Effect of sand grain shape on root and shoot growth of wheat seedlings

Geoderma

Volumn 265, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-5

  Lipiec, J ^a   Siczek, A ^a   Sochan, A ^a   Bieganowski, A ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS   (Poland)

Author keywords

Physical properties; Root morphology; Rough sand; Rounded sand; Young wheat

Indexed keywords

FRICTION; GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT); GRAIN GROWTH; HYDRODYNAMICS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

FRICTIONAL RESISTANCE; INTERNAL FRICTIONAL RESISTANCES; ROOT MORPHOLOGY; SCREENING APPROACHES; SHAPE IRREGULARITY; SURFACE STRUCTURE PARAMETER; WATER PERMEABILITY; YOUNG WHEAT;

SAND;

GRAIN SIZE; GROWTH RATE; MORPHOLOGY; PHYSICAL PROPERTY; ROOT ARCHITECTURE; ROOT-SHOOT RATIO; SAND; SEEDLING; SILICA; WATER UPTAKE; WHEAT;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84946866800     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Al-Dousari A.M., Al-Hazza A. Physical properties of aeolian sediments within major dune corridor in Kuwait. Arab. J. Geosci. 2013, 6:519-527.
2. Anderson K., Croft H. Remote sensing of soil surface properties. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2009, 33:457-473.
3. Atkinson B.S., Sparkes D.L., Mooney S.J. Effect of seedbed cultivation and soil macrostructure on the establishment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Soil Tillage Res. 2009, 103:291-301.
4. Batey T. Soil Husbandry 1988, Soil and Land Use Consultants Ltd., Aberdeen.
5. Bengough A.G., Bransby M.F., Hans J., McKenna S.J., Roberts T.J., Valentine T.A. Root responses to soil physical conditions: growth dynamics from field to cell. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57:437-447.
6. Bengough A.G., McKenzie B.M., Hallett P.D., Valentine T.A. Root elongation, water stress, and mechanical impedance: a review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:59-68.
7. Białousz S., Marcinek J., Stuczyński T., Turski R. Soil survey, soil monitoring and soil database in Poland. Soil Resources in Europe, European Soil Bureau. Research Report No. 9 2005, 263-273. (Luxembourg). R.J.A. Jones, B. Houšková, P. Bullock, L. Montanarella (Eds.).
8. Blake G.R., Hartge K.H. Particle density. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 - Physical and Mineralogical Methods 1986, American Society of Agronomy, Madison WI. Second edition. A. Klute (Ed.).
9. Bronick C.J., Lal R. Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 2005, 124:3-22.
10. Cho G.-C., Dodds J., Santamarina J.C. Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: natural and crushed sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2006, 132:591-602.
11. Clark L.J., Gowing D.J., Lark R.M., Leeds-Harrison P.B., Miller A.J., Wells D.M., Whalley W.R., Whitmore A.P. Sensing the physical and nutritional status of the root environment in the field: a review of progress and opportunities. J. Agric. Sci. 2005, 143:347-358.
12. Cox E. A method of assigning numerical and percentage values to the degree of roundness of sand grains. J. Paleontol. 1927, 1:179-183.
13. Cruse R.M., Cassel D.K., Averette F.G. Effect of particle surface roughness on densification of coarse-textured soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1980, 44:692-697.
14. Darbha G.K., Fischer C., Luetzenkirchen J., Schäfer T. Site-specific retention of colloids at rough rock surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:9378-9387.
15. de Bono J.P., McDowell G.R. An insight into the yielding and normal compression of sand with irregularly-shaped particles using DEM. Powder Technol. 2015, 271:270-277.
16. Furieri B., Russeil S., Santos J.M., Harion J.L. Effects of non-erodible particles on aeolian erosion: wind-tunnel simulations of a sand oblong storage pile. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 79:672-680.
17. Goss M.J., Drew M.C. Effect of mechanical impedance on growth of seedlings. Agricultural Research Council Letcombe Laboratory Annual Report 1971 1972, 35-42.
18. Graf F., Frei M. Soil aggregate stability related to soil density, root length, and mycorrhiza using site-specific Alnus incana and Melanogaster variegates. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 57:314-323.
19. Horn R. Friction phenomena in soils. Encyclopedia of Agrophysics 2011, 316-318. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York. J. Gliński, J. Horabik, J. Lipiec (Eds.).
20. Horn R., Baumgartl T. Dynamic properties of soils. Soil Physics Companion 2002, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. A.W. Warrick (Ed.).
21. Iijima M., Higuchi T., Barlow P. Contribution of root cap mucilage and presence of an intact root cap in maize (Zea mays) to the reduction of soil mechanical impedance. Ann. Bot. 2004, 94:473-477.
22. Jankowski M., Przewoźna B., Bednarek R. Topographical inversion of sandy soils due to local conditions in Northern Poland. Geomorphology 2011, 135:277-283.
23. Kamphorst E.C., Jetten V., Guérif J., Pitkänen J., Iversen B.V., Douglas J.T., Paz A. Predicting depressional storage from soil surface roughness. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000, 64:1749-1758.
