-
1
-
-
0014730907
-
Estimates of Induced Abortion in Urban North Carolina
-
J.R.Abernathy,, B.G.Greenberg,, and D.G.Horvitz, (1970), “Estimates of Induced Abortion in Urban North Carolina,” Demography, 7, 19–29.
-
(1970)
Demography
, vol.7
, pp. 19-29
-
-
Abernathy, J.R.1
Greenberg, B.G.2
Horvitz, D.G.3
-
2
-
-
0013379607
-
A Multi-Proportions Randomized Response Model
-
A.L.A.Abul-Ela,, G.G.Greenberg,, and D.G.Horvitz, (1967), “A Multi-Proportions Randomized Response Model,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 990–1008.
-
(1967)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.62
, pp. 990-1008
-
-
Abul-Ela, A.L.A.1
Greenberg, G.G.2
Horvitz, D.G.3
-
5
-
-
84946942636
-
-
Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN)
-
G.Blair,, Y.-Y.Zhou,, and K.Imai, (2015b), “rr: Statistical Methods for the Randomized Response,” Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rr.
-
(2015)
rr: Statistical Methods for the Randomized Response
-
-
Blair, G.1
Zhou, Y.-Y.2
Imai, K.3
-
6
-
-
85044904382
-
Assuring Confidentiality of Responses in Social Research: A Note on Strategies
-
R.F.Boruch, (1971), “Assuring Confidentiality of Responses in Social Research: A Note on Strategies,” American Sociologist, 6, 308–311.
-
(1971)
American Sociologist
, vol.6
, pp. 308-311
-
-
Boruch, R.F.1
-
7
-
-
0005586413
-
Estimating Proportions From Randomized Response Data Using the em Algorithm
-
P.D.Bourke,, and M.A.Moran, (1988), “Estimating Proportions From Randomized Response Data Using the em Algorithm,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 964–968.
-
(1988)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.83
, pp. 964-968
-
-
Bourke, P.D.1
Moran, M.A.2
-
8
-
-
34248228405
-
Application of the Randomized Response Technique to Marine Park Management: An Assessment of Permit Compliance
-
M.Y.Chaloupka, (1985), “Application of the Randomized Response Technique to Marine Park Management: An Assessment of Permit Compliance,” Environmental Management, 9, 393–398.
-
(1985)
Environmental Management
, vol.9
, pp. 393-398
-
-
Chaloupka, M.Y.1
-
9
-
-
0043261504
-
Using Randomized Response From a Complex Survey to Estimate a Sensitive Proportion in a Dichotomous Finite Population
-
A.Chaudhuri, (2001), “Using Randomized Response From a Complex Survey to Estimate a Sensitive Proportion in a Dichotomous Finite Population,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 94, 37–42.
-
(2001)
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
, vol.94
, pp. 37-42
-
-
Chaudhuri, A.1
-
11
-
-
24144463960
-
Optional Versus Compulsory Randomized Response Techniques in Complex Surveys
-
A.Chaudhuri,, and A.Saha, (2005), “Optional Versus Compulsory Randomized Response Techniques in Complex Surveys,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 135, 516–527.
-
(2005)
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
, vol.135
, pp. 516-527
-
-
Chaudhuri, A.1
Saha, A.2
-
12
-
-
0042287179
-
The Randomized Response Technique as Used in the Taiwan Outcome of Pregnancy Study
-
I.-C.Chi,, L.Chow,, and R.V.Rider, (1972), “The Randomized Response Technique as Used in the Taiwan Outcome of Pregnancy Study,” Studies in Family Planning, 3, 265–269.
-
(1972)
Studies in Family Planning
, vol.3
, pp. 265-269
-
-
Chi, I.-C.1
Chow, L.2
Rider, R.V.3
-
13
-
-
24944546059
-
Randomized Response Technique for Two Sensitive Characteristics at the Same Time
-
T.C.Christofides, (2005), “Randomized Response Technique for Two Sensitive Characteristics at the Same Time,” Metrika, 62, 53–63.
-
(2005)
Metrika
, vol.62
, pp. 53-63
-
-
Christofides, T.C.1
-
14
-
-
0032377550
-
Honest Answers to Embarrassing Questions: Detecting Cheating in the Randomized Response Model
-
S.J.Clark,, and R.A.Desharnais, (1998), “Honest Answers to Embarrassing Questions: Detecting Cheating in the Randomized Response Model,” Psychological Methods, 3, 160–168.
