Construct validity of the ecological momentary assessment in audiology research

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 872-884

  Wu, Yu Hsiang ^a   Stangl, Elizabeth ^a   Zhang, Xuyang ^a   Bentler, Ruth A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological momentary assessment; Hearing aid; Outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AUDIOLOGY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSATION; ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NOISE MEASUREMENT; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOUND LEVEL METER; SPEECH AND LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPREHENSION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPREHENSION; ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 84946847143     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: 21573107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15034     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Banerjee S. (2011) Hearing aids in the real world: typical automatic behavior of expansion, directionality, and noise management. J Am Acad Audiol 22(1):34-48.
2. Bentler R, Wu YH, Kettel J, Hurtig R. (2008) Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies. Int J Audiol 47(8):447-460.
3. Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK. (1987) Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science 236(4798):157-161.
4. Cienkowski KM, Speaks C. (2000) Subjective vs. objective intelligibility of sentences in listeners with hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 43(5):1205-1210.
5. Cord MT, Walden BE, Surr RK, Dittberner AB. (2007) Field evaluation of an asymmetric directional microphone fitting. J Am Acad Audiol 18(3):245-256.
6. Cox RM. (2003) Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client's point of view. Int J Audiol 42(1, Suppl): i S90-S96.
7. Cox RM, Alexander GC. (1995) The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 16(2):176-186.
8. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gilmore C. (1987) Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST). Ear Hear 8(5, Suppl):119S-126S.
9. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Rivera IM. (1991) Comparison of objective and subjective measures of speech intelligibility in elderly hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Hear Res 34(4):904-915.
10. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. (1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 52(4):281-302.
11. Galvez G, Turbin MB, Thielman EJ, Istvan JA, Andrews JA, Henry JA. (2012) Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment of hearing difficulties encountered by hearing aid users. Ear Hear 33(4):497-507.
12. Gatehouse S, Naylor G, Elberling C. (2006) Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings-2. Patterns of candidature. Int J Audiol 45(3):153-171.
13. Hasan SS, Chipara O, Wu YH, Aksan N. (2014) Evaluating auditory contexts and their impacts on hearing aid outcomes with mobile phones. Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 126-133.
14. Hasan SS, Lai F, Chipara O, Wu YH. (2013) AudioSense: enabling real-time evaluation of hearing aid technology in-situ. International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 143-148.
15. Hektner JM, Schmidt JA, Csikszentmihalyi M. (2007) Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Henry JA, Galvez G, Turbin MB, Thielman EJ, McMillan GP, Istvan JA. (2012) Pilot study to evaluate ecological momentary assessment of tinnitus. Ear Hear 33(2):179-290.
17. Humes LE. (2002) Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. JAcoust SocAm 112(3 pt 1):1112-1132.
18. Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA. (2004) A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 306(5702):1776-1780.
19. Lee L, Lau C, Sullivan D. (1998) The advantage of a low compression threshold in directional microphones. Hear Rev 5:30-32.
20. Lunner T. (2003) Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol 42(1, Suppl):S49-S58.
21. Palmer C, Bentler R, Mueller HG. (2006) Evaluation of a secondorder directional microphone hearing aid: II. Self-report outcomes. J Am Acad Audiol 17(3):190-201.
22. Pearsons KS, Bennett RL, Fidell S. (1976) Speech Levels in Various Environments. Report to the Office of Resources and Development. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman.
23. Preminger JE, Cunningham DR. (2003) Case-study analysis of various field study measures. J Am Acad Audiol 14(1):39-55.
24. Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D. (2003) Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids. Ear Hear 24(5):424-439.
25. Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW. (2003) Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit. Ear Hear 24(6):472-484.
26. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. (2008) Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 4:1-32.
27. Studebaker GA. (1985) A "rationalized" arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res 28(3):455-462.
28. Sumby WH, Pollack I. (1954) Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 26:212-215.
29. Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT, Dyrlund O. (2004) Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening. J Am Acad Audiol 15(5):365-396.
30. Walden BE, Surr RK, Grant KW, Van Summers W, Cord MT, Dyrlund O. (2005) Effect of signal-to-noise ratio on directional microphone benefit and preference. J Am Acad Audiol 16(9):662-676.
31. Wu YH, Bentler RA. (2010a) Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: part I-laboratory tests. Ear Hear 31(1):22-34.
32. Wu YH, Bentler RA. (2010b) Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: part II-field tests. Ear Hear 31(1):35-46.
33. Wu YH, Bentler RA. (2012) Do older adults have social lifestyles that place fewer demands on hearing? J Am Acad Audiol 23(9):697-711.
34. Wu YH, Stangl E. (2013) The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction. Ear Hear 34(3):333-341.
35. Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA. (2013) Hearing-aid users' voices: a factor that could affect directional benefit. Int J Audiol 52(11):789-794.