Use of Health Behavior Theory in Funded Grant Proposals: Cancer Screening Interventions as a Case Study

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 809-818

  Kobrin, Sarah ^a   Ferrer, Rebecca ^a   Meissner, Helen ^b   Tiro, Jasmin ^c   Hall, Kara ^a   Shmueli Blumberg, Dikla ^d   Rothman, Alex ^e  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d EMMES CORPORATION   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral theory; Cancer screening; Grant proposal; Use of theory

Indexed keywords

EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY;

EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC;

EID: 84946492745     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-015-9714-3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bartholomew LK, Mullen PD. Five roles for using theory and evidence in the design and testing of behavior change interventions. J Public Health Dent. 2011; 71(s1): S20-S33.
2. Rimer BK, Glanz K, Rasband G. Searching for evidence about health education and behavior interventions. Health Educ Behav. 2001; 28(2): 231-248.
3. Rothman AJ. Exploring connections between moderators and mediators: Commentary on subgroup analyses in intervention research. Prev Sci. 2013; 14I: 189-192.
4. Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Am Rev Public Health. 2010; 31: 399-418.
5. Bowen DJ, Allen JD, Vu T, et al. Theoretical foundations for interventions designed to promote informed decision making for cancer screening. Ann Behav Med. 2006; 32(3): 202-210.
6. Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8(9): 749-757.
7. Yabroff KR, O’Malley A, Mangan P, et al. Inreach and outreach interventions to improve mammography use. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2001; 56(4): 166-173.
8. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, et al. Using the Internet to promote health behaviour change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behaviour change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12(1): 6.
9. Jeffery RW. How can health behavior theory be made more useful for intervention research? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004; 1: 10.
10. Rothman AJ. “Is there nothing more practical than a good theory?”: Why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are used to test and refine theory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004; 1: 11.
11. Painter JE, Borba CPC, Hynes M, et al. The use of theory in health behavior research from 2000–2005. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 35: 358-362.
12. Michie S, Hardeman W, Fanshawe T, et al. Investigating theoretical explanations for behaviour change: The case study of ProActive. Psychol Health. 2008; 23(1): 25-39.
13. Noar SM, Zimmerman RS. Health behavior theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction? Health Educ Res. 2005; 20(3): 275-290.
14. Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory based? Development of a coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010; 29(1): 1-8.
15. Michie S, Abraham C, Eccles MP, et al. Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: A study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 10.
16. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterizing and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011; 6(42): 6-42.
17. Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, et al. From theory to intervention: Mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behavior change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008; 57(4): 660-680.
18. Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, et al. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and health eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health. 2011; 26(11): 1479-1498.
19. Pinto BM, Floyd A. Theories underlying health promotion interventions among cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2008; 24(3): 153-163.
20. Meissner HI, Smith RA, Rimer BK, et al. Promoting cancer screening: Learning from experience. Cancer. 2004; 101(S5): 1107-1117.
21. USPSTF, http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/adultrec.htm#cancer.
22. National Cancer Institute. Theories at a glance: A guide for health promotion practice, (second edition). NIH Publication 2005 No. 05–3896.
23. Earp JA, Ennett ST. Conceptual models for health education research and practice. Health Educ Res. 1991; 6(2): 163-171.
24. SAS version 9.2, SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
25. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983; 51: 390-395.
26. Rosenstock IM. What research in motivation suggest for public health. Am J Public Health. 1960; 50: 295-301.
27. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
28. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM. A model of the precaution adoption process: Evidence from home radon test. Health Psychol. 1992; 11: 170-180.
29. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1980.
30. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50: 179-211.
31. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007; 58: 593-614.
32. Brewer NT, Gilkey MB. Comparing theories of health behavior using data from longitudinal studies: A comment on Gerend and Shepherd. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 44(2): 147-148.
33. Weinstein ND. Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychol. 1993; 12(4): 324-333.
34. Noar SM, Mehrotra P. Toward a new methodological paradigm for testing theories of health behavior and health behavior change. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 82(3): 468-474.
35. Tiro JA, Diamond PM, Perz CA, et al. Validation of scales measuring attitudes and norms related to mammography screening in women veterans. Health Psychol. 2005; 24(6): 555-566.
36. Trost Z. Models under scrutiny: The strengths and limitations of our theoretical frameworks: A commentary on Holla et al. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 44(1): 5-6.
37. Reid AE, Aiken LS. Integration of five health behaviour models: common strengths and unique contributions to understanding condom use. Psychol Health. 2011; 26(11): 1499-1520.
38. Murphy CC, Vernon SW, Diamond PM, et al. Competitive testing of health behavior theories: How do benefits, barriers, subjective norm, and intention influence mammography behavior? Ann Behav Med. 2014; 47(1): 120-129.
39. Spencer JS, Zanna MP, Fong GT. Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005; 89(6): 845-851.
40. Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): New methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 32(5): S112-S118.
41. Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Dzewaltowski DA, et al. Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: The role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 23(Suppl): 5-14.
42. Drucker DD, Preacher KJ, Tormala ZL, et al. Mediation analysis and social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2011; 5(6): 359-371.
43. Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Nicklas T, et al. Are current health behavioral change models helpful in guiding prevention of weight gain efforts? Obes Res J. 2003; 11(S10): 23S-43S.
44. Rimer, Glanz, Viswanath Eds. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, 4th Edition. 2008.