-
(1998)
Psychological Methods
, vol.3
, pp. 160-168
-
-
Clark, S.J.1
Desharnais, R.A.2
-
15
-
-
78651384397
-
Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: Experimental Results for the Randomized Response Technique (RRT) and the Unmatched Count Technique (UCT)
-
E.Coutts,, and B.Jann, (2011), “Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: Experimental Results for the Randomized Response Technique (RRT) and the Unmatched Count Technique (UCT),” Sociological Methods & Research, 40, 169–193.
-
(2011)
Sociological Methods & Research
, vol.40
, pp. 169-193
-
-
Coutts, E.1
Jann, B.2
-
16
-
-
84855168493
-
Plagiarism in Student Papers: Prevalence Estimates Using Special Techniques for Sensitive Questions
-
E.Coutts,, B.Jann,, I.Krumpal,, and A.-F.Näher, (2011), “Plagiarism in Student Papers: Prevalence Estimates Using Special Techniques for Sensitive Questions,” Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik), 231, 749–760.
-
(2011)
Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik)
, vol.231
, pp. 749-760
-
-
Coutts, E.1
Jann, B.2
Krumpal, I.3
Näher, A.-F.4
-
17
-
-
35648938062
-
Log-Linear Randomized-Response Models Taking Self-Protective Response Behavior Into Account
-
M.J.Cruyff,, A.Hout,, P.G.van der Heijden,, and U.Böckenholt, (2007), “Log-Linear Randomized-Response Models Taking Self-Protective Response Behavior Into Account,” Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 266–282.
-
(2007)
Sociological Methods & Research
, vol.36
, pp. 266-282
-
-
Cruyff, M.J.1
Hout, A.2
van der Heijden, P.G.3
Böckenholt, U.4
-
18
-
-
76749143734
-
Reducing Social Desirability Bias Through Item Randomized Response: An Application to Measure Underreported Desires
-
M.G.De Jong,, R.Pieters,, and J.-P.Fox, (2010), “Reducing Social Desirability Bias Through Item Randomized Response: An Application to Measure Underreported Desires,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 14–27.
-
(2010)
Journal of Marketing Research
, vol.47
, pp. 14-27
-
-
De Jong, M.G.1
Pieters, R.2
Fox, J.-P.3
-
19
-
-
85006664967
-
Maximum Likelihood From Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm” (with discussion)
-
A.P.Dempster,, N.M.Laird,, and D.B.Rubin, (1977), “Maximum Likelihood From Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–37.
-
(1977)
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B
, vol.39
, pp. 1-37
-
-
Dempster, A.P.1
Laird, N.M.2
Rubin, D.B.3
-
20
-
-
0037251353
-
An Assessment of the Prevalence, Severity, and Verifiability of Entry-Level Applicant Faking Using the Randomized Response Technique
-
J.J.Donovan,, S.A.Dwight,, and G.M.Hurtz, (2003), “An Assessment of the Prevalence, Severity, and Verifiability of Entry-Level Applicant Faking Using the Randomized Response Technique,” Human Performance, 16, 81–106.
-
(2003)
Human Performance
, vol.16
, pp. 81-106
-
-
Donovan, J.J.1
Dwight, S.A.2
Hurtz, G.M.3
-
21
-
-
0002043852
-
On the Relative Efficiency of Randomized Response Models
-
T.A.Dowling,, and R.H.Shachtman, (1975), “On the Relative Efficiency of Randomized Response Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 84–87.
-
(1975)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.70
, pp. 84-87
-
-
Dowling, T.A.1
Shachtman, R.H.2
-
22
-
-
84925978428
-
Validity of Forced Responses in a Randomized Response Model
-
S.E.Edgell,, S.Himmelfarb,, and K.L.Duchan, (1982), “Validity of Forced Responses in a Randomized Response Model,” Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 89–100.
-
(1982)
Sociological Methods & Research
, vol.11
, pp. 89-100
-
-
Edgell, S.E.1
Himmelfarb, S.2
Duchan, K.L.3
-
23
-
-
0347229823
-
Scrambled Randomized Response Methods for Obtaining Sensitive Quantitative Data
-
B.H.Eichhorn,, and L.S.Hayre, (1983), “Scrambled Randomized Response Methods for Obtaining Sensitive Quantitative Data,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 7, 307–316.
