Quantifying rhizosphere particle movement around mutant maize roots using time-lapse imaging and particle image velocimetry

European Journal of Soil Science

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 926-939

  Vollsnes, A V ^a   Futsaether, C M ^a   Bengough, A G ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; HARD SOIL; IMAGING METHOD; MAIZE; MUCILAGE; MUTATION; PARTICLE MOTION; PENETRATION; RHIZOSPHERE; ROOT SYSTEM; SAND;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 78649611026     PISSN: 13510754     EISSN: 13652389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01297.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abeysekera, R.M. & McCully, M.E. 1993. The epidermal surface of the maize root tip. II Abnormalities in a mutant which grows crookedly through soil. New Phytologist, 125, 801-811.
2. Adrian, R.J. 1991. Particle imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 23, 261-304.
3. Barnett, C.M., Bengough, A.G. & McKenzie, B.M. 2009. Quantitative image analysis of earthworm-mediated soil displacement. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 45, 821-828.
4. Bengough, A.G. & Mullins, C.E. 1990. Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. Journal of Soil Science, 41, 341-358.
5. Bengough, A.G., Croser, C. & Pritchard, J. 1997. A biophysical analysis of root growth under mechanical stress. Plant & Soil, 189, 155-164.
6. Bengough, A.G., Hans, J., Bransby, M.F. & Valentine, T.A. 2010. PIV as a method for quantifying root cell growth and particle displacement in confocal images. Microscopy Research & Technique, 73, 27-36.
7. Blancaflor, E.B. & Masson, P.H. 2003. Plant gravitropism. Unraveling the ups and downs of a complex process. Plant Physiology, 133, 1677-1690.
8. Bruand, A., Cousin, I., Nicoullaud, B., Duval, O. & Begon, J.C. 1996. Backscattered electron scanning images of soil porosity for analyzing soil compaction around roots. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60, 895-901.
9. Carminati, A., Moradi, A.B., Vetterlein, D., Vontobel, P., Lehmann, E., Weller, U. et al. 2010. Dynamics of soil water content in the rhizosphere. Plant & Soil, 332, 163-176.
10. Clark, L.J., Whalley, W.R. & Barraclough, P.B. 2003. How do roots penetrate strong soil? Plant & Soil, 255, 93-104.
11. Croser, C., Bengough, A.G. & Pritchard, J. 1999. The effects of mechanical impedance on root growth in pea (Pisum sativum). I. Rates of cell flux, mitosis, and strain during recovery. Physiologia Plantarum, 107, 277-286.
12. Dexter, A.R. 1987. Compression of soil around roots. Plant & Soil, 97, 401-406.
13. Dexter, A.R. & Tanner, D.W. 1972. Soil deformations induced by a moving cutting blade, an expanding tube and a penetrating sphere. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 17, 371-375.
14. Farrell, D.A. & Greacen, E.L. 1966. Resistance to penetration of fine probes in compressible soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 4, 1-17.
15. Faure, A.G. 1994. Stress field developed by root growth: theoretical approach. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 58, 53-67.
16. Fisher, J.E. 1964. Evidence of circumnutational growth movements in rhizomes of Poa pratensis L. that aid in soil penetration. Canadian Journal of Botany, 42, 293-299.
17. Greacen, E.L., Farrell, D.A. & Cockroft, B. 1968. Soil resistance to metal probes and plant roots. Transactions of the 9th Congress of the International Society of Soil Science, 1, 769-779.
18. Hamza, O., Bengough, A.G., Bransby, M.F., Davies, M.C.R. & Hallett, P.D. 2006. Biomechanics of plant roots: estimating localised deformation with particle image velocimetry. Biosystems Engineering, 94, 119-132.
19. Head, G.C. 1965. Studies of diurnal changes in cherry root growth and nutational movements of apple root tips by time-lapse cinematography. Annals of Botany, 29, 219-224.
20. Hinsinger, P., Bengough, A.G., Vetterlein, D. & Young, I.M. 2009. Rhizosphere: biophysics, biogeochemistry and ecological relevance. Plant & Soil, 321, 117-152.
