A comparison of physical and mechanical properties of common tableting diluents

Excipient Development for Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, and Drug Delivery Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 127-153

  Carlson, Glenn T ^a   Hancock, Bruno C ^a  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947266474     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Shangraw RF, Demarest DA. A survey of current industrial practices in the formulation and manufacture of tablets and capsules. Pharma Technol 1993: 32-44.
2. Monograph for Calcium Phosphate, Dibasic Dihydrate from Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press, 2004.
3. Kibbe AH. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. Washington, D.C.; London, U.K.: American Pharmaceutical Association and Pharmaceutical Press, 2000.
4. Hiestand EN.Mechanics and physical principles for powders and compacts.West Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.: SSCI, Inc., 2003.
5. Brittain HG. What is the “correct” method to use for particle-size determination? Pharma Technol 2001: 96-98.
6. Hancock BC, Colvin JT, Mullarney MP, Zinchuk AV. The relative densities of pharmaceutical powders, blends, dry granulations and immediate-release tablets. Pharma Technol 2003: 64-80.
7. Hiestand EN, Smith DP. Indices of tableting performance. Powder Technol 1984; 38: 145-159.
8. Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. The compaction of pharmaceutical and other model materials-a pragmatic approach. Chem Eng Sci 1987; 42(4): 903-911.
9. Bateman SD, Rubinstein MH, Rowe RC, Roberts RJ, Drew P, Ho AYK. A comparative investigation of compression simulators. Int J Pharma 1989; 49: 209-212.
10. Tye CK, Sun C, Amidon GE. Evaluation of the effects of tableting speed on the relationship between compaction pressure, tablet tensile strength and tablet solid fraction. J Pharm Sci 2005; 94(3): 465-472.
11. Joiris E, Di Martino P, Bermeron C, Guyot-Hermann AM, Guyot JC. Compression behavior of orthorhombic paracetamol. Pharma Res 1998; 15: 1122-1130.
12. Doelker E. Comparative tabletting properties of sixteen microcrystalline celluloses. Drug Dev Ind Pharma 1987; 13: 1847-1875.
13. Edge S, Fraser Steele D, Chen A, Tobyn MJ, Staniforth JN. The mechanical properties of compacts of microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharma 2000; 200: 67-72.
14. Lamberson R, Raynor G. Tabletting properties of microcrystalline cellulose. Manufact Chem 1976; 47.
15. Reier G, Shangraw R. Microcrystalline cellulose in tableting. J Pharma Sci 1966; 55: 510.
16. Williams RO, Sriwongjanya M, Barron MK. Compaction properties of microcrystalline cellulose using tableting indices. Drug Dev Ind Pharma 1997; 23: 695-704.
17. Evdokimov IA, Serov AN. Effect of compaction parameters on mechanical strength of lactose tablets. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii Pishchev Tekhnol 2000; (5-6): 60-61.
18. Fell JT. The flow and compaction properties of lactose. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad 1976; 111(28): 681-685.
19. Fell JT. Influence of fines on the flow and compaction properties of lactose. J Pharma Pharmacol 1973; 25(suppl): 109P.
20. Fell JT, Newton JM. The tensile strength of lactose tablets. J Pharma Pharmacol 1968; 20: 657-658.
21. Kazumi D, Kazutoshi K, Kazutaka K, Kotaro I, Hisakazu S, Akinobu O. Effect of particle shape on the compaction and flow properties of powders. Chem Pharma Bull 1989; 37(11): 3070-3073.
22. Lerk CF. Consolidation and compaction of lactose.Drug Dev Ind Pharma 1993; 19(17-18): 2359-2398.
23. Masaki H, Akinobu O, Fukuji H. Effect of particle size of lactose on the compaction properties of powder and tensile strength of tablets. Yakuzaigaku 1986; 46(1): 50-57.
24. Riepma KA, Lerk CF, De Boer AH, Bolhuis GK, Kussendrager KD. Consolidation and compaction of powder mixtures. I. Binary mixtures of same particle size fractions of different types of crystalline lactose. Int J Pharma 1990; 66(1-3): 47-52.