-
(1983)
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
, vol.7
, pp. 307-316
-
-
Eichhorn, B.H.1
Hayre, L.S.2
-
24
-
-
3543023369
-
Explaining Regulatory Non-Compliance: A Survey Study of Rule Transgression for Two Dutch Instrumental Laws, Applying the Randomized Response Method
-
H.Elffers,, P.Van Der Heijden,, and M.Hezemans, (2003), “Explaining Regulatory Non-Compliance: A Survey Study of Rule Transgression for Two Dutch Instrumental Laws, Applying the Randomized Response Method,” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 409–439.
-
(2003)
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
, vol.19
, pp. 409-439
-
-
Elffers, H.1
Van Der Heijden, P.2
Hezemans, M.3
-
25
-
-
0002156017
-
Randomized Response Versus Direct Questioning: Two Data-Collection Methods for Sensitive Information
-
D.S.Fidler,, and R.E.Kleinknecht, (1977), “Randomized Response Versus Direct Questioning: Two Data-Collection Methods for Sensitive Information,” Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1045–1049.
-
(1977)
Psychological Bulletin
, vol.84
, pp. 1045-1049
-
-
Fidler, D.S.1
Kleinknecht, R.E.2
-
26
-
-
0010774304
-
Measuring Associations With Randomized Response
-
J.A.Fox,, and P.E.Tracy, (1984), “Measuring Associations With Randomized Response,” Social Science Research, 13, 188–197.
-
(1984)
Social Science Research
, vol.13
, pp. 188-197
-
-
Fox, J.A.1
Tracy, P.E.2
-
28
-
-
77957252217
-
Understanding Off-The-Books Politics: Conducting Inference on the Determinants of Sensitive Behavior With Randomized Response Surveys
-
D.W.Gingerich, (2010), “Understanding Off-The-Books Politics: Conducting Inference on the Determinants of Sensitive Behavior With Randomized Response Surveys,” Political Analysis, 18, 349–380.
-
(2010)
Political Analysis
, vol.18
, pp. 349-380
-
-
Gingerich, D.W.1
-
29
-
-
85006684254
-
-
D.W.Gingerich,, A.Corbacho,, V.Oliveros,, and M.Ruiz-Vega, (2014), “When to Protect? Using the Crosswise Model to Integrate Protected and Direct Responses in Surveys of Sensitive Behavior.
-
(2014)
When to Protect? Using the Crosswise Model to Integrate Protected and Direct Responses in Surveys of Sensitive Behavior
-
-
Gingerich, D.W.1
Corbacho, A.2
Oliveros, V.3
Ruiz-Vega, M.4
-
30
-
-
0000118948
-
The Randomized Response Technique: A Test on Drug Use
-
M.S.Goodstadt,, and V.Gruson, (1975), “The Randomized Response Technique: A Test on Drug Use,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 814–818.
-
(1975)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.70
, pp. 814-818
-
-
Goodstadt, M.S.1
Gruson, V.2
-
31
-
-
84947377749
-
The Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model: Theoretical Framework
-
B.G.Greenberg,, A.L.A.Abul-Ela,, and D.G.Horvitz, (1969), “The Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model: Theoretical Framework,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 520–539.
-
(1969)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.64
, pp. 520-539
-
-
Greenberg, B.G.1
Abul-Ela, A.L.A.2
Horvitz, D.G.3
-
32
-
-
0013304286
-
Application of the Randomized Response Technique in Obtaining Quantitative Data
-
B.G.Greenberg,, R.R.Kuebler Jr,, J.R.Abernathy,, and D.G.Horvitz, (1971), “Application of the Randomized Response Technique in Obtaining Quantitative Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 243–250.
-
(1971)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.66
, pp. 243-250
-
-
Greenberg, B.G.1
Kuebler Jr, R.R.2
Abernathy, J.R.3
Horvitz, D.G.4
-
34
-
-
42649145435
-
The Multi-Item Randomized Response Technique
-
S.Himmelfarb, (2008), “The Multi-Item Randomized Response Technique,” Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 495–514.
-
(2008)
Sociological Methods & Research
, vol.36
, pp. 495-514
-
-
Himmelfarb, S.1
-
35
-
-
84907960198
-
-
Technical Report, Department of Social Sciences, University of Bern
-
M.Höglinger,, B.Jann,, and A.Diekmann, (2014), “Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: An Experimental Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique and the Crosswise Model,” Technical Report, Department of Social Sciences, University of Bern.
