Longitudinal mixed-effects models for latent cognitive function

Statistical Modelling

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 366-387

  Hout, Ardo van den ^a   Fox, Jean Paul ^b   Muniz Terrera, Graciela ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bent cable; Change point; cognition; growth curve model; item response theory (ITR); longitudinal data analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946541123     PISSN: 1471082X     EISSN: 14770342     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1471082X14555607     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. F.BartolucciM.LupparelliG.E.Montanari (2009) Latent Markov model for longitudinal binary data: An application to the performance evaluation of nursing homes. Annals of Applied Statistics, 3, 491-879.
2. B.P.CarlinT.A.Louis (2009) Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis, Third Edition. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
3. G.ChiuR.LockhartR.Routledge (2006) Bent-cable regression theory and applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 542-53.
4. P.Cohen (ed.) (2008) Applied data analytic techniques for turning points research. New York: Routledge.
5. J.A.Douglas (1999) Item response models for longitudinal quality of life data in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 2917-31.
6. M.F.FolsteinS.E.FolsteinP.R.McHugh (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-98.
7. J.-P.Fox (2010) Bayesian item response modelling. New York: Springer.
8. J.-P.FoxC.A.W.Glas (2001) Bayesian estimation of a multilevel IRT model using Gibbs sampling. Psychometrika, 66, 271-88.
9. S.GeisserW.F.Eddy (1979) A predictive approach to model selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 153-60.
10. A.E.GelfandD.Dey (1994) Bayesian model choice: asymptotic and exact calculations. Journal Royal Statistical Society B, 56, 501-14.
11. A.E.GelfandS.K.Ghosh (1998) Model choice: A minimum posterior predictive loss approach. Biometrika, 85, 1-11.
12. A.E.GelfandS.E.HillsA.Racine-PoonA.F.M.Smith (1990) Illustration of Bayesian inference in normal data models using Gibbs sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 972-85.
13. A.GelmanD.B.Rubin (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7, 457-511.
14. A.GelmanJ.B.CarlinH.S.SternD.B.Rubin (2004) Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
15. H.HollingW.BöhningD.Böhning (2012) Meta-analysis of diagnostic studies based upon SROC-curves: a mixed model approach using the Lehmann family. Statistical Modelling, 12, 347-75.
16. H.Jacqmin-GaddaD.CommengesJ.-F.Dartigues (2006) Random changepoint model for joint modelling of cognitive decline and dementia. Biometrics, 62, 254-60.
17. V.E.JohnsonJ.H.Albert (1999) Ordinal data modelling. New York: Springer.
18. E.R.H.KleinEntink RHJ.P.FoxA.Van den Hout (2011) A mixture model for the joint analysis of latent developmental trajectories and survival. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 2310-25.
19. W.LaudJ.G.Ibrahim (1995) Predictive model selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 57, 247-62.
20. C.Lévy-LeducF.Roueff (2009) Detection and localization of change-points in high-dimensional network traffic data. Annals of Applied Statistics, 3, 637-62.
21. D.LunnC.JacksonN.BestA.ThomasD.Spiegelhalter (2012) The BUGS book: A practical introduction to Bayesian analysis. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
22. D.LunnD.SpiegelhalterT.ThomasN.Best (2009) The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 3049-67.
23. G.MolenberghsG.Verbeke (2001) A review on linear mixed models for longitudinal data, possibly subject to dropout. Statistical Modelling, 1, 235-69.
24. V.M.R.MuggeoD.C.AtkinsR.J.GallopD.SonaDimidjian (2014). Segmented mixed models with random changepoints: a maximum likelihood approach with application to treatment for depression study. Statistical Modelling, 14, 293-313
25. J.C.PinheiroD.Bates (2000) Mixed effects models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer.
26. M.Plummer (2008) Penalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison. Biostatistics, 9, 523-39.
27. M.PlummerN.BestK.CowlesK.Vines (2006) CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News, 6, 7-11.
28. K.F.RiegelR.M.Riegel (1972) Development, drop, and death. Developmental Psychology, 6, 306-19.
29. D.B.Rubin (1976) Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581-92.
30. F.Samejima (1997) The graded response model. In WJ van der Linden and RK Hambleton (eds) Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer, pp. 85-100.
31. D.J.SpiegelhalterN.G.BestB.P.CarlinA.Van der Linde (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal Royal Statistical Society B, 4, 583-640.
32. D.M.StasinopoulosR.A.Rigby (1992) Detecting break points in generalised linear models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 13, 461-71.
33. A.TishlerI.Zang (1981) A new maximum likelihood algorithm for piecewise regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 980-87.
34. W.J.Van der LindenR.K.Hambelton (1997) Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York: Springer.
35. A.Van den HoutG.Muniz-TerreraF.E.Matthews (2011) Smooth random change point models. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 599-610.
36. A.Van den HoutG.Muniz-TerreraF.E.Matthews (2013) Change point models for cognitive tests using semi-parametric likelihood. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 57, 684-98.
37. G.VerbekeG.Molenbergh (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer.
38. X.WangJ.O.BergerB.S.Burdick (2013) Bayesian analysis of dynamic item response models in educational testing. Annals of Applied Statistics, 7, 126-53