21. Iijima, M., Barlow, P.W. & Bengough, A.G. 2003a. Root cap structure and cell production rates of maize (Zea mays) roots in compacted sand. New Phytologist, 160, 127-134.
22. Iijima, M., Higuchi, T., Barlow, P.W. & Bengough, A.G. 2003b. Root cap removal increases root penetration resistance in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 2105-2109.
23. Iijima, M., Higuchi, T. & Barlow, P. 2004. Contribution of root cap mucilage and presence of an intact root cap in maize (Zea mays) to the reduction of soil mechanical impedance. Annals of Botany, 94, 473-477.
24. Inoue, N., Arase, T., Hagiwara, M., Manao, T., Hyashi, T. & Ikeda, R. 1999. Ecological significance of root tip rotation for seedling establishment of Oryza sativa L. Ecological Research, 14, 31-38.
25. Lawrence, C.J., Seigfried, T.E. & Brendel, V. 2005. The maize genetics and genomics database. The community resource for access to diverse maize data. Plant Physiology, 138, 55-58.
26. Kirby, J.M. & Bengough, A.G. 2002. Influence of soil strength on root growth: experiments and analysis using a critical-state-model. European Journal of Soil Science, 53, 119-128.
27. Migliaccio, F. & Piconese, S. 2001. Spiralizations and tropisms in Arabidopsis roots. Trends in Plant Science, 6, 561-565.
28. Miller, I. & Moore, R. 1990. Defective secretion of mucilages is the cellular basis for agravitropism in primary roots of Zea mays cv. Ageotropic. Annals of Botany, 66, 169-178.
29. Moore, R. & Miller, I. 1993. Cellular differentiation in root caps of Zea mays that do not secrete mucilage. Plant, Cell & Environment, 16, 1003-1009.
30. Moradi, A.B., Conesa, H.M., Robinson, B., Lehmann, E., Kuehne, G., Kaestner, A. et al. 2009. Neutron radiography as a tool for revealing root development in soil: capabilities and limitations. Plant & Soil, 318, 243-255.
31. Mullen, J.L., Wolverton, C., Ishikawa, H., Hangarter, R.P. & Evans, M.L. 2002. Spatial separation of light perception and growth response in maize root phototropism. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25, 1191-1196.
32. Ni, Q., Hird, C.C. & Guymer, I. 2010. Physical modelling of pile penetration in clay using transparent soil and particle image velocimetry. Geotechnique, 60, 121-132.
33. Pudasaini, S.P. & Hutter, K. 2007. Avalanche Dynamics: Dynamics of Rapid Flows of Dense Granular Avalanches. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
34. Schrader, S., Rogasik, H., Onasch, I. & Jegou, D. 2007. Assessment of soil structural differentiation around earthworm burrows by means of X-ray computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy. Geoderma, 137, 378-387.
35. Shabala, S.N. & Newman, I.A. 1997. Proton and calcium flux oscillations in the elongation region correlate with root nutation. Physiologia Plantarum, 100, 917-926.
36. Thompson, M.V. & Holbrook, M.N. 2004. Root-gel interactions and the root waving behavior of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 135, 1822-1837.
37. Vennemann, P., Kiger, K.T., Lindken, R., Groenendijk, B.C.W., Stekelenburg-de Vos, S., Ten Hagen, T.L.M. et al. 2006. In vivo micro particle image velocimetry measurements of blood-plasma in the embryonic avian heart. Journal of Biomechanics, 39, 1191-1200.
38. Werth, C.J., Zhang, C.Y., Brusseau, M.L., Oostrom, M. & Baumann, T. 2010. A review of non-invasive imaging methods and applications in contaminant hydrogeology research. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 113, 1-24.
39. White, D.J. & Take, W.A. 2002. GeoPIV: Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) software for use in geotechnical testing Cambridge University Engineering Department Technical Report CUED/D-SOILS/TR322 (October 2002).
40. White, D.J., Take, W.A. & Bolton, M.D. 2003. Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry. Géotechnique, 53, 619-631.
41. Young, I.M. 1998. Biophysical interactions at the root-soil interface: a review. Journal of Agricultural Science, 130, 1-7.