Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment of hearing difficulties encountered by hearing aid users

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 497-507

  Galvez, Gino ^a   Turbin, Mitchel B ^a   Thielman, Emily J ^a   Istvan, Joseph A ^a   Andrews, Judy A ^b   Henry, James A ^a,c  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR REHABILITATIVE AUDITORY RESEARCH   (United States)

^b OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MICROCOMPUTER; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84862853580     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182498c41     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Beal, D. J., & Weiss, H. M. (2003). Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organ Res Meth, 6, 440-464.
2. Bentler, R. A. (2005). Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: A systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 473-484.
3. Boothroyd, A. (2007). Adult aural rehabilitation: What is it and does it work? Trends Amplif, 11, 63-71.
4. Brown, K. W., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1997). Does unhappiness make you sick? The role of affect and neuroticism in the experience of common physical symptoms. J Pers Soc Psychol, 72, 907-917.
5. Chisolm, T. H., Abrams, H. B., McArdle, R. (2004). Short-and long-term outcomes of adult audiological rehabilitation. Ear Hear, 25, 464-477.
6. Compton-Conley, C. L., Neuman, A. C., Killion, M. C., et al. (2004). Performance of directional microphones for hearing aids: Real-world versus simulation. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 440-455.
7. Cox, R. M. (2005). Evidence-based practice in provision of amplification. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 419-438.
8. Cruise, C. E., Broderick, J., Porter, L., et al. (1996). Reactive effects of diary self-assessment in chronic pain patients. Pain, 67, 253-258.
9. Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Trull, T. J. (2009). Ecological momentary assessment of mood disorders and mood dysregulation. Psychol Assess, 21, 463-475.
10. Gagné, J. P. (2000). What is treatment evaluation research? What is its relationship to the goals of audiological rehabilitation? Who are the stakeholders of this type of research? Ear Hear, 21(suppl 4), 60S-73.S.
11. Gatehouse, S. (1994). Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear, 15, 30-49.
12. Gatehouse, S. (1999). Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 80-103.
13. Henry, J. A., Galvez, G., Turbin, M. B., et al. (2012). Pilot study to evaluate ecological momentary assessment of tinnitus. Ear Hear, 33, 279-290.
14. Humes, L., & Humes, L. (2004). Factors affecting long-term hearing aid success. Sem Hear, 25, 63-72.
15. Kahneman, D., Fredericson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychol Sci, 4, 401-405.
16. Knudsen, L. V., Oberg, M., Nielsen, C., et al. (2010). Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: A review of the literature. Trends Amplif, 14, 127-154.
17. Kochkin, S. (2009). MarkeTrak VIII: 25-year trends in the hearing health market. Hear Rev, 62, 12-31.
18. Kochkin, S. (2010). MarkeTrak VIII: Consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing. Hear J, 63, 19-32.
19. Kricos, P. B. (2000). The influence of nonaudiological variables on audiological rehabilitation outcomes. Ear Hear, 21(suppl 4), 7S-14.S.
20. Krueger, R. A. (1998). Analyzing and Reporting Focus Group Results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Kuk, F. K., Potts, L., Valente, M., et al. (2003). Evidence of acclimatization in persons with severe-to-profound hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 84-99.
22. Morren, M., van Dulmen, S., Ouwerkerk, J., et al. (2009). Compliance with momentary pain measurement using electronic diaries: A systematic review. Eur J Pain, 13, 354-365.
23. Noble, W. (2000). Self-reports about tinnitus and about cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 21(suppl 4), 50S-59.S.
24. Noble, W. (2002). Extending the IOI to significant others and to non-hearing-aid-based interventions. Int J Audiol, 41, 27-29.
25. Piasecki, T. M., Hufford, M. R., Solhan, M., et al. (2007). Assessing clients in their natural environments with electronic diaries: Rationale, benefits, limitations, and barriers. Psychol Assess, 19, 25-43.
26. Powell, R. A., Single, H. M., Lloyd, K. R. (1996). Focus groups in mental health research: Enhancing the validity of user and provider questionnaires. Int J Soc Psychiatry, 42, 193-206.
27. Prendergast, S. G., & Kelley, L. A. (2002). Aural rehab services: Survey reports who offers which ones and how often, and by whom. Hear J, 55, 30-35.
28. Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychol Bull, 128, 934-960.
29. Saunders, G. H., Chisolm, T. H., Abrams, H. B. (2005). Measuring hearing aid outcomes-Not as easy as it seems. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42(4 suppl 2), 157-168.
30. Schwartz, J. E., & Stone, A. A. (1998). Strategies for analyzing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychol, 17, 6-16.
31. Scollon, C. N., Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. J Happiness Stud, 4, 5-34.
32. Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 4, 1-32.
33. Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Schwartz, J. E., et al. (2003). Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: Reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain, 104, 343-351.
34. Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Ann Behav Med, 24, 236-243.
35. Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S. S., DeVries, M. W. (1999). Ecological momentary assessment. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz (Eds.). Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
36. Ventry, I. M., & Weinstein, B. E. (1982). The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear, 3, 128-134.
37. Vestergaard, M. D. (2006). Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: Longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction. Int J Audiol, 45, 382-392.
38. Vogt, D. S., King, D. W., King, L. A. (2004). Focus groups in psychological assessment: Enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychol Assess, 16, 231-243.
39. Wong, L. L., Hickson, L., McPherson, B. (2003). Hearing aid satisfaction: What does research from the past 20 years say? Trends Amplif, 7, 117-161.