ADOPTION OF WEB-BASED TRANSACTIONAL BANKING: EFFICIENCY-CHOICE AND NEO-INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 143-152

  Tan, Sharon S L ^a   Fichman, Mark ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; POPULATION STATISTICS; WEBSITES;

FIRM SIZE; INNOVATION ADOPTION; INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE; INTERNET BASED; IT INNOVATION; POLICY MAKERS; SMALLER FIRMS; THEORETICAL MODELING; THEORY AND PRACTICE; WEB BASED;

EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84946919338     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Abrahamson, E., and Rosenkopf, L. “Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation,” Organization Science (8:3), 1997, pp. 289-309.
2. Aldrich, H., and Fiol, C. “Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation,” Academy of Management Review (19), 1994, pp. 645-670.
3. Amit, R., and Schoemaker, P. J. H. “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rents,” Strategic Management Journal (14:1), 1993, pp. 33-46.
4. Barney, J. B. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management (17), 1991, pp. 99-120.
5. Burt, R. “Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence,” American Journal of Sociology (92), 1987, pp. 1287-1335.
6. Cohen, W. M. “Empirical Studies of Inovative Activity,” in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1995, pp. 182-264.
7. Cohen, W., and Klepper, S. “Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation Wwithin Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 1996, pp. 232-243.
8. Coleman, J. S., Katz, E., and Menzel, H. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.
9. Cool, K. O., Diericks, I., and Szulanski, G. “Diffusion of Innovations Within Organizations: Electronic Switching in the Bell System, 1971-1982,” Organization Science (8:5), 1997, pp543-559.
10. Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. A Behavioral Theory of Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
11. Deephouse, D. L. “To Be Different, or to Be the Same? It’s a Question (And Theory) of Strategic Balance,” Strategic Management Journal (20), 1999, pp. 147-166.
12. DiMaggio, P. M., and Powell, W. W. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review (48), 1983, pp. 147-60.
13. Fichman, R. G. “The Diffusion and Assimilation of Information Technology Innovations,” in R. W. Zmud (ed), Framing the Domains of IT Management. Cleveland, OH: Pinnaflex, 2000.
14. Granovetter, M. “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology (78), 1973, pp. 1360-1380.
15. Greve, H. R. “Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment,” Administrative Science Quarterly (40), 1995, pp. 444-473.
16. Greve, H. R. “Managerial Cognition and the Mimetic Adoption of Market Positions: What You See Is What You Do,” Strategic Management Journal (19), 1998, pp. 967-988.
17. Greve, H. R., Strang, D., and Tuma, N. B. “Specification and Estimation of Heterogeneous Diffusion Models,” Sociological Methodology (25), 1995, pp. 377-420.
18. Hannan, T. H., and McDowell, J. M. “The Determinants of Technology Adoption: The Case of the Banking Firm,” RAND Journal of Economics (16), 1984, pp. 70-83.
19. Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L. “Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition,” Administrative Science Quarterly (27), 1982, pp. 548-570.
20. Mansfield, E. “Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation,” Econometrica (29), 1961, pp. 741-766.
21. March, J. G. “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity and the Engineering of Choice,” Bell Journal of Economics (9), 1978, pp. 587-608.
22. Marenzi, O., Hickman, M., and Dehler, L. “Is Internet Banking Profitable? A Study of Digital Insight’s Offering,” Celent Communications, October 2000.
23. Meyer, J. W., and Rowan, B. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,” American Journal of Sociology (83), 1977, pp. 340-363.
24. OTS. Memorandum for Chief Executive Officers. Washington, DC: Office of Thrift Supervision, U.S. Department of the Treasury, June 10, 1999 (available online at http://www.ots.treas.gov/docs/25109.pdf).
25. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press, 1995.
26. Rosner, M. M. “Economic Determinants of Organizational Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly (12), 1968, pp. 614-625.
27. Saloner, G., and Shepard, A. “Adoption of Technologies with Network Effects: An Empirical Examination of the Adoption of Automated Teller Machines,” RAND Journal of Economics (26:3), 1995, pp. 479-501.
28. Strang, D., and Meyer, J. W. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusions,” in W. R. Scott, J. W. Meyer, and Associates (eds.), Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994.
29. Strang, D., and Tuma, N. B. “Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion,” American Journal of Sociology (99:3), 1993, pp. 614-639.
30. Urban, G. L., Weinberg, B. D., and Hauser, J. R. “Premarket Forecasting of Really-New Products,” Journal of Marketing (60), 1996, pp. 47-60.
31. Zucker, L. G. “Institutional Theories of Organizations,” Annual Review of Sociology (13), 1987, pp. 443-464.