nanomedicine, 2015, 10, (suppl 1), (53-66), 10.2147/IJN.S79981);Exploration of alginate hydrogel/nano zinc oxide composite bandages for infected wounds

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 10, Issue , 2015, Pages 53-56

  Mohandas, Annapoorna ^a   Sudheesh Kumar, P T ^a   Raja, Biswas ^a   Lakshmanan, Vinoth Kumar ^a   Jayakumar, Rangasamy ^a  

^a AMRITA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Alginate; Antimicrobial activity; Hemostatic; Hydrogel; Wound healing; ZnO nanoparticle

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM ALGINATE; CHITOSAN; ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; ALGINIC ACID; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; GLUCURONIC ACID; HEXURONIC ACID; HYDROGEL; NANOPARTICLE; ZINC OXIDE;

ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BANDAGE; BIODEGRADATION; BLOOD CLOTTING; CANDIDA ALBICANS; CELL ADHESION; CELL INFILTRATION; CELL VIABILITY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION KINETICS; EPITHELIZATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EX VIVO STUDY; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; KERATINOCYTE; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; MICROFLORA; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SKIN FIBROBLAST; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SWELLING; WOUND HEALING; WOUND INFECTION; X RAY DIFFRACTION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; EPITHELIUM; FIBROBLAST; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; MICROBIOLOGY; STAINING; THERAPEUTIC USE;

ALGINATES; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; BANDAGES; BLOOD COAGULATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL SURVIVAL; EPITHELIUM; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FIBROBLASTS; GLUCURONIC ACID; HEMOSTASIS; HEXURONIC ACIDS; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; NANOPARTICLES; POROSITY; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; STAINING AND LABELING; WOUND INFECTION; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 84947548515     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S208590     Document Type: Erratum

References (54)