-
(2014)
Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: An Experimental Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique and the Crosswise Model
-
-
Höglinger, M.1
Jann, B.2
Diekmann, A.3
-
36
-
-
77952997517
-
Measuring Voter Turnout by Using the Randomized Response Technique: Evidence Calling Into Question the Method’s Validity
-
A.L.Holbrook,, and J.A.Krosnik, (2010), “Measuring Voter Turnout by Using the Randomized Response Technique: Evidence Calling Into Question the Method’s Validity,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 328–343.
-
(2010)
Public Opinion Quarterly
, vol.74
, pp. 328-343
-
-
Holbrook, A.L.1
Krosnik, J.A.2
-
37
-
-
84929670486
-
Using the Predicted Responses From List Experiments as Explanatory Variables in Regression Models
-
23, 180–196
-
K.Imai,, B.Park,, and K.F.Greene, (2015), “Using the Predicted Responses From List Experiments as Explanatory Variables in Regression Models,” Political Analysis, 23, 180–196.
-
(2015)
Political Analysis
-
-
Imai, K.1
Park, B.2
Greene, K.F.3
-
39
-
-
84858255771
-
Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Crosswise Model: An Experimental Survey Measuring Plagiarism
-
B.Jann,, J.Jerke,, and I.Krumpal, (2011), “Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Crosswise Model: An Experimental Survey Measuring Plagiarism,” Public Opinion Quarterly, doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr036.
-
(2011)
Public Opinion Quarterly
-
-
Jann, B.1
Jerke, J.2
Krumpal, I.3
-
40
-
-
84925152144
-
Validating Sensitive Questions: A Comparison of Survey and Register Data
-
A.Kirchner, (2015), “Validating Sensitive Questions: A Comparison of Survey and Register Data,” Journal of Official Statistics, 31, 31–59.
-
(2015)
Journal of Official Statistics
, vol.31
, pp. 31-59
-
-
Kirchner, A.1
-
41
-
-
84907950457
-
Measuring and Explaining Tax Evasion: Improving Self-Reports Using the Crosswise Model
-
M.Korndörfer,, I.Krumpal,, and S.C.Schmukle, (2014), “Measuring and Explaining Tax Evasion: Improving Self-Reports Using the Crosswise Model,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 45, 18–32.
-
(2014)
Journal of Economic Psychology
, vol.45
, pp. 18-32
-
-
Korndörfer, M.1
Krumpal, I.2
Schmukle, S.C.3
-
42
-
-
84866539859
-
Estimating the Prevalence of Xenophobia and Anti-Semitism in Germany: A Comparison of Randomized Response and Direct Questioning
-
I.Krumpal, (2012), “Estimating the Prevalence of Xenophobia and Anti-Semitism in Germany: A Comparison of Randomized Response and Direct Questioning,” Social Science Research, 41, 1387–1403.
-
(2012)
Social Science Research
, vol.41
, pp. 1387-1403
-
-
Krumpal, I.1
-
43
-
-
0001744398
-
Asking Sensitive Questions Indirectly
-
A.Y.Kuk, (1990), “Asking Sensitive Questions Indirectly,” Biometrika, 77, 436–438.
-
(1990)
Biometrika
, vol.77
, pp. 436-438
-
-
Kuk, A.Y.1
-
44
-
-
38249012691
-
A Test for Detecting Untruthful Answering in Randomized Response Procedures
-
D.V.Lakshmi,, and D.Raghavarao, (1992), “A Test for Detecting Untruthful Answering in Randomized Response Procedures,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 31, 387–390.
-
(1992)
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
, vol.31
, pp. 387-390
-
-
Lakshmi, D.V.1
Raghavarao, D.2
-
45
-
-
0038342857
-
An Empirical Validation of the Randomized Response Technique
-
C.W.Lamb,, and D.E.Stem, (1978), “An Empirical Validation of the Randomized Response Technique,” Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 15, 616–621.
-
(1978)
Journal of Marketing Research (JMR)
, vol.15
, pp. 616-621
-
-
Lamb, C.W.1
Stem, D.E.2
-
46
-
-
33749831014
-
The Measure of Induced Abortion Levels in Mexico Using Random Response Technique
-
D.Lara,, S.G.García,, C.Ellertson,, C.Camlin,, and J.Suárez, (2006), “The Measure of Induced Abortion Levels in Mexico Using Random Response Technique,” Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 279–301.
