Improving Public Engagement With Climate Change: Five “Best Practice” Insights From Psychological Science

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 758-763

  van der Linden, Sander ^a   Maibach, Edward ^b   Leiserowitz, Anthony ^c  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

behavioral policy; climate change; public engagement

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; MOTIVATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC OPINION; RISK; SOCIAL NORM; UNITED STATES;

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES; CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; POLICY MAKING; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PUBLIC OPINION; RISK; SOCIAL NORMS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84947419869     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691615598516     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. K.AkerlofE.W.MaibachD.FitzgeraldA.Y.CedenoA.Neuman (2013). Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, does it matter?Global Environmental Change, 23, 81–91.
2. G.S.BernsD.LaibsonG.Loewenstein (2007). Intertemporal choice—Toward an integrative framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 482–488.
3. J.W.BolderdijkL.StegE.S.GellerP.K.LehmanT.Postmes (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3, 413–416.
4. S.ChaikenY.Trope (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford.
5. R.B.CialdiniC.A.KallgrenR.R.Reno (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 24, 201–234.
6. E.L.DeciR.KoestnerR.M.Ryan (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.
7. M.DeutschH.B.Gerard (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.
8. J.S.B.Evans (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
9. L.Festinger (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
10. R.Gifford (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66, 290–302.
11. R.GiffordL.ScannellC.KormosL.SmolovaA.BielS.BoncuD.Uzzell (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1–12.
12. V.GriskeviciusR.B.CialdiniN.J.Goldstein (2008). Social norms: An underestimated and underemployed lever for managing climate change. International Journal of Sustainability Communication, 3, 5–13.
13. P.HoweE.M.MarkowitzT.Ming-LeeC.-Y.KoA.Leiserowitz (2013). Global perceptions of local temperature change. Nature Climate Change, 3, 352–356.
14. M.J.HurlstoneS.LewandowskyB.R.NewellB.Sewell (2014). The effect of framing and normative messages in building support for climate policies. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e114335.
15. D.Kahneman (2012). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
16. D.KahnemanA.Tversky (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 263–291.
17. N.L.KerrC.M.Kaufman-Gilliland (1997). “.. and besides, I probably couldn’t have made a difference anyway”: Justification of social dilemma defection via perceived self-inefficacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 211–230.
18. J.E.LeDoux (1989). Cognitive-emotional interactions in the brain. Cognition & Emotion, 3, 267–289.
19. A.Leiserowitz (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous?Risk Analysis, 25, 1433–1442.
20. A.Leiserowitz (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery and values. Climatic Change, 77, 45–72.
21. S.LewandowskyG.E.GignacS.Vaughan (2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399–404.
22. G.F.LoewensteinE.U.WeberC.K.HseeE.Welch (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286.
23. S.M.MarxE.U.WeberB.S.OrloveA.LeiserowitzD.H.KrantzC.RoncoliJ.Philips (2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change, 17, 47–58.
24. D.T.Miller (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1053–1060.
25. T.MyersE.W.MaibachC.Roser-RenoufK.AkerlofA.Leiserowitz (2012). The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Climate Change, 3, 343–347.
26. J.M.NolanP.W.SchultzR.B.CialdiniN.J.GoldsteinV.Griskevicius (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923.
27. Pew Research Center. (2014). Thirteen years of the public’s top priorities. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/interactive/top-priorities/
28. O.Renn (2010). The social amplification / attenuation of risk framework: Application to climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 2, 154–169.
29. C.Roser-RenoufE.MaibachA.LeiserowitzX.Zhao (2014). The genesis of climate change activism: From key beliefs to political action. Climatic Change, 125, 163–178.
30. L.RudmanM.C.McLeanM.Bunzl (2013). When truth is personally inconvenient, attitudes change: The impact of extreme weather on implicit support for green politicians and explicit climate-change beliefs. Psychological Science, 24, 2290–2296.
31. L.ScannellR.Gifford (2013). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment & Behavior, 45, 60–85.
32. P.W.SchultzJ.M.NolanR.B.CialdiniN.J.GoldsteinV.Griskevicius (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434.
33. E.Shafir (2012). The behavioral foundations of public policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. S.A.Sloman (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.
35. P.SlovicE.Peters (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 322–325.
36. A.SpenceN.Pidgeon (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20, 656–667.
37. A.SpenceW.PoortingaC.ButlerN.F.Pidgeon (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 1, 46–49.
38. A.SpenceW.PoortingaN.F.Pidgeon (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957–972.
39. P.C.SternT.DietzT.AbelG.A.GuagnanoL.Kalof (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–98.
40. J.SwimS.ClaytonT.DohertyR.GiffordG.HowardJ.ReserE.Weber (2011). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the American Psychological Association’s task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41. Y.TropeN.Liberman (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.
42. A.TverskyE.Shafir (1992). The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science, 3, 305–309.
43. S.L.van der Linden (2014a). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 430–440.
44. S.L.van der Linden (2014b). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112–124.
45. S.van der Linden (2015). Intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 5, 612–613.
46. S.L.van der LindenA.A.LeiserowitzG.D.FeinbergE.W.Maibach (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0118489.
47. M.van VugtV.GriskeviciusP.Schultz (2014). Naturally green: Harnessing stone age psychological biases to foster environmental behavior. Social Issues and Policy Review, 8(1), 1–32.
48. T.R.TylerF.L.Cook (1984). The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 693–708.
49. E.U.Weber (2006). Evidence-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77, 103–120.
50. E.U.WeberP.C.Stern (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66, 315–328.
51. N.D.Weinstein (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.