The cost of CO2 capture and storage

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 40, Issue , 2015, Pages 378-400

  Rubin, Edward S ^a   Davison, John E ^b   Herzog, Howard J ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b D Programme   (United Kingdom)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; Carbon sequestration; CCS costs; Economic analysis; Power plant costs

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; COAL COMBUSTION; COAL GASIFICATION PLANTS; COMBUSTION; COST ESTIMATING; COSTS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; FUEL STORAGE; GAS PLANTS; PRECOMBUSTION;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS; LEVELIZED COST OF ELECTRICITIES; NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLES; POST-COMBUSTION CO; POWER PLANT SYSTEM;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84947488663     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. M. Al-Juaied, and A. Whitmore Realistic Costs Of Carbon Capture, Belfer Center Discussion Paper 2009-08, Belfer Center For Science And International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School 2009 Harvard University Cambridge, MA
2. BLS, 2014. Consumer Price Index, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington DC, < www.bls.gov/cpi/tables.htm >.
3. BP, 2014. BP statistical review of world energy 2014. BP plc, London, UK.
4. P.C. Cabezón 14 MWth pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture pilot plant: main results and conclusions Gasification Technologies Conference 2011 9 12 Oct. 2012, www.gasifcation.org
5. Carbon Management Workshop, 2011. 9th Annual EOR Carbon Management Workshop, Houston, TX. Available at: < http://www.co2conference.net >.
6. CEM, 2014. Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index Chemical Engineering Magazine, December.
7. K. Damen, R. Faber, R. Gnutek, H.A.J. van Dijk, C. Trapp, and L. Valenz Performance and modelling of the pre-combustion capture pilot plant at the Buggenum IGCC Energy Procedia 63 2014 2014 6207 6214
8. de Mello, L.F., R. Gobbo, G.T., Moure, I. Miracca, 2012. Oxy-combustion technology development for fluid catalytic crackers (FCC) - large pilot scale demonstration, CO2Capture Project. Available at: < http://www.co2captureproject.org >.
9. 2 capture within refining: case studies. 3rd CCS cost workshop, Paris, France, 6th-7th November 2013. Global CCS Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
10. EPRI Engineering and economic evaluation of oxy-fired 1100 F (593 C) ultrasupercritical pulverized coal power plant with CO2 capture Report 1021782 2011 Electric Power Research Institute Palo Alto, CA August
11. EPRI, 2013. Program on technology innovation: integrated generation technology options 2012. Technical Update, February 2013. Report 1026656, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
12. EPRI, 2013. Update on Utilization or Storage of CO2 through Chemical, Biological, or Mineral Conversion. Report No. 3002001006, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
13. M. Finkenrath Cost and performance of carbon dioxide capture from power generation Working Paper 2011 International Energy Agency Paris
14. K. Gerdes, T. Stevens, J. Fout, and G. Fisher Current and future power generation technologies: pathways to reducing the cost of carbon capture for coal-fueled power plants Energy Procedia 63 2014 7541 7557
15. 2 geological storage site for the FutureGen Project in Morgan County Illinois, USA Energy Procedia Vol. 63 2014 6361 6367
16. GTC, 2015. World gasification database. Gasification Technologies Council. Accessed February 2015 Available at: < http://www.gasification.org/what-is-gasification/world-database >.
17. GCCSI, 2011. Economic assessment of carbon capture and storage technologies: 2011 update, Prepared by Worley Parsons and Schlumberger, Global CCS Institute, Canberra, Australia.
18. GCCSI, 2014. The global status of CCS, 2014. Global CCS Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
19. S. Gollakota, and S. McDonald Commercial-scale CCS Project in Decatur, Illinois - Construction status and operational plans for demonstration Energy Procedia vol 63 2014 5986 5993
20. Herzog, H., 2011. Audiences and uses for CCS cost estimates. Proceedings of the CCS Cost Workshop, 22-23 March 2011 (Paris, France), Global CCS Institute, Canberra, Australia.
21. 2 emissions from fuel combustion - highights, 2013 edition. International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
22. IEA, 2013. Technology roadmap, carbon capture and storage, 2013 edition. International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
23. IEA, 2014. Energy prices and taxes, quarterly statistics, fourth quarter 2014. International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
24. 2 capture in the cement industry, Report 2008/3, International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, UK.
25. 2 capture at gas fired power plants, Report 2012/8, International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas Programme, Cheltenham, UK.
26. IEAGHG, 2013. Iron and steel CCS study, Report 2013/4, International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, UK.
27. 2 capture at coal based power and hydrogen plants, Report 2014/3, International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas Programme, Cheltenham, UK.
28. IHS CERA, 2014. Power Capital Costs Index, IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Cambridge, MA.
29. IPCC, 2005. Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. In: Metz, B., Davidson, O., et al. (Eds.), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Geneva, Switzerland.
30. IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, In: Edenhofer, O., et al. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA.
