Assessing Connectivity Between an Overlying Aquifer and a Coal Seam Gas Resource Using Methane Isotopes, Dissolved Organic Carbon and Tritium

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Iverach, Charlotte P ^a   Cendón, Dioni I ^a,b   Hankin, Stuart I ^b   Lowry, David ^c   Fisher, Rebecca E ^c   France, James L ^d   Nisbet, Euan G ^c   Baker, Andy ^a   Kelly, Bryce F J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946595496     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep15996     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Vidic, R. D., Brantley, S. L., Vandenbossche, J. M., Yoxtheimer, D. & Abad, J. D. Impact of Shale Gas Development on Regional Water Quality. Science. 340, 1235009-1-9, doi: 10.1126/science.1235009 (2013).
2. Roy, J. W. & Ryan, M. C. Effects of unconventional gas development on groundwater: a call for total dissolved gas pressure field measurements. Groundwater. 51(4), 480-482, doi: 10.1111/gwat.12065 (2013).
3. Vengosh, A., Jackson, R. B., Warner, N., Darrah, T. H. & Kondash, A. A Critical Review of the Risks to Water Resources from Unconventional Shale Gas Development and Hydraulic Fracturing in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 8334-8348, doi: 10.1021/es405118y (2014).
4. Moritz, A. et al. Methane Baseline Concentrations and Sources in Shallow Aquifers from the Shale Gas-Prone Region of the St. Lawrence Lowlands (Quebec, Canada). Environ. Sci. Technol. Article ASAP, doi: 10.1021.acs.est.5b00443 (2015).
5. Heilweil, V. M. et al. Stream Measurements Locate Thermogenic Methane Fluxes in Groundwater Discharge in an Area of Shale-Gas Development. Environ. Sci. Technol. Article ASAP, doi: 10.1021/es503882b (2015).
6. Osborn, S. G., Vengosh, A., Warner, N. R. & Jackson, R. B. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 8172-8176, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100682108 (2011).
7. Jackson, R. B. et al. Increased stray gas abundance in a subset of drinking water wells near Marcellus shale gas extraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(28), 11250-11255, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221635110 (2013).
8. Lamb, B. K. et al. Direct Measurements Show Decreasing Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Local Distribution Systems in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. Article ASAP, doi: 10.1021/es505116p (2015).
9. Siegel, D. I., Azzolina, N. A., Smith, B. J., Perry, A. E. & Bothun, R. L. Methane Concentrations in Water Wells Unrelated to Proximity to Existing Oil and Gas Wells in Northeastern Pennsylvania. Environ. Sci. Technol. Article ASAP, doi: 10.1021/es505775c (2015).
10. Ward, C. R. & Kelly, B. F. J. Background Paper on New South Wales Geology. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (2013).
11. Barker, J. F. & Fritz, P. The occurrence and origin of methane in some groundwater flow systems. Can. J. Earth. Sci. 18, 1802-1816, doi: 10.1139/e81-168 (1981).
12. Fontenot, B. E. et al. An evaluation of water quality in private drinking water wells near natural gas extraction sites in the Barnett Shale Formation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 10032-10040, doi: 10.1021/es4011724 (2013).
13. Hakala, J. A. Use of stable isotopes to identify sources of methane in Appalachian Basin shallow groundwaters: a review. Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts. 16, 2080-2086, doi: 10.1039/c4em00140k (2014).
14. Sharma, S., Mulder, M. L., Sack, A., Schroeder, K. & Hammack, R. Isotope Approach to Assess Hydrologic Connections During Marcellus Shale Drilling. Groundwater. 1-10, doi: 10.1111/gwat.12083 (2013).
15. Moore, T. A. Coalbed methane: a review. Int. J. Coal Geol. 101, 36-81, doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2012.05.011 (2012).
16. Upper Condamine Alluviums groundwater system. Queensland Government, Dept. of Natural Resources and Mines, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia, 2012.
