The Poly Implant Prothèse breast prostheses scandal: Embodied risk and social suffering

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 147, Issue , 2015, Pages 150-157

  Greco, Cinzia ^a,b  

^a ÉCOLE DES HAUTES ÉTUDES EN SCIENCES SOCIALES   (France)

^b EHESS Sciences   (France)

Author keywords

Biological citizenship; Breast implants; Breast surgery; Cancer; Embodied risk; France; Moral economy; Social suffering

Indexed keywords

CANCER; ETHICS; HEALTH RISK; MEDICINE; MORALITY; SAFETY;

ARTICLE; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST PROSTHESIS; CITIZENSHIP; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MORALITY; PATIENT MONITORING; POLICY; REIMBURSEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL SUFFERING; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHEMISTRY; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; FEMALE; FRANCE; FRAUD; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PSYCHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR;

FRANCE;

SILICONE GEL;

BREAST; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FRANCE; FRAUD; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SILICONE GELS;

EID: 84946846218     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.068     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. AFSSAPS Résultats des tests sur les implants mammaires à la base de gel de silicone de la société Poly Implant Prothèse 2010, Information sheet (fiche d'information), Report, September 2010.
2. AFSSAPS État des lieux des contrôles opérés par les autorités sanitaires sur la société Poly Implant Prothèse 2012, Report, February 2012.
3. Angell M. Science on Trial. The Clash of Medical Evidence and the Law in the Breast Implant Case 1997, W.W. Norton, New York.
4. Annandale E., Hunt K. Accounts of disagreements with doctors. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998, 46(1):119-129.
5. ANSM PIP Breast Implants. Situation Update 2013, Report, April 2013.
6. ANSM Données PIP. Mise à jour des signalements de matériovigilance 2015, Report, July 2015.
7. Barnsley G.P., Sigurdson L., Barnsley S. Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plastic Reconstr. Surg. 2006, 117(7):2182-2190.
8. Beck U. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity 1992, Sage, London.
9. Berry M.G., Davies D.M. Breast augmentation: part I - a review of the silicone prosthesis. J. Plastic, Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2010, 63(11):1761-1768.
10. Carricaburu D. Innovation thérapeutique et acceptabilité du risque iatrogène: l'introduction des produits antihémophiliques concentrés dans les années soixante-dix. Sci. Sociales Santé 1999, 17(4):75-98.
11. Duster T. The structural anecdote in social analysis. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco 1989.
12. Edmonds A. Can medicine be aesthetic? Disentangling beauty and health in elective surgeries. Med. Anthropol. Q 2013, 27(2):233-252.
13. Edmonds A., Sanabria E. Medical borderlands: engineering the body with plastic surgery and hormonal therapies in Brazil. Anthropol. Med. 2014, 21(2):202-216.
14. Essig L. American Plastic. Boob Jobs, Credit Cards, and Our Quest for Perfection 2010, Beacon Press, Boston.
15. Fillion E. Clinical relationships tested by iatrogenicity: the case of haemophiliac patients faced with the epidemic of transfusional AIDS. Soc. Sci. Med. 2008, 67(9):1400-1409.
16. Greco C. Shining a light on the grey zones of gender construction: breast surgery in France and Italy. J. Gend. Stud. 2015, forthcoming. 10.1080/09589236.2014.987653.
17. Hersch J. Breast implants: regulation, litigation, and science. Regulation through Litigation 2002, 142-177. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, DC. W. Kip Viscusi (Ed.).
18. Holmes S.M. Fresh Fruit, Broken Bodies. Migrant Farmworkers in the United States 2013, University of California Press, Berkeley, Ca.
19. Jérôme P. Un maxi-procès pour les implants low cost de PIP. L'Humanité 2013, April 17 2013. Retrieved from, (accessed 20.04.15). http://www.humanite.fr/societe/un-maxi-proces-pour-les-implants-low-cost-de-pip-520449.
20. Kavanagh A.M., Broom D.H. Embodied risk: my body, myself?. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998, 46(3):437-444.
21. Keshavjee S., Weiser S., Kleinman A. Medicine betrayed: hemophilia patients and HIV in the US. Soc. Sci. Med. 2001, 53(8):1081-1094.