31. Léandri, J-F. et al. (Alstom), 2011. Cost assessment of fossil power plants equipped with CCS under typical scenarios. Power-Gen Europe, 7-9 June 2011. Milan, Italy.
32. Merrow, E., Phillips, K., Myers, C., 1981. Understanding cost growth and performance shortfalls in pioneer process plants. RAND/R-2569-DOE, Rand. Corp., Santa Monica, CA.
33. MIT, 2007. The future of coal. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT, Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. MIT, 2015. Kemper County IGCC fact sheet: carbon dioxide capture and storage project. < https://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/kemper.html >.
35. Monea, M., 2014. Boundary Dam: the future is here. Presentation at GHGT-12, < http://www.ghgt.info/docs/GHGT-12/Presentations/iea-ghg-conference-no-video.pdf >.
36. D. Morgan, and T. Grant FE/NETL CO2 transport cost model: model overview, presentation DOE/NETL-2014/1668, US Dept of Energy 2014 National Energy Technology Laboratory Pittsburgh, PA
37. NCC, 2015. Fossil forward: revitalizing CCS bringing scale and speed to CCS deployment, National Coal Council, Washington, DC.
38. Oanda, 2014. Historical currency exchange rates. Available at: < http://www.oanda.com/currency/historical-rates >.
39. Raveendran, S.P., 2013. The Role of CCS as a mitigation technology and challenges to its commercialization, Master's Thesis, The MIT Energy Initiative, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, May.
40. Rochelle, G.T., 2014. From Lubbock, TX to Thompsons, TX: amine scrubbing for commercial CO2 capture from power plants, Proceedings of GHGT-12, Austin, TX. < http://www.ghgt.info/docs/GHGT-12/Presentations/rochelle-plenary-first-on-Wed.pdf >.
41. 2 capture, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 1, p. 188-197.
42. E.S. Rubin Understanding the pitfalls of CCS cost estimates Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 10 2012 181 190
43. E.S. Rubin, and H. Zhai The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 2012 3076 3084
44. E.S. Rubin, A. Mantripragada, P. Versteeg, and J. Kitchin The outlook for improved carbon capture technology Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 38 2012 630 671
45. 2 capture and storage cost estimates Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 17 2013 488 503
46. E.S. Rubin Seven Simple Steps To Improve Cost Estimates For Advanced Carbon Capture Technologies, Transformational Carbon Capture Technology Workshop (arlington, VA, September 23-25, 2014), U.S. Department Of Energy 2014 National Energy Technology Laboratory Pittsburgh, PA
47. Scottish Power, 2012. Scottish Power CCS Consortium FEED. Available at: < http://decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/emissions/ccs/ukccscomm-prog/feed/scottish-power/scottish-power.aspx >.
48. B. Suresh Ceh Marketing Research Report: Carbon Dioxide chemical economics handbook 2010 SRI Consulting
49. TTP, 2012. Final Front-End Engineering and Design Study Report, Tenaska Trailblazer Partners, Report to the Global CCS Institute, Canberra, Australia.
50. USDOE, 2010. Cost and performance for low-rank pulverized coal oxycombustion energy plants, Report No. DOE/NETL-401/093010, US Dept of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, September
51. USDOE, 2011. Cost estimation methodology for NETL assessments of power plant performance, US Dept of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA.
52. USDOE, 2011. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants: volume 3a: low-rank coal to electricity: IGCC cases, Report DOE/NETL-2011/1399. US Dept of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA.
53. USDOE, 2011. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants: vol. 3b: low-rank coal to electricity: combustion cases, Report DOE/NETL-2011/1463. US Dept of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA.
54. USDOE, 2011. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants: vol. 3c: natural gas combined cycle at elevation, Report DOE/NETL-2010/1396. US Dept of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA. March.
55. USDOE, 2013. Current and future technologies for natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants, Report DOE/NETL-341/061013, US Dept of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA. June.
56. USDOE, 2013. Proceedings of the 2013 NETL CO2Capture Technology Meeting, US Dept of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA.
57. USDOE, 2013. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants: vol. 1: bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity, Revision 2a, Report DOE/NETL-2011/1397. US Dept of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA.
58. 2 Transport Cost Model: Description and User's Manual, Report No. DOE/NETL-2014/1660. US Dept of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA.
59. 2 saline storage cost model: model description and baseline results, Report No. DOE/NETL-2014/1659, US Dept of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA.
60. USEIA, 2014. Monthly Energy Review July 2014. Report No. DOE/EIA-0035(2014/07), US Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, July.
61. 2 capture Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 35 2009 457 480
62. J. Wolff, and H. Herzog What lessons can hydraulic fracturing teach CCS about social acceptance Energy Procedia 63 2014 7024 7042
63. S. Yeh, and E.S. Rubin A review of uncertainties in technology experience curves Energy Econ. 34 2012 762 771
64. 2 capture: post-demonstration CCS in the EU, European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants, Brussels.
65. 2 transport: post-demonstration CCS in the EU, European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants, Brussels.
66. 2 storage: post-demonstration CCS in the EU, European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants, Brussels.