The Balanced Ideological Antipathy Model: Explaining the Effects of Ideological Attitudes on Inter-Group Antipathy Across the Political Spectrum

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 41, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1607-1622

  Crawford, Jarret T ^a   Mallinas, Stephanie R ^a   Furman, Bryan J ^a  

^a The College of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

political intolerance; political psychology; prejudice; right wing authoritarianism; social dominance orientation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; ATTITUDE; AUTHORITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERSONALITY; POLITICS; PREJUDICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

ADULT; AFFECT; ATTITUDE; AUTHORITARIANISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONALITY; POLITICS; PREJUDICE; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84946820190     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167215603713     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. T.W.AdornoE.Frenkel-BrunswikD.J.LevinsonR.N.Sanford (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper.
2. L.S.AikenS.G.West (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
3. G.W.Allport (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. B.Altemeyer (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. B.Altemeyer (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In M.P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-91). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6. A.J.BerinskyG.A.HuberG.S.Lenz (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368.
7. M.J.BrandtC.ReynaJ.R.ChambersJ.T.CrawfordG.Wetherell (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 27-34.
8. J.R.ChambersB.R.SchlenkerB.Collisson (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24, 140-149.
9. J.T.Crawford (2014). Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 284-298.
10. J.T.CrawfordJ.BradyJ.M.PilanskiH.Erny (2013). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on political candidate support: The moderating role of message framing. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 5-28. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.170
11. J.T.CrawfordS.KayK.E.Duke (2015). Speaking out of both sides of their mouths: Biased political judgments within (and between) individuals. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6, 422-430.
12. J.T.CrawfordJ.M.Pilanski (2014a). The differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on political intolerance. Political Psychology, 35, 557-576.
13. J.T.CrawfordJ.M.Pilanski (2014b). Political intolerance, right and left. Political Psychology, 35, 841-851.
14. J.T.CrawfordE.Xhambazi (2015). Predicting political biases against the Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party movements. Political Psychology, 36, 111-121.
15. J.L.DuarteJ.T.CrawfordC.SternJ.HaidtL.JussimP.E.Tetlock (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral & Brain Sciences. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0140525X14000430
16. J.Duckitt (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113).
17. J.DuckittB.Bizumic (2013). Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Political Psychology, 34, 841-862.
18. J.DuckittB.BizumicS.W.KraussE.Heled (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685-715.
19. J.DuckittB.Farre (1994). Right-wing authoritarianism and political intolerance among Whites in the future majority rule South Africa. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 735-742.
20. J.DuckittK.Fisher (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199-222.
21. J.DuckittC.G.Sibley (2007). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113-130.
22. J.DuckittC.G.Sibley (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861-1893.
23. S.Feldman (2001). Authoritarianism. In N.J.SmelserP.B.Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (p. 971). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
24. S.Feldman (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41-74.
25. E.Frenkel-BrunswikD.J.LevinsonR.N.Sanford (1947). The antidemocratic personality. In E.E.MaccobyT.M.NewcombE.L.Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 636-646). New York, NY: Henry Holt.
26. J.A.FrimerD.G.GaucherN.K.Schaefer (2014). Political conservatives’ affinity for obedience to authority is loyal, not blind. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1205-1214.
27. F.Funke (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195-218.
28. A.K.HoJ.SidaniusF.PrattoS.LevinL.ThomsenN.KteilyJ.Sheehy-Skeffington (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 583-606.
29. G.HodsonK.Costello (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18, 691-698.
30. J.J.HortonD.G.RandR.J.Zeckhauser (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399-425.
31. S.IyengarS.J.Westwood (2014). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 690-707.
32. M.K.JohnsonJ.P.LabouffW.C.RowattJ.A.Patock-PeckhamR.D.Carlisle (2012). Facets of right-wing authoritarianism mediate the relationship between religious fundamentalism and attitudes toward Arabs and African Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51, 128-142.
33. J.T.JostJ.GlaserA.W.KruglanskiF.J.Sulloway (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
34. G.E.MarcusJ.L.SullivanE.Theiss-MorseS.L.Wood (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35. K.I.MavorW.R.LouisC.G.Sibley (2010). A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right-wing authoritarianism: Support for a three-factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 28-33.
36. K.I.MavorC.J.MacleodM.J.BoalW.R.Louis (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, fundamentalism and prejudice revisited: Removing suppression and statistical artefact. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 592-597.
37. D.O.SearsP.J.Henry (2003). The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 259-275.
38. C.G.SibleyJ.Duckitt (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248-279.
39. J.SidaniusF.Pratto (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40. L.J.SkitkaJ.H.LiuY.YangH.ChenL.LiuL.Xu (2013). Exploring the cross-cultural generalizability and scope of morally motivated intolerance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 324-331.
41. K.Stenner (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42. S.A.Stouffer (1955). Communism, conformity, and civil liberties. New York, NY: Doubleday.
43. P.Suedfeld (2002). Postmodernism, identity politics, and other political influences in political psychology. In K.R.Monroe (Ed.), Political psychology (pp. 315-327). London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. J.E.SullivanJ.E.Transue (1999). The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 625-650.
45. B.G.TabachnickL.S.Fidell (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
46. M.R.TagarC.M.FedericoK.E.LyonsS.LudekeM.A.Koenig (2014). Heralding the authoritarian? Orientation toward authority in early childhood. Psychological Science, 25, 883-892.
47. J.A.TerrizziJr.N.J.ShookW.L.Ventis (2010). Disgust: A predictor of social conservatism and prejudicial attitudes toward homosexuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 587-592.
48. B.TodosijevicZ.Enyedi (2008). Authoritarianism without dominant ideology: Political manifestation of authoritarian attitudes in Hungary. Political Psychology, 29, 767-787.
49. G.WetherellM.J.BrandtC.Reyna (2013). Discrimination across the ideological divide: The role of perceptions of value violations and abstract values in discrimination by liberals and conservatives. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 658-667.
50. B.E.WhitleyJr.S.E.Lee (2000). The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 144-170.
51. V.Y.YzerbytS.Demoulin (2010). Intergroup relations. In S.T.FiskeD.T.GilbertG.Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1024-1083). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.