-
(2006)
Sociological Methods & Research
, vol.35
, pp. 279-301
-
-
Lara, D.1
García, S.G.2
Ellertson, C.3
Camlin, C.4
Suárez, J.5
-
47
-
-
2442474084
-
Measuring Induced Abortion in Mexico: A Comparison of Four Methodologies
-
D.Lara,, J.Strickler,, C.D.Olavarrieta,, and C.Ellertson, (2004), “Measuring Induced Abortion in Mexico: A Comparison of Four Methodologies,” Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 529–558.
-
(2004)
Sociological Methods & Research
, vol.32
, pp. 529-558
-
-
Lara, D.1
Strickler, J.2
Olavarrieta, C.D.3
Ellertson, C.4
-
49
-
-
21244449991
-
How to Improve the Efficiency of Randomised Response Designs
-
G.J.Lensvelt-Mulders,, J.J.Hox,, and P.G.Van Der Heijden, (2005a), “How to Improve the Efficiency of Randomised Response Designs,” Quality and Quantity, 39, 253–265.
-
(2005)
Quality and Quantity
, vol.39
, pp. 253-265
-
-
Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.1
Hox, J.J.2
Van Der Heijden, P.G.3
-
50
-
-
13444291582
-
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research Thirty-Five Years of Validation
-
G.J.Lensvelt-Mulders,, J.J.Hox,, P.G.Van der Heijden,, and C.J.Maas, (2005b), “Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research Thirty-Five Years of Validation,” Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 319–348.
-
(2005)
Sociological Methods & Research
, vol.33
, pp. 319-348
-
-
Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.1
Hox, J.J.2
Van der Heijden, P.G.3
Maas, C.J.4
-
51
-
-
2442746842
-
An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response Distortion
-
W.Locander,, S.Sudman,, and N.Bradburn, (1976), “An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response Distortion,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 269–275.
-
(1976)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.71
, pp. 269-275
-
-
Locander, W.1
Sudman, S.2
Bradburn, N.3
-
52
-
-
0017154322
-
Purposive Concealment of Death in Household Surveys in Misamis Oriental Province
-
F.C.Madigan,, J.R.Abernathy,, A.N.Herrin,, and C.Tan, (1976), “Purposive Concealment of Death in Household Surveys in Misamis Oriental Province,” Population Studies, 30, 295–303.
-
(1976)
Population Studies
, vol.30
, pp. 295-303
-
-
Madigan, F.C.1
Abernathy, J.R.2
Herrin, A.N.3
Tan, C.4
-
53
-
-
0002214223
-
An Improved Randomized Response Strategy
-
N.S.Mangat, (1994), “An Improved Randomized Response Strategy,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 56, 93–95.
-
(1994)
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B
, vol.56
, pp. 93-95
-
-
Mangat, N.S.1
-
54
-
-
0002230460
-
An Alternative Randomized Response Procedure
-
N.S.Mangat,, and R.Singh, (1990), “An Alternative Randomized Response Procedure,” Biometrika, 77, 439–442.
-
(1990)
Biometrika
, vol.77
, pp. 439-442
-
-
Mangat, N.S.1
Singh, R.2
-
55
-
-
0000760604
-
Optimization of the Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model
-
J.Moors, (1971), “Optimization of the Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 627–629.
-
(1971)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.66
, pp. 627-629
-
-
Moors, J.1
-
56
-
-
84927564474
-
Bayes Linear Estimators for Randomized Response Models
-
A.O’Hagan, (1987), “Bayes Linear Estimators for Randomized Response Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 580–585.
-
(1987)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.82
, pp. 580-585
-
-
O’Hagan, A.1
-
57
-
-
0242606412
-
A Comparison of Three Randomized Response Models for Quantitative Data
-
K.Pollock,, and Y.Bek, (1976), “A Comparison of Three Randomized Response Models for Quantitative Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 884–886.
-
(1976)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.71
, pp. 884-886
-
-
Pollock, K.1
Bek, Y.2
-
58
-
-
0038695397
-
Block Total Response as an Alternative to the Randomized Response Method in Surveys
-
D.Raghavarao,, and W.T.Federer, (1979), “Block Total Response as an Alternative to the Randomized Response Method in Surveys,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 41, 40–45.