1. Kiwanuka E, Junker J, Eriksson E. Harnessing growth factors to influence wound healing. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39(3):239-248.
2. Ben Amar M, Wu M. Re-epithelialization: Advancing epithelium frontier during wound healing. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11(93):20131038.
3. Harishkumar M, Masatoshi Y, Hiroshi S, Tsuyomu I, Masugi M. Revealing the mechanism of in vitro wound healing properties of citrus tamurana extract. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:963457.
4. Ninan N, Muthiah M, Park IK, et al. Faujasites incorporated tissue engineering scaffolds for wound healing: in vitro and in vivo analysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5(21):11194-11206.
5. Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Kumar PT, Nair SV, Tamura H. Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29(3):322-337.
6. Daeschlein G. Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management. Int Wound J. 2013;10 Suppl 1:9-14.
7. Sofokleous P, Stride E, Edirisinghe M. Preparation, characterization, and release of amoxicillin from electrospun fibrous wound dressing patches. Pharm Res. 2013;30(7):1926-1938.
8. Dong Y, Hassan WU, Kennedy R, et al. Performance of an in situ formed bioactive hydrogel dressing from a PEG-based hyperbranched multifunctional copolymer. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(5): 2076-2085.
9. Mogosanu GD, Grumezescu AM. Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing. Int J Pharm. 2014;463(2):127-136.
10. Kanokpanont S, Damrongsakkul S, Ratanavaraporn J, Aramwit P. An innovative bi-layered wound dressing made of silk and gelatin for accelerated wound healing. Int J Pharm. 2012;436(1-2):141-153.
11. Ji F, Lin W, Wang Z, et al. Development of nonstick and drugloaded wound dressing based on the hydrolytic hydrophobic poly(carboxybetaine) ester analogue. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013; 5(21):10489-10494.
12. Broussard KC, Powers JG. Wound dressings: selecting the most appropriate type. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013;14(6):449-459.
13. Abdelrahman T, Newton H. Wound dressings: principles and practice. Surgery. 2011;29(10):491-495.
14. Costache MC, Qu H, Ducheyne P, Devore DI. Polymer-xerogel composites for controlled release wound dressings. Biomaterials. 2010;31(24):6336-6343.
15. Rossi S, Faccendini A, Bonferoni MC, et al. Sponge-like dressings based on biopolymers for the delivery of platelet lysate to skin chronic wounds. Int J Pharm. 2013;440(2):207-215.
16. Elsner JJ, Egozi D, Ullmann Y, et al. Novel biodegradable composite wound dressings with controlled release of antibiotics: Results in a guinea pig burn model. Burns. 2011;37(5):896-904.
17. Fonder MA, Lazarus GS, Cowan DA, et al. Treating the chronic wound: A practical approach to the care of non healing wounds and wound care dressings. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(2):185-206.
18. Silva R, Ferreira H, Matamá T, Gomes AC, Cavaco-Paulo A. Woundhealing evaluation of entrapped active agents into protein microspheres over cellulosic gauzes. Biotechnol J. 2012;7(11):1376-1385.
19. Jones V, Grey JE, Harding KG. Wound dressings. BMJ. 2006;332(7544): 777-780.
20. Unnithan AR, Barakat NA, Pichiah PB, et al. Wound-dressing materials with antibacterial activity from electrospun polyurethane-dextran nanofiber mats containing ciprofloxacin HCl. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;90(4):1786-1793.
21. Lalit V. Role of natural polysaccharides in radiation formation of PVA-hydrogel wound dressing. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research. 2007;255(2):343-349.
22. Kokabi M, Sirousazar M, Hassan ZM. PVA-clay nanocomposite hydrogels for wound dressing. Eur Polym J. 2007;43(3):773-781.
23. Pandey A, Pandey GC, Aswath PB. Synthesis of polylactic acidpolyglycolic acid blends using microwave radiation. J Mech Behav Biomed. 2008;1(3):227-233.
24. Aoki S, Kinoshita M, Miyazaki H, et al. Application of poly-L-lactic acid nanosheet as a material for wound dressing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(2):236-240.
25. Pechter PM, Gil J, Valdes J, et al. Keratin dressings speed epithelialization of deep partial-thickness wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2012; 20(2):236-242.
26. Sohnle PG, Collins- Lech C, Wiessner JH. The Zinc-Reversible Antimicrobial Activity of Neutrophil Lysates and Abscess Fluid Supernatants. J Infect Dis. 1991;164(1):137-142.
27. Sudheesh Kumar PT, Abhilash S, Manzoor K, Nair SV, Tamura H, Jayakumar R. Preparation and characterization of novel ß-chitin/nano silver composite scaffolds for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;80(3):761-767.
28. Anisha BS, Biswas R, Chennazhi KP, Jayakumar R. Chitosan-hyaluronic acid/nano silver composite sponges for drug resistant bacteria infected diabetic wounds. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013;62:310-320.
29. Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Nair SV, Tamura H. Novel chitin and chitosan nanofibers in biomedical applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2010; 28(1):142-150.
30. Jayakumar R, Menon D, Manzoor K, et al. Biomedical applications of chitin and chitosan based nanomaterials-a short review. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;82(2):227-232.
31. Wang T, Zhu XK, Xue XT, Wu DY. Hydrogel sheets of chitosan, honey and gelatin as burn wound dressings. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88(1): 75-83.
32. Azad AK, Sermsintham N, Chandrkrachang S, Stevens WF. Chitosan membrane as a wound-healing dressing: characterization and clinical application. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;69(2): 216-222.
33. Adhirajan N, Shanmugasundaram N, Shanmuganathan S, Babu M. Collagen-based wound dressing for doxycycline delivery: in-vivo evaluation in an infected excisional wound model in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2009;61(12):1617-1623.
34. Zhao R, Li X, Sun B, et al. Electrospun chitosan/sericin composite nanofibers with antibacterial property as potential wound dressings. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;68:92-97.
35. Paul W, Sharma CP. Chitosan and alginate wound dressings: A short review. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2004;18(1):18-23.
36. Gu Z, Xie H, Huang C, Li L, Yu X. Preparation of chitosan/silk fibroin blending membrane fixed with alginate dialdehyde for wound dressing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013;58:121-126.
37. Sarker B, Singh R, Silva R, et al. Evaluation of fibroblasts adhesion and proliferation on alginate-gelatin crosslinked hydrogel. PLoS One. 2014:9(9):e107952.
38. Pereira R, Carvalho A, Vaz DC, et al. Development of novel alginate based hydrogel films for wound healing applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013;52:221-230.
39. Thu HE, Zulfakar MH, Ng SF. Alginate based bilayer hydrocolloid films as potential slow-release modern wound dressing. Int J Pharm. 2012;434(1-2):375-383.
40. Goh CH, Heng PW, Huang EP, Li BK, Chan LW. Interactions of antimicrobial compounds with cross-linking agents of alginate dressings. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;62(1):105-118.
41. Shalumon KT, Anulekha KH, Nair SV, et al. Sodium alginate/poly(vinyl alcohol)/nano ZnO composite nanofibers for antibacterial wound dressings. Int J Biol Macromol. 2011;49(3):247-254.
42. Lee KY, Rowley JA, Eiselt P, et al. Controlling mechanical and swelling properties of alginate hydrogels independently by crosslinker type and cross-linking density. Macromolecules. 2000;33(11): 4291-4294.
43. Singh B, Sharma S, Dhiman A. Design of antibiotic containing hydrogel wound dressings: biomedical properties and histological study of wound healing. Int J Pharm. 2013;457(1):82-91.
44. P T SK, Lakshmanan VK, Raj M, et al. Evaluation of wound healing potential of ß-chitin hydrogel/nano zinc oxide composite bandage. Pharm Res. 2013;30(2):523-537.
45. Kumar PT, Lakshmanan VK, Anilkumar TV, et al. Flexible and microporous chitosan hydrogel/nano ZnO composite bandages for wound dressing: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012;4(5):2618-2629.
46. Raghupathi KR, Koodali RT, Manna AC. Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2011;27(7):4020-4028.
47. Sasidharan A, Chandran P, Menon D, Raman S, Nair S, Koyakutty M. Rapid dissolution of ZnO nanocrystals in acidic cancer microenvironment leading to preferential apoptosis. Nanoscale. 2011;3(9): 3657-3669.
48. Venkatesan J, Bhatnagar I, Kim SK. Chitosan-Alginate Biocomposite containing fucoidan for bone tissue engineering. Mar Drugs. 2014; 12(1):300-316.
49. Okamotoa Y, Yanoa R, Miyatakea K, Tomohirob I, Shigemasac Y, Minamia S. Effects of chitin and chitosan on blood coagulation. Carbohydr Polym. 2003;53(3):337-342.
50. Holmes AR, Cannon RD, Shepherd MG. Effect of calcium ion uptake on Candida albicans morphology. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1991;61(2-3): 187-193.
51. Sakai K, Koyama N, Fukuda T, et al. Search method for inhibitors of Staphyloxanthin production by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Biol Pharm Bull. 2012;35(1):48-53.
52. Raja A, Sivamani K, Garcia MS, Isseroff RR. Wound re-epithelialization: modulating keratinocyte migration in wound healing. Front Biosci. 2007;12:2849-2868.
53. Agren MS, Chvapil M, Franzén L. Enhancement of re-epithelialization with topical zinc oxide in porcine partial-thickness wounds. J Surg Res.1991;50(2):101-105.
54. 2+-sensing receptor, ZnR, to trigger signalling leading to epithelial repair. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285(34):26097-26106.