Editorial delay and its relation to subsequent citations: the journals Nature, Science and Cell

Scientometrics

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1867-1873

  Shen, Si ^a   Rousseau, Ronald ^b,c   Wang, Dongbo ^d   Zhu, Danhao ^a   Liu, Huoyu ^a   Liu, Ruilun ^d  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^d NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Editorial delay; High level multidisciplinary journals; Received citations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947128854     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1592-8     Document Type: Letter

References (13)

1. Amat, C. B. (2008). Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected food research journals. Influence of online posting. Scientometrics,74(3), 379–389.
2. Campanario, J. M. (1996). Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? Journal of the American Society for Information Science,47(4), 302–310.
3. Campanario, J. M., & Acedo, E. (2007). Rejecting highly cited papers: The views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,58(5), 734–743.
4. De Marchi, M. & Rocchi, M. (2001). The editorial policies of scientific journals: Testing an impact factor model. Scientometrics, 51(2), 395–404.
5. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2000). The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,51(2), 158–165.
6. Luwel, M., & van Wijk, E. (2012). Publication delays revisited: 1998–2012. In Archambault, Gingras, Larivière (Eds.) Proceedings of STI 2012 (pp. 569–577). Montréal: Science-Metrix.
7. Pautasso, M., & Schäfer, H. (2010). Peer review delay and selectivity in ecology journals. Scientometrics,84(2), 307–315.
8. Rousseau, R., García-Zorita, C., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2013). The h-bubble. Journal of Informetrics,7(2), 294–300.
9. Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (2012). Interactions between journal attributes and authors’ willingness to wait for editorial decisions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,63(6), 1213–1225.
10. Siler, K., Lee, K., & Bero, L. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA,112(2), 360–365.
11. Yegros-Yegros, A., & Amat, C. B. (2009). Editorial delay of food research papers is influenced by authors’ experience but not by country of origin of the manuscripts. Scientometrics,81(2), 367–380.
12. Yu, G., Yu, D. R., & Li, Y. J. (2005). A simulation study of the periodicals’ publication delay control process. Scientometrics,63(1), 25–38.
13. Yu, G., Yu, D. R., & Rong, Y. H. (2000). The mathematical models of the periodical literature publishing process. Information Processing and Management,36(3), 401–414.