-
(1979)
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B
, vol.41
, pp. 40-45
-
-
Raghavarao, D.1
Federer, W.T.2
-
59
-
-
0013377224
-
The Collection of Sensitive Information Using a Two-Stage, Randomized Response Model
-
J.E.Reinmuth,, and M.D.Geurts, (1975), “The Collection of Sensitive Information Using a Two-Stage, Randomized Response Model,” Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 12, 402–407.
-
(1975)
Journal of Marketing Research (JMR)
, vol.12
, pp. 402-407
-
-
Reinmuth, J.E.1
Geurts, M.D.2
-
60
-
-
84939227939
-
-
American Journal of Political Science.
-
B.Rosenfeld,, K.Imai,, and J.Shapiro, (2015), “An Empirical Validation Study of Popular Survey Methodologies for Sensitive Questions,American Journal of Political Science. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12205.
-
(2015)
An Empirical Validation Study of Popular Survey Methodologies for Sensitive Questions
-
-
Rosenfeld, B.1
Imai, K.2
Shapiro, J.3
-
61
-
-
0001995223
-
Covariate Randomized Response Models
-
N.Scheers,, and C.M.Dayton, (1988), “Covariate Randomized Response Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 969–974.
-
(1988)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.83
, pp. 969-974
-
-
Scheers, N.1
Dayton, C.M.2
-
62
-
-
84863404658
-
Identifying Indicators of Illegal Behaviour: Carnivore Killing in Human-Managed Landscapes
-
F.A.John,, A.M.Keane,, G.Edwards-Jones,, L.Jones,, R.W.Yarnell,, and J.P.Jones, (2012), “Identifying Indicators of Illegal Behaviour: Carnivore Killing in Human-Managed Landscapes,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 804–812.
-
(2012)
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
, vol.279
, pp. 804-812
-
-
John, F.A.1
Keane, A.M.2
Edwards-Jones, G.3
Jones, L.4
Yarnell, R.W.5
Jones, J.P.6
-
63
-
-
84899946713
-
Prevalence of Use of Performance Enhancing Drugs by Fitness Centre Members
-
J.H.Stubbe,, A.M.Chorus,, L.E.Frank,, O.Hon,, and P.G.Heijden, (2014), “Prevalence of Use of Performance Enhancing Drugs by Fitness Centre Members,” Drug Testing and Analysis, 6, 434–438.
-
(2014)
Drug Testing and Analysis
, vol.6
, pp. 434-438
-
-
Stubbe, J.H.1
Chorus, A.M.2
Frank, L.E.3
Hon, O.4
Heijden, P.G.5
-
64
-
-
11144317669
-
Randomized Response Techniques for Multiple Sensitive Attributes
-
A.C.Tamhane, (1981), “Randomized Response Techniques for Multiple Sensitive Attributes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 916–923.
-
(1981)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.76
, pp. 916-923
-
-
Tamhane, A.C.1
-
65
-
-
63549110682
-
Sample Surveys With Sensitive Questions: A Nonrandomized Response Approach
-
M.T.Tan,, G.-L.Tian,, and M.-L.Tang, (2009), “Sample Surveys With Sensitive Questions: A Nonrandomized Response Approach,” The American Statistician, 63, 9–16.
-
(2009)
The American Statistician
, vol.63
, pp. 9-16
-
-
Tan, M.T.1
Tian, G.-L.2
Tang, M.-L.3
-
66
-
-
0019580099
-
Prevalence and Reporting of Induced Abortion in Turkey: Two Survey Techniques
-
S.Tezcan,, and A.R.Omran, (1981), “Prevalence and Reporting of Induced Abortion in Turkey: Two Survey Techniques,” Studies in Family Planning, 12, 262–271.
-
(1981)
Studies in Family Planning
, vol.12
, pp. 262-271
-
-
Tezcan, S.1
Omran, A.R.2
-
67
-
-
84925971938
-
The Validity of Randomized Response for Sensitive Measurements
-
P.E.Tracy,, and J.A.Fox, (1981), “The Validity of Randomized Response for Sensitive Measurements,” American Sociological Review, 46, 187–200.
