Domestication selected for deceleration of the circadian clock in cultivated tomato

Nature Genetics

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 89-93

  Müller, Niels A ^a   Wijnen, Cris L ^a,f   Srinivasan, Arunkumar ^a   Ryngajllo, Malgorzata ^a   Ofner, Itai ^b   Lin, Tao ^a,c   Ranjan, Aashish ^d,g   West, Donnelly ^d   Maloof, Julin N ^d   Sinha, Neelima R ^d   Huang, Sanwen ^a,c   Zamir, Dani ^b   Jiménez Gómez, José M ^b,e  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PLANT BREEDING RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^f WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^g NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENOME RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; CHROMOSOME 9; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; CULTIVATED SPECIES; DOMESTICATION; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETIC VARIATION; GERMINATION; NONHUMAN; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PLANT BREEDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELECTIVE SWEEP; TOMATO; WILD SPECIES; CROP; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYLOGENY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ALLELES; CIRCADIAN CLOCKS; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHOTOPERIOD; PHYLOGENY; PLANT PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84947087027     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3447     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Hsu, P.Y., & Harmer, S.L. Wheels within wheels: the plant circadian system. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 240-249 (2014).
2. Michael, T.P., et al. Enhanced fitness conferred by naturally occurring variation in the circadian clock. Science 302, 1049-1053 (2003).
3. Pittendrigh, C.S., & Takamura, T. Latitudinal clines in the properties of a circadian pacemaker. J. Biol. Rhythms 4, 217-235 (1989).
4. Joshi, D.S. Latitudinal variation in locomotor activity rhythm in adult Drosophila ananassae. Can. J. Zool. 77, 865-870 (1999).
5. Edgar, R.S., et al. Peroxiredoxins are conserved markers of circadian rhythms. Nature 485, 459-464 (2012).
6. Nagel, D.H., & Kay, S.A. Complexity in the wiring and regulation of plant circadian networks. Curr. Biol. 22, R648-R657 (2012).
7. Beaver, L.M., et al. Loss of circadian clock function decreases reproductive fitness in males of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2134-2139 (2002).
8. Woelfle, M.A., Ouyang, Y., Phanvijhitsiri, K., & Johnson, C.H. The adaptive value of circadian clocks: an experimental assessment in cyanobacteria. Curr. Biol. 14, 1481-1486 (2004).
9. Green, R.M., Tingay, S., Wang, Z.Y., & Tobin, E.M. Circadian rhythms confer a higher level of fitness to Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol. 129, 576-584 (2002).
10. Dodd, A.N., et al. Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309, 630-633 (2005).
11. McClung, C.R. Wheels within wheels: new transcriptional feedback loops in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. F1000Prime Rep. 6, 2 (2014).
12. Turner, A., Beales, J., Faure, S., Dunford, R.P., & Laurie, D.A. The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science 310, 1031-1034 (2005).
13. Murphy, R.L., et al. Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37 (PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16469-16474 (2011).
14. Pin, P.A., et al. The role of a pseudo-response regulator gene in life cycle adaptation and domestication of beet. Curr. Biol. 22, 1095-1101 (2012).
15. Zakhrabekova, S., et al. Induced mutations in circadian clock regulator Mat-A facilitated short-season adaptation and range extension in cultivated barley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4326-4331 (2012).
16. Faure, S., et al. Mutation at the circadian clock gene EARLY MATURITY 8 adapts domesticated barley (Hordeum vulgare) to short growing seasons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8328-8333 (2012).
17. Weller, J.L., et al. A conserved molecular basis for photoperiod adaptation in two temperate legumes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21158-21163 (2012).
18. Gao, H., et al. Days to heading 7, a major quantitative locus determining photoperiod sensitivity and regional adaptation in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16337-16342 (2014).
19. Campoli, C., Shtaya, M., Davis, S.J., & von Korff, M. Expression conservation within the circadian clock of a monocot: natural variation at barley Ppd-H1 affects circadian expression of flowering time genes, but not clock orthologs. BMC Plant Biol. 12, 97 (2012).