17. Arrow Energy, Our Operations (2015). Available at: http://www.arrowenergy.com.au/our-company/our-projects (Accessed: 27th March 2015).
18. Surat Gas Project - Environmental Impact Statement, Arrow Energy Pty Ltd, Queensland, Australia, 2012.
19. 13C Values in the Atmosphere of Two Australian Coal Seam Gas Fields. Water Air Soil Pollut. 225, 2216 (1-9). doi: 10.1007/s11270-014-2216-2 (2014).
20. Owen, D. D. R. & Cox, M. E. Hydrochemical evolution within a large alluvial groundwater resource overlying a shallow coal seam gas reservoir. Sci. Total. Environ. 523, 233-252, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.115 (2015).
21. Day, S., Connell, L., Etheridge, D., Norgate, T. & Sherwood, N. Fugitive greenhouse gas emissions from coal seam gas production in Australia. CSIRO, Australia (2012).
22. Duvert, C. et al. Hydrochemical processes in a shallow coal seam gas aquifer and its overlying stream-alluvial system: Implications for recharge and inter-aquifer connectivity. Appl. Geochem. 61, 146-159, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.05.021 (2015).
23. Kelly, B. F. J. & Merrick, N. P. Groundwater Knowledge and Gaps in the Condamine Alliance Area for the Cotton Catchment Communities CRC, University of Technology, Sydney - National Center for Groundwater Management Report, NCGM 2006/9d, 49 pages (2007).
24. Dafny, E. & Silburn, D. M. The hydrogeology of the Condamine River Alluvial Aquifer, Australia: a critical assessment. Hydrogeology Journal. 22, 705-727, doi: 10.1007/s10040-013-1075-z (2014).
25. Hamilton, S. K., Esterle, J. S. & Golding, S. D. Geological interpretation of gas content trends, Walloon Subgroup, eastern Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Int. J. Coal Geol. 101, 21-35, doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2012.07.001 (2012).
26. Conceptualisation of the Walloon Coal Measures beneath the Condamine Alluvium - Final Report. KCB (Klohn Crippen Berger), Dept. of Environment and Resource Management, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia, 2011.
27. Hillier, J. R. Groundwater connections between the Walloon Coal Measures and the Alluvium of the Condamine River. Central Downs Irrigators Limited, Bribie Island, Queensland, Australia, 2010.
28. Kelly, B. F. J. et al. A reassessment of the Lower Namoi Catchment aquifer architecture and hydraulic connectivity with reference to climate drivers. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 61(3), 501-511, doi: 10.1080/08120099.2014.900647 (2014).
29. Fisher, R. E. et al. Arctic methane sources: Isotopic evidence for atmospheric inputs. Geophys. Res. Letters. 38 (21), L21803 (1-6), doi: 10.1029/2011GL049319 (2011).
30. Quay, P. et al. The isotopic composition of atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 13, 445-461, doi: 10.1029/1998GB900006 (1999).
31. Whiticar, M. J. Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chem. Geol. 161, 291-314, doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00092-3 (1999).
32. Qin, S., Tang, X., Song, Y. & Wang, H. Distribution and fractionation mechanism of stable carbon isotope of coalbed methane. Sci. in China Series D: Earth Sci. 49(12), 1252-1258, doi: 10.1007/s11430-006-2036-3 (2006).
33. Cuna, S. et al. Separating contributions from natural and anthropogenic sources in atmospheric methane from the Black Sea region, Romania. Appl. Geochem. 23, 2871-2879, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.04.019 (2008).
34. Valentine, D. L. & Reeburgh, W. S. New perspectives on anaerobic methane oxidation. Env. Microbiol. 2, 477-484, doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00135.x (2000).
35. Antler, G. Sulfur and oxygen isotope tracing of sulfate driven anaerobic methane oxidation in estuarine sediments. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sci. 142, 4-11, doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00135.x (2014).