-
(1981)
American Sociological Review
, vol.46
, pp. 187-200
-
-
Tracy, P.E.1
Fox, J.A.2
-
68
-
-
84970242150
-
A Critical Evaluation of the Randomized Response Method: Applications, Validation, and Research Agenda
-
U.Umesh,, and R.A.Peterson, (1991), “A Critical Evaluation of the Randomized Response Method: Applications, Validation, and Research Agenda,” Sociological Methods & Research, 20, 104–138.
-
(1991)
Sociological Methods & Research
, vol.20
, pp. 104-138
-
-
Umesh, U.1
Peterson, R.A.2
-
69
-
-
69949086927
-
Accounting for Non-Compliance in the Analysis of Randomized Response Data
-
A.Hout,, and I.Klugkist, (2009), “Accounting for Non-Compliance in the Analysis of Randomized Response Data,” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 51, 353–372.
-
(2009)
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
, vol.51
, pp. 353-372
-
-
Hout, A.1
Klugkist, I.2
-
70
-
-
34547140340
-
The Logistic Regression Model With Response Variables Subject to Randomized Response
-
A.Hout,, P.G.van der Heijden,, and R.Gilchrist, (2007), “The Logistic Regression Model With Response Variables Subject to Randomized Response,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51, 6060–6069.
-
(2007)
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
, vol.51
, pp. 6060-6069
-
-
Hout, A.1
van der Heijden, P.G.2
Gilchrist, R.3
-
72
-
-
0034341044
-
A Comparison of Randomized Response, Computer-Assisted Self-Interview, and Face-to-Face Direct Questioning Eliciting Sensitive Information in the Context of Welfare and Unemployment Benefit
-
P.G.van der Heijden,, G.van Gils,, J.Bouts,, and J.J.Hox, (2000), “A Comparison of Randomized Response, Computer-Assisted Self-Interview, and Face-to-Face Direct Questioning Eliciting Sensitive Information in the Context of Welfare and Unemployment Benefit,” Sociological Methods & Research, 28, 505–537.
-
(2000)
Sociological Methods & Research
, vol.28
, pp. 505-537
-
-
van der Heijden, P.G.1
van Gils, G.2
Bouts, J.3
Hox, J.J.4
-
73
-
-
0020449036
-
Randomized Response Technique for Estimating Alcohol Use and Noncompliance in Hypertensives
-
B.J.Volicer,, and L.Volicer, (1982), “Randomized Response Technique for Estimating Alcohol Use and Noncompliance in Hypertensives,” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 43, 739–750.
-
(1982)
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
, vol.43
, pp. 739-750
-
-
Volicer, B.J.1
Volicer, L.2
-
74
-
-
0013776710
-
Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
-
S.L.Warner, (1965), “Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 63–69.
-
(1965)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.60
, pp. 63-69
-
-
Warner, S.L.1
-
75
-
-
0031506450
-
Base Rate for Employee Theft: Convergence of Multiple Methods
-
J.C.Wimbush,, and D.R.Dalton, (1997), “Base Rate for Employee Theft: Convergence of Multiple Methods,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 756–763.
-
(1997)
Journal of Applied Psychology
, vol.82
, pp. 756-763
-
-
Wimbush, J.C.1
Dalton, D.R.2
-
76
-
-
0042445067
-
Warner’s Randomized Response Model: A Bayesian Approach
-
R.L.Winkler,, and L.A.Franklin, (1979), “Warner’s Randomized Response Model: A Bayesian Approach,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 207–214.
-
(1979)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.74
, pp. 207-214
-
-
Winkler, R.L.1
Franklin, L.A.2
-
77
-
-
84884544334
-
Asking Sensitive Questions: An Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique Versus Direct Questioning Using Individual Vatextlidation Data
-
F.Wolter,, and P.Preisendörfer, (2013), “Asking Sensitive Questions: An Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique Versus Direct Questioning Using Individual Vatextlidation Data,” Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 321–353.
-
(2013)
Sociological Methods & Research
, vol.42
, pp. 321-353
-
-
Wolter, F.1
Preisendörfer, P.2
-
78
-
-
41049093792
-
Two New Models for Survey Sampling With Sensitive Characteristic: Design and Analysis
-
J.-W.Yu,, G.-L.Tian,, and M.-L.Tang, (2008), “Two New Models for Survey Sampling With Sensitive Characteristic: Design and Analysis,” Metrika, 67, 251–263.
-
(2008)
Metrika
, vol.67
, pp. 251-263
-
-
Yu, J.-W.1
Tian, G.-L.2
Tang, M.-L.3
|