22. Klawiter M. Breast cancer in two regimes: the impact of social movements on illness experience. Sociol. Health & Illn. 2004, 26(6):845-874.
23. Kleinman A., Das V., Lock M. Introduction. Social Suffering 1997, ix-xxvii. In Id. (Eds.), University of California Press, Berkeley.
24. Latham M. 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it?' Scandals, 'risk', and cosmetic surgery regulation in the UK and France. Med. Law Rev. 2014, 22(3):384-408.
25. Lipworth L., McLaughlin J. The safety of breast implants: epidemiological studies. (2012) Biomaterials in Plastic Surgery. Breast Implants 2012, 121-153. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford. W. Peters, H. Brandon, K.L. Jerina, C. Wolf, V.L. Young (Eds.).
26. Löwy I. Preventive Strikes. Women, Precancer, and Prophylactic Surgery 2010, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
27. Löwy I. Treating health risks or putting healthy women at risk: controversies around chemoprevention of breast cancer. Ways of Regulating Drugs in the 19th and 20th Centuries 2012, 206-227. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills. J.-P. Gaudillière, V. Hess (Eds.).
28. Manderson L. Anthropologies of Cancer and risk, uncertainty and disruption. A Companion to Medical Anthropology 2011, 323-338. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester. M. Singer, P.I. Erickson (Eds.).
29. Martindale V., Menache A. The PIP scandal: an analysis of the process of quality control that failed to safeguard women from the health risks. J. R. Soc. Med. 2013, 106(5):173-177.
30. Miller L. Mammary Mania in Japan. Positions 2003, 11(2):271-300.
31. Mirivel J.C. The physical examination in cosmetic surgery: communication strategies to promote the desirability of surgery. Health Commun. 2008, 23(2):153-170.
32. O'Dowd A. UK recommends PIP implants should not be removed. BMJ 2011, 343:d8313.
33. O'Dowd A. Only women with symptoms need to have their breast implants removed, says government. BMJ 2012, 344:e478.
34. Oulharj S., Pauchot J., Tropet Y. PIP breast implant removal: a study of 828 cases. J. Plastic, Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2014, 67(3):302-307.
35. Panter-Brick C., Eggerman M. Understanding culture, resilience, and mental health: the production of hope. The Social Ecology of Resilience. A Handbook of Theory and Practice 2012, 369-386. Springer, New York. M. Ungar (Ed.).
36. Petryna A. Life Exposed. Biological Citizens after Chernobyl 2002, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
37. Ravaz C. L'affaire des prosthèses mammaires toxiques PIP. Un scandale planétaire 2012, (La Garde: Esprit de Contradiction, kindle edition).
38. Rose N., Novas C. Biological citizenship. Global Assemblages. Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems 2005, 439-463. Blackwell, Malden, Ma. A. Ong, S.J. Collier (Eds.).
39. Sánchez-Guerrero J., Colditz G.A., Karlson E.W., Hunter D.J., Speizer F.E., Liang M.H. Silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases and symptoms. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 332:1666-1670.
40. Sanchez Taylor J. Fake breasts and power: gender, class and cosmetic surgery. Women's Stud. Int. Forum 2012, 35(6):458-466.
41. SCENIHR Opinion on the Safety of Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) Silicone Breast Implants 2014, Update on the opinion of February 2012. Report, May 2014.
42. Scheper-Hughes N. Mr Tati's Holiday and João's Safari - Seeing the world through transplant tourism. Body Soc. 2011, 17(2-3):55-92.
43. Sinna R., Delay E. Voies de recherché pour la mise au point de nouvelles prothèses mammaires. Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthétique 2005, 50(5):635-642.
44. Sinna R., Rouanet F., Delaporte T., Flageul G., Delay E. Information de la patiente: les particularités de l'augmentation mammaire par prothèse. Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthétique 2005, 50(5):605-614.
45. Smith-Oka V. Fallen uterus: social suffering, bodily vigor, and social support among women in rural Mexico. Med. Anthropol. Q. 2014, 28(1):105-121.
46. Sulik G. Managing biomedical uncertainty: the technoscientific illness identity. Sociol. Health & Illn. 2009, 30(7):1059-1076.
47. Tulloch J., Lupton D. Risk and Everyday Life 2003, Sage, London.
48. Zimmermann S.M. Silicone Survivors. Women's Experiences with Breast Implants 1998, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.