36. Green-Saxena, A., Dekas, A. E., Dalleska, N. F. & Orphan, V. J. Nitrate-based niche differentiation by distinct sulfate-reducing bacteria involved in the anaerobic oxidation of methane. The ISME J. 8, 150-163, doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.147 (2014).
37. Knittel, K. & Boetius, A. Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane: Progress with an Unknown Process. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 311-334, doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093130 (2009).
38. Nisbet, E. G., Dlugokencky, E. J. & Bousquet, P. Methane on the rise - again. Science. 343, 493-494, doi: 10.1126/science.1247828 (2014).
39. Stalker, L. Methane Origins and Behaviour. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia, 2013; www.chiefscientist.nsw.gov.au/-data/assets/pdf-file/0006/38337/NSW-Chief-S-and-E-Methane-Origins-28-11-13-LS-v2.pdf.
40. Integrating a remotely deployed stable isotope Picarro CRDS with a global monitoring network. Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Victoria, Australia, 2013
41. Dlugokencky, E. J., Nisbet, E. G., Fisher, R. & Lowry, D. Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 369, 2058-2072, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0341 (2011).
42. Kinnon, E. C. P., Golding, S. D., Boreham, C. J., Baublys, K. A. & Esterle, J. S. Stable isotope and water quality analysis of coal bed methane production waters and gases from the Bowen Basin, Australia. Int. J. Coal Geol. 82, 219-231, doi: 10.1016/j. coal.2009.10.014 (2010).
43. Hamilton, S. K., Golding, S. D., Baublys, K. A. & Esterle, J. S. Stable isotopic and molecular composition of desorbed coal seam gases from the Walloon Subgroup, eastern Surat Basin, Australia. Int. J. Coal Geol. 122, 21-36, doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2013.12.003 (2014).
44. Papendick, S. L. et al. Biogenic methane potential for Surat Basin, Queensland coal seams. Int. J. Coal Geol. 88, 123-134, doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2011.09.005 (2011).
45. Keeling, C. D. The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta. 13, 322-334, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(58)90033-4 (1958).
46. Keeling, C. D. The concentration and isotopic abundances of carbon dioxide in rural and marine air. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta. 24, 277-298, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(61)90023-0 (1961).
47. Pataki, D. E. et al. The application and interpretation of Keeling plots in terrestrial carbon cycle research. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 17, 1022-1037, doi: 10.1029/2001GB001850 (2003).
48. Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 9.0, Champagne, IL, 2012.
49. Chen, X. Y., Lintern, M. J. & Roach, I. C. Calcrete: characteristics, distribution and use in mineral exploration. Cooperative Research Centre for Landscape Environments and Mineral Exploration, 160 pages (2002).
50. Chapelle, F. H. in Groundwater Microbiology and Geochemistry (John Wiley & Sons, 2001).
51. Central Condamine Alluvium, Stage II - Conceptual hydrogeology study. KCB (Klohn Crippen Berger), Dept. of Environment and Resource Management, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia, 2010.
52. Phillips, N. G. et al. Mapping urban pipeline leaks: Methane leaks across Boston. Environ. Poll. 173, 1-4, doi: 10.1016/j. envpol.2012.11.003 (2013).
53. Queensland Government Queensland Spatial Catalogue, Land use mapping - South East Queensland NRM region (2015). Available at: http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/detail.page?fid={C3CD23AD-7101-4765-8BED-AFC2C5DF1F5F} (First accessed: 24 August 2015).
54. Queensland Government Data, Coal seam gas well locations - Queensland (2013). Available at: https://data.qld.gov.au/dataset/queensland-borehole-series/resource/e57de19e-e471-4fb9-b87e-c970d71a4ef0 (First accessed: 2013).
55. QGIS 2.8.2 Wien, 2015, MapQuest and Open Street Map licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 license (CC-BY-SA).
56. Corel Corporation, Corel Painter Education, Version 14.1.0.1105 (2015).