20. Blanca, J., et al. Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PLoS ONE 7, e48198 (2012).
21. Filichkin, S.A., et al. Global profiling of rice and poplar transcriptomes highlights key conserved circadian-controlled pathways and cis-regulatory modules. PLoS ONE 6, e16907 (2011).
22. Kazmi, R.H., et al. Complex genetics controls natural variation among seed quality phenotypes in a recombinant inbred population of an interspecific cross between Solanum lycopersicum x Solanum pimpinellifolium. Plant Cell Environ. 35, 929-951 (2012).
23. Eshed, Y., & Zamir, D. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-Associated QTL. Genetics 141, 1147-1162 (1995).
24. Dieterle, M., Zhou, Y.C., Schafer, E., Funk, M., & Kretsch, T. EID1, an F-box protein involved in phytochrome A-specific light signaling. Genes Dev. 15, 939-944 (2001).
25. Somers, D.E., Devlin, P.F., & Kay, S.A. Phytochromes and cryptochromes in the entrainment of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 282, 1488-1490 (1998).
26. Aflitos, S., et al. Exploring genetic variation in the tomato (Solanum section Lycopersicon) clade by whole-genome sequencing. Plant J. 80, 136-148 (2014).
27. Lin, T., et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat. Genet. 46, 1220-1226 (2014).
28. Velez-Ramirez, A.I., van Ieperen, W., Vreugdenhil, D., & Millenaar, F.F. Plants under continuous light. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 310-318 (2011).
29. Velez-Ramirez, A.I., et al. A single locus confers tolerance to continuous light and allows substantial yield increase in tomato. Nat. Commun. 5, 4549 (2014).
30. Chitwood, D.H., et al. A quantitative genetic basis for leaf morphology in a set of precisely defined tomato introgression lines. Plant Cell 25, 2465-2481 (2013).
31. Monson-Miller, J., et al. Reference genome-independent assessment of mutation density using restriction enzyme-phased sequencing. BMC Genomics 13, 72 (2012).
32. Li, H., & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
33. Koboldt, D.C., et al. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 22, 568-576 (2012).
34. Salathia, N., Lynn, J.R., Millar, A.J., & King, G.J. Detection and resolution of genetic loci affecting circadian period in Brassica oleracea. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114, 683-692 (2007).
35. Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S., & Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671-675 (2012).
36. Plautz, J.D., et al. Quantitative analysis of Drosophila period gene transcription in living animals. J. Biol. Rhythms 12, 204-217 (1997).
37. Broman, K.W., & Sen, S. A guide to QTL mapping with R/qtl. (Springer, 2009).
38. Koenig, D., et al. Comparative transcriptomics reveals patterns of selection in domesticated and wild tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2655-E2662 (2013).
39. Bolger, A., et al. The genome of the stress-Tolerant wild tomato species Solanum pennellii. Nat. Genet. 46, 1034-1038 (2014).
40. Expósito-Rodríguez, M., Borges, A.A., Borges-Pérez, A., & Pérez, J.A. Selection of internal control genes for quantitative real-Time RT-PCR studies during tomato development process. BMC Plant Biol. 8, 131 (2008).
41. Kim, D., et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).
42. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011).
43. Lawrence, M., et al. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003118 (2013).
44. Morgan, M., Pagès, H., Obenchain, V., & Haydon, N. Rsamtools: Binary alignment (BAM), FASTA, variant call (BCF) and tabix file import. R package version 1.18.2.
45. Love, M.I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
46. Yang, R., & Su, Z. Analyzing circadian expression data by harmonic regression based on autoregressive spectral estimation. Bioinformatics 26, i168-i174 (2010).
47. Falcon, S., & Gentleman, R. Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association. Bioinformatics 23, 257-258 (2007).
48. Nakagawa, T., et al. Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 104, 34-41 (2007).
49. McCormick, S., et al. Leaf disc transformation of cultivated tomato (L. esculentum) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Rep. 5, 81-84 (1986).
50. Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
51. DePristo, M.A., et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491-498 (2011).
52. Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289-290 (2004).
53. Markwell, J., Osterman, J.C., & Mitchell, J.L. Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynth. Res. 46, 467-472 (1995).