Characterization of silver nanoparticle-infused tissue adhesive for ophthalmic use

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 55, Issue , 2016, Pages 67-74

  Yee, William ^a   Selvaduray, Guna ^a   Hawkins, Benjamin ^a  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibacterial; Material characterization; Nanoparticles; Ophthalmic application; Tissue adhesive

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; CHARACTERIZATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METAL NANOPARTICLES; NANOPARTICLES; TENSILE TESTING; TISSUE;

AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS; ANTIBACTERIAL; ANTIBACTERIAL EFFICACY; BREAKING STRENGTH; MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATIONS; NANOPARTICLE SIZES; TISSUE ADHESIVES; UNIVERSAL TESTING MACHINES;

SILVER NANOPARTICLES;

CYANOACRYLIC ACID OCTYL ESTER; SILVER NANOPARTICLE; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; CYANOACRYLATE DERIVATIVE; METAL NANOPARTICLE; OCTYL 2-CYANOACRYLATE; SILVER; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; DOPING; DRUG EFFICACY; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCLERA; STRENGTH; SUTURE; ADHESION; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; EYE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICS; TENSILE STRENGTH; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADHESIVENESS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CYANOACRYLATES; EYE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; METAL NANOPARTICLES; SILVER; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ADHESIVES; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84946606169     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aukerman D.F., Sebastianelli W.J., Nashelsky J. Clinical inquiries. How does tissue adhesive compare with suturing for superficial lacerations?. J. Fam. Pract. 2005, 54:378.
2. Banitt M., Malta J.B., Soong H.K., Musch D.C., Mian S.I. Wound integrity of clear corneal incisions closed with fibrin and N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesives. Curr. Eye Res. 2009, 34:706-710. [pii]. 10.1080/02713680903019993.
3. Berdahl J.P. Comparison of sutures and dendritic polymer adhesives for corneal laceration repair in an in vivo chicken model. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2009, 127:442. 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.582.
4. Deka H., Karak N., Kalita R.D., Buragohain A.K. Bio-based thermostable, biodegradable and biocompatible hyperbranched polyurethane/Ag nanocomposites with antimicrobial activity. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95:1509-1517. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.017.
5. Duarte A.P., Coelho J.F., Bordado J.C., Cidade M.T., Gil M.H. Surgical adhesives: systematic review of the main types and development forecast. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.12.003.
6. Farion K.J. Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2003, 10:110-118. 10.1197/aemj.10.2.110.
7. Fresta M., Puglisi G., Giammona G., Cavallaro G., Micali N., Furneri P.M. Pefloxacine mesilate- and ofloxacin-loaded polyethylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles: characterization of the colloidal drug carrier formulation. J. Pharm. Sci. 1995, 84:895-902. 10.1002/jps.2600840721.
8. Grinstaff M.W. Designing hydrogel adhesives for corneal wound repair. Biomaterials 2007, 28:5205-5214. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.041.
9. Gunasekaran T., Nigusse T., Dhanaraju M.D. Silver nanoparticles as real topical bullets for wound healing. J. Am. Coll. Clin. Wound Spec. 2011, 10.1016/j.jcws.2012.05.001.
10. Hajipour M.J., Fromm K.M., Akbar Ashkarran A., Jimenez de Aberasturi D., Larramendi I.R., de Rojo T., Serpooshan V., Parak W.J., Mahmoudi M. Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol. 2012, 30:499-511. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.06.004.
11. Hamouda T., Hayes M.M., Cao Z., Tonda R., Johnson K., Wright D.C., Brisker J., Baker J.R. A novel surfactant nanoemulsion with broad-spectrum sporicidal activity against Bacillus species. J. Infect. Dis. 1999, 180:1939-1949. 10.1086/315124.
12. Hida T., Sheta S.M., Proia A.D., McCuen B.W. Retinal toxicity of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in the rabbit. Retina 1988, 8:148-153. 10.1097/00006982-198808020-00013.
