Interfield comparison of academic output by using department level data

Scientometrics

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1653-1664

  Yuret, Tolga ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Interfield comparison; Publication evaluation; Rankings

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947130372     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1621-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Axarloglou, K., & Theoharakis, V. (2003). Diversity in economics: An analysis of Journal Quality Perceptions. Journal of the European Economic Association,1(6), 1402–1423.
2. Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. S. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interest? Scientometrics,69(1), 179–189.
3. Braun, T., Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch type index for journals. Scientometrics,69(1), 169–173.
4. Claro, J., & Costa, C. A. V. (2011). A made to measure indicator for cross-disciplinary bibliometric ranking of researchers performance. Scientometrics,86(1), 113–123.
5. Harzing, A., Alakangas, S., & Adams, D. (2014). hIa: an individual annual h-index to accomodate disciplinary and career length differences. Scientometrics,99(3), 811–821.
6. Hawkins, R. G., Ritter, L. S., & Walter, I. (1973). What economists think about their journals. Journal of Political Economy,81(4), 1017–1032.
7. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s research output. Proceeding of the National Academic of Sciences of the United States of America,102(46), 16569–16572.
8. Johnston, D. M., Piatti, M., & Torgler, B. (2013). Citation success over time: Theory or empirics? Scientometrics,95(3), 1023–1029.
9. Kalaitzidakis, P., Stengos, T., & Mamuneas, T. P. (2003). Ranking of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics. Journal of the European Economic Association,1(6), 1446–1466.
10. Liebowitz, S. J., & Palmer, J. P. (1984). Assessing the relative impacts of the economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature,22(1), 77–88.
11. Lopez-Illescas, C., Moya-Anegon, F., & Moed, H. F. (2011). A ranking of universities should account for differences in their disciplinary specilization. Scientometrics,88(2), 563–574.
12. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceeding of the National Academic of Sciences of teh United States of America,105(45), 17268–17272.
13. Ramirez, A. M., Garcia, A. O., & Del Rio, J. A. (2000). Renormalized impact factor. Scientometrics,47(1), 3–9.
14. Sombatsompop, N., & Markpin, T. (2005). Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,56(7), 676–683.
15. Yuret, T. (2014). Why do economists publish less? Applied Economics Letters,21(11), 760–762.