25. Vromans H, Bolhuis GK, Lerk CF, Kussendrager KD, Bosch H. Studies on tableting properties of lactose. VI. Consolidation and compaction of spray-dried amorphous lactose. Acta Pharmaceutica Suecica 1986; 23(4): 231-240.
26. Whiteman M, Yarwood RJ. Variations in lactose NF from two different sources and their influence on tablet properties. Drug Dev Ind Pharma 1990; 16(11): 1815-1827.
27. Carstensen JT, Ertell C. Physical and chemical properties of calcium phosphates for solid state pharmaceutical formulations. Drug Dev Ind Pharma 1990; 16: 1121-1133.
28. Landin M, Rowe RC, York P. Particle size effects on the dehydration of dicalcium phosphate dihydrate powders. Int J Pharma 1994; 104: 271-275.
29. Landin M, Rowe RC, York P. Structural changes during the dehydration of calcium phosphate dihydrate. Eur J Pharma Sci 1994; 2: 245-252.
30. Schmidt PC, Herzog R. Calcium phosphates in pharmaceutical tableting. Pharma World Sci 1993; 15: 105-115.
31. Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. The compaction of pharmaceutical and other model materials-a pragmatic approach. Chem Eng Sci 1987; 42(4): 903-911.
32. Tomohiro Y, Forbes RT, Peter Y, Yoshiaki K. The improved compaction properties of mannitol after a moisture-induced polymorphic transition. Int J Pharma 2003; 258(1-2): 121-131.
33. Hancock BC, Carlson GT, Ladipo DD, Langdon BA, Mullarney MP. The powder flow and compact mechanical properties of two recently developed matrix-forming polymers. J Pharma Pharmacol 2001; 53: 1193-1199.
34. Mullarney MP, Hancock BC, Carlson GT, Ladipo DD, Langdon BA. The powder flow and compact mechanical properties of scrose and three highintensity sweeteners used in chewable tablets. Int J Pharma 2003; 257: 227-236
35. Hancock BC, Carlson GT, Ladipo DD, Langdon BA, Mullarney MP. Comparison of the mechanical properties of the crystalline and amorphous forms of a drug substance. Int J Pharma 2002; 241: 73-85
36. Davar N, Shah R, Pope DG, Ausburger LL. A critical comparison of Hiestand’s tabletting indices and traditional measures of compactibility to predict tabletting behavior. Pharma Res 1995; 12: S168.
37. Hiestand EN. Mechanics and Physical Principles for Powders and Compacts. West Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.: SSCI Inc., 2003.
38. Hiestandand E, Smith DP. Indices of tabletting performance. Powder Technol 1984; 38: 145-159.
39. Kuppuswamy R, Anderson SR, Hoag SW, Augsburger LL. Practical limitations of tableting indices. Pharma Dev Technol 2001; 6: 505-520.
40. Venkatesh GM, Coleman JAN, Wrzosek TJ, et al. Fractional factorial designs for optimizing experimental conditons for Hiestand’s indices of tabletting performance. Powder Technol 1998; 97: 151-159.
41. Williams RO, Sriwongjanya M, Barron MK. Compaction properties of microcrystalline cellulose using tableting indices. Drug Dev Ind Pharma 1997; 23: 695-704.
42. Wurster DE, Majuru S, Oh E. Prediction of the Hiestand bonding indices of binary powder mixtures from single-component bonding indices. Pharma Dev Technol 1999; 4: 65-70.
43. Hancock BC, Carlson GT, Ladipo DD, Langdon BA, Mullarney MP. The powder flow and compact mechanical properties of two recently developed matrix-forming polymers. J Pharma Pharmacol 2001; 53: 1193-1199.
44. Mullarney MP, Hancock BC, Carlson GT, Ladipo DD, Langdon BA. The powder flow and compact mechanical properties of sucrose and three high-intensity sweeteners used in chewable tablets. Int J Pharma. 2003; 257: 227-236.
45. Hancock BC, Carlson GT, Ladipo DD, Langdon BA, Mullarney MP. Comparison of the mechanical properties of the crystalline and amorphous forms of a drug substance. Int J Pharma. 2002;241: 73-85