13. Hudzicki, J., 2009. Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol [WWW Document]. ASM Microbe Libr. URL (accessed 10.3.12.). http://www.microbelibrary.org/component/resource/laboratory-test/3189-kirby-bauer-disk-diffusion-susceptibility-test-protocol.
14. Hung S.H., Tseng T.M., Hsu H., Te, Tseng H. Adhesive strength of ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive: how strong is it?. Surg. Today 2014, 44:927-932. 10.1007/s00595-013-0777-0.
15. Ip M. Antimicrobial activities of silver dressings: an in vitro comparison. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55:59-63. 10.1099/jmm.0.46124-0.
16. Lansdown A.B.G. Silver 2: toxicity in mammals and how its products aid wound repair. J. Wound Care 2002, 11:173-177. 10.12968/jowc.2002.11.5.26398.
17. Lansdown A.B.G. Silver I: its antibacterial properties and mechanism of action. J. Wound Care 2002, 11:125-130. 10.12968/jowc.2002.11.4.26389.
18. Lee W.-F., Tsao K.-T. Effect of silver nanoparticles content on the various properties of nanocomposite hydrogels by in situ polymerization. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 10.1007/s10853-009-3896-7.
19. Li Y., Zhang W., Niu J., Chen Y. Mechanism of photogenerated reactive oxygen species and correlation with the antibacterial properties of engineered metal-oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2012, 6:5164-5173. 10.1021/nn300934k.
20. Liu H.L., Dai S.A., Fu K.Y., Hsu S. hui Antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles in three different sizes and their nanocomposites with a new waterborne polyurethane. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 5:1017-1028. 10.2147/IJN.S14572.
21. Marsich E., Travan A., Donati I., Turco G., Kulkova J., Moritz N., Aro H.T., Crosera M., Paoletti S. Biological responses of silver-coated thermosets: an in vitro and in vivo study. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9:5088-5099. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.002.
22. Morones J.R., Elechiguerra J.L., Camacho A., Holt K., Kouri J.B., Ramírez J.T., Yacaman M.J. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2005, 16:2346-2353. 10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/059.
23. Pan H.-W., Zhong J.-X., Jing C.-X. Comparison of fibrin glue versus suture for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2011, 118:1049-1054. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.033.
24. Raghupathi K.R., Koodali R.T., Manna A.C. Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 2011, 27:4020-4028. 10.1021/la104825u.
25. Rai M., Yadav A., Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002.
26. Ritterband D.C., Meskin S.W., Shapiro D.E., Kusmierczyk J., Seedor J.A., Koplin R.S. Laboratory model of tissue adhesive (2-octyl cyanoacrylate) in sealing clear corneal cataract wounds. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2005, 140. 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.06.055.
27. Romero I., Malta J.N.S., Silva C., Mimica L.J., Soong K., Hida R. Antibacterial properties of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive: Does the polymerization reaction play a role?. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2009, 57:341. 10.4103/0301-4738.55065.
28. Singer A.J., Thode H.C. A review of the literature on octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Am. J. Surg. 2004, 187:238-248. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.017.
29. Travan A., Marsich E., Donati I., Benincasa M., Giazzon M., Felisari L., Paoletti S. Silver-polysaccharide nanocomposite antimicrobial coatings for methacrylic thermosets. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7:337-346. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.024.
30. Travan A., Pelillo C., Donati I., Marsich E., Benincasa M., Scarpa T., Semeraro S., Turco G., Gennaro R., Paoletti S. Non-cytotoxic silver nanoparticle-polysaccharide nanocomposites with antimicrobial activity. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:1429-1435. 10.1021/bm900039x.
31. Zhou Y., Zhao Y., Wang L., Xu L., Zhai M., Wei S. Radiation synthesis and characterization of nanosilver/gelatin/carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81:553-560. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.01.014.