24. Kuriakose S.L., van Beek L.P.H. Plant root strength and slope stability. Encyclopedia of Agrophysics 2011, 622-627. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York. J. Gliński, J. Horabik, J. Lipiec (Eds.).
25. Lee J., Yun T.S., Lee D., Lee J. Assessment of Ko correlation to strength for granular materials. Soils Found. 2013, 53:584-595.
26. Lipiec J., Horn R., Pietrusiewicz J., Siczek A. Effects of soil compaction on root elongation and anatomy of different cereal plant species. Soil Tillage Res. 2012, 12:74-81.
27. Materechera S.A., Dexter A.R., Alston A.M. Penetration of very strong soils by seedling roots of different plant species. Plant Soil 1991, 135:31-41.
28. McKenzie B.M. Spatial and temporal variability in soil physical conditions for root growth: interactions between soil, water and root growth for sustainable agriculture. Agrociencia 2012, 16:208-213.
29. McKenzie B.M., Mullins C.E., Tisdall J.M., Bengough A.G. Root-soil friction: quantification provides evidence for measurable benefits for manipulation of root-tip traits. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36:1085-1092.
30. Mora C., Kwan A. Sphericity, shape factor, and convexity measurement of coarse aggregate for concrete using digital image processing. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30:351-358.
31. Moreno-Espindola I.P., Rivera-Becerril F., Ferrara-Guerrero M.D., De Leon-Gonzalez F. Role of root-hairs and hyphae in adhesion of sand particles. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39:2520-2526.
32. Morphologi G3 Serise User Manual Mano 410, Issue 1.1 2008, Malvern Instruments Ltd., (August).
33. Novák V., Lipiec J. Water extraction by roots under environmental stresses. Pollution and Water Resources, Columbia University Seminar Proceedings: Impact of Anthropogenic Activity and Climate Changes on the Environment of Central Europe and USA. Hungarian Academy of Sciences, XLI 2012, 165-180. J. Halasi-Kun, V. Štekauerová, L. Fodor, V. Nagy, R. Lo Pinto. - Pécs (Eds.).
34. Pagliai M., Vignozzi N. Image analysis and microscopic techniques to characterize soil pore system. Physical Methods in Agriculture-approach to Precision and Quality 2002, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. J. Blahovec, M. Kutilek (Eds.).
35. Peach G.H. Beach and dune guidance manual for providence Bay, Manitoulin Island 2005, 28. (Prepared by the Lake Huron Centre for Coastal Conservation in partnership with the Lake Huron Pitcher's Thistle-Dune Grasslands Recovery Team).
36. Polakowski C., Sochan A., Bieganowski A., Ryzak M., Földényi R., Tóth J. The influence of the sand particle shape on particle size distribution measured by laser diffraction method. Int. Agrophys. 2014, 28:195-200.
37. Riley C., Rose W., Bluth G. Quantitative shape measurements of distal volcanic ash. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108:1-15.
38. Sakrabani R., Deeks L.K., Kibblewhite M.G., Ritz K. Impacts of agriculture upon soil quality. Environmental Impacts of Modern Agriculture 2012, 42-43. Elsevier, Cambridge. R.M. Harrison, R.E. Hester, J. Morris (Eds.).
39. Senger E., Mohiley A., Franzaring J., Montes J.M. Laboratory screening of aluminum tolerance in Jatropha curcas L. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 59:248-251.
40. Sezer A. Prediction of shear development in clean sands by use of particle shape information and artificial neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:5603-5613.
41. Thorsen M.K., Hopkins D.W., Woodward S., McKenzie B.M. Resilience of microorganisms and aggregation of a sandy calcareous soil to amendment with organic and synthetic fertilizer. Soil Use Manag. 2010, 26:149-157.
42. Tisdall J.M. Crop establishment - a serious limitation to high productivity. Guest editorial. Soil Tillage Res. 1996, 40:1-2.
43. Tisdall J.M., Nelson S.E., Wilkinson K., Smith S.E., McKenzie B.M. Stabilisation of soil against wind erosion by six saprotrophic fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 50:134-141.
44. Turpin C., Badr T., Harion J.L. Numerical modelling of aeolian erosion over rough surfaces. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2010, 35:1418-1429.
45. Turski M., Witkowska-Walczak B. Physical properties of Luvisols derived from silts of different genesis. Acta Agrophys. 2004, 101:5-55. (in Polish with English summary).
46. Vollsnes A.V., Futsaether C.M., Bengough A.G. Quantifying rhizosphere particle movement around mutant maize roots using time-lapse imaging and particle image velocimetry. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2010, 61:926-939.
47. Whalley W.R., Lipiec J., Stepniewski W., Tardieu F. Control and measurement of the physical environment in root growth experiments. Root Methods A Handbook 2000, 76-112. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. A.L. Smit, A.G. Bengough, C. Engels, M. van Noordwijk, S. Pellerin, S.C. van de Geijn (Eds.).
48. Woronko B., Pochocka-Szwarc K. Depositional environment of a fan delta in a Vistulian proglacial lake (Skaliska Basin, north-eastern Poland). Acta Palaeobot. 2013, 53:9-21.
49. Young L.M., Montagu K., Conroy J., Bengough A.G. Mechanical impedance of root growth directly reduces leaf elongation rates of cereals. New Phytol. 1997, 135:613-619.