Probing Projections: Interaction Techniques for Interpreting Arrangements and Errors of Dimensionality Reductions

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 629-638

  Stahnke, Julian ^a   Dörk, Marian ^a   Müller, Boris ^a   Thom, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Approximation error; Data visualization; Distortion; Heating; Prototypes; Stress; Visualization

Indexed keywords

DATA VISUALIZATION; DISTORTION (WAVES); ERRORS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; HEATING; STRESSES; VISUALIZATION;

APPROXIMATION ERRORS; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; INTEGRATED INTERACTION; INTERACTION TECHNIQUES; INTERACTIVE METHODS; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL DATASETS; PROJECTION TECHNIQUES; PROTOTYPES;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 84946607174     PISSN: 10772626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467717     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. M. Aupetit. Visualizing distortions and recovering topology in continuous projection techniques. Neurocomputing, 70(7):1304-1330, 2007.
2. M. Q. W. Baldonado, A. Woodruff, and A. Kuchinsky. Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. In AVI 2000: Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 110-119. ACM, 2000.
3. I. Borg and P. J. F. Groenen. Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. Springer Verlag, 2005.
4. M. Brehmer, M. Sedlmair, S. Ingram, and T. Munzner. Visualizing dimensionally-reduced data: Interviews with analysts and a characterization of task sequences. In Proc. ACM BELIV Workshop, 2014.
5. A. Buja and D. F. Swayne. Visualization methodology for multidimensional scaling. Journal of Classification, 19(1):7-43, 2002.
6. J. Chuang, D. Ramage, C. Manning, and J. Heer. Interpretation and trust: designing model-driven visualizations for text analysis. In CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 443-452. ACM, 2012.
7. M. Dörk, S. Carpendale, and C. Williamson. Visualizing explicit and implicit relations of complex information spaces. Information Visualization, 11(1):5-21, 2012.
8. A. Endert, P. Fiaux, and C. North. Semantic interaction for visual text analytics. In CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 473-482. ACM, 2012.
9. M. Gleicher. Explainers: Expert explorations with crafted projections. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 19(12):2042-2051, 2013.
10. N. Heulot, M. Aupetit, and J. Fekete. Proxilens: Interactive exploration of high-dimensional data using projections. In Proceedings of the EuroVis Workshop on Visual Analytics using Multidimensional Projections, pages 11-15, 2013.
11. J. Hullman and N. Diakopoulos. Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization. TVCG: Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):2231-2240, Dec 2011.
12. S. Ingram, T. Munzner, V. Irvine, M. Tory, S. Bergner, and T. Moller. Dimstiller: Workflows for dimensional analysis and reduction. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2010 IEEE Symposium on, pages 3-10. IEEE, 2010.
13. S. Ingram, T. Munzner, and M. Olano. Glimmer: Multilevel mds on the gpu. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(2):249-261, 2009.
14. A. Inselberg and B. Dimsdale. Parallel coordinates: a tool for visualizing multi-dimensional geometry. In Proceedings of the 1st conference on Visualization '90, pages 361-378. IEEE, 1990.
15. S. Johansson and J. Johansson. Interactive dimensionality reduction through user-defined combinations of quality metrics. TVCG: Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6):993-1000, Nov/Dec 2009.
16. J. Kruskal. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29(1):1-27, 1964.
17. S. Lespinats and M. Aupetit. Checkviz: Sanity check and topological clues for linear and non-linear mappings. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 30, pages 113-125. Wiley Online Library, 2011.
18. J. M. Lewis, L. Van Der Maaten, and V. R. de Sa. A behavioral investigation of dimensionality reduction. In Proc. of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 671-676, 2012.
19. A. M. MacEachren, R. E. Roth, J. O'Brien, B. Li, D. Swingley, and M. Gahegan. Visual semiotics & uncertainty visualization: An empirical study. TVCG: Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12):2496-2505, 2012.
20. A. Pandey, A. Manivannan, O. Nov, M. Satterthwaite, and E. Bertini. The persuasive power of data visualization. TVCG: Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12):2211-2220, Dec 2014.
21. M. Sedlmair, M. Brehmer, S. Ingram, and T. Munzner. Dimensionality reduction in the wild: Gaps and guidance. Dept. Comput. Sci., Univ. British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Tech. Rep. TR-2012-03, 2012.
22. M. Sedlmair, T. Munzner, and M. Tory. Empirical guidance on scatterplot and dimension reduction technique choices. TVCG: Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12):2634-2643, 2013.
23. C. Seifert, V. Sabol, and W. Kienreich. Stress maps: analysing local phenomena in dimensionality reduction based visualisations. In EuroVAST 2010: International Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2010.
24. B. W. Silverman. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, volume 26. CRC press, 1986.
25. A. Skupin and S. Fabrikant. Spatialization methods: A cartographic research agenda for non-geographic information visualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30(2):99-120, 2003.
26. A. Tal and B. Wansink. Blinded with science: Trivial graphs and formulas increase ad persuasiveness and belief in product efficacy. Public Understanding of Science, 2014.
27. M. Tory, C. Swindells, and R. Dreezer. Comparing dot and landscape spatializations for visual memory differences. TVCG: Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6):1033-1039, Nov/Dec 2009.
28. M. O. Ward. Xmdvtool: Integrating multiple methods for visualizing multivariate data. In Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization'94, pages 326-333. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994.
29. W. Willett, J. Heer, and M. Agrawala. Scented widgets: Improving navigation cues with embedded visualizations. TVCG: Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6):1129-1136, Nov/Dec 2007.
30. M. Williams and T. Munzner. Steerable, progressive multidimensional scaling. In InfoVis 2004: Symposium on Information Visualization, pages 57-64. IEEE, 2004.
31. J. A. Wise, J. J. Thomas, K. Pennock, D. Lantrip, M. Pottier, A. Schur, and V. Crow. Visualizing the non-visual: Spatial analysis and interaction with information from text documents. In InfoVis 1995: Symposium on Information Visualization, pages 51-58. IEEE, 1995.