Competitive testing of health behavior theories: How do benefits, barriers, subjective norm, and intention influence mammography behavior?

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 120-129

  Murphy, Caitlin C ^a   Vernon, Sally W ^a   Diamond, Pamela M ^a   Tiro, Jasmin A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Health behavior theory; Mammography; Theory testing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTENTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 84894485087     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-013-9528-0     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Institute of Medicine. Speaking of Health: Assessing Health Communication Strategies for Diverse Populations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2002: 28-75.
2. Noar SM, Zimmerman RS. Health Behavior Theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: Are we moving in the right direction. Health Educ Res. 2005; 20: 275-290. (Pubitemid 40732812)
3. Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ. Commentary: Revitalizing research on health behavior theories. Health Educ Res. 2005; 20: 294-297. (Pubitemid 40732814)
4. Brewer NT, Gilkey MB. Comparing theories of health behavior using data from longitudinal studies: A comment on Gerend and Shepherd. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 44: 147-148.
5. Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK, Reno RR. Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women. Health Psychol. 1994; 13: 122-129.
6. Bowie JV, Curbow B, LaVeist TA, Fitzgerald S, Zabora J. The Theory of Planned Behavior and intention to repeat mammography among African-American women. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2004; 21: 23-43.
7. Montaño DE, Taplin SH. A test of an expanded theory of reasoned action to predict mammography participation. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32: 733-741.
8. Rauscher GH, Earp JAL, O'Malley M. Relation between intervention exposures, changes in attitudes, and mammography use in the North Carolina Breast Cancer Screening Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005; 13: 741-747. (Pubitemid 38737861)
9. Curry SJ, Emmons KM. Theoretical models for predicting and improving compliance with breast cancer screening. Ann Behav Med. 1994; 16: 302-316.
10. Rakowski WA, Dube CA, Marcus BH, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Abrams DB. Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography. Health Psychol. 1992; 11: 111-118.
11. Rakowski WA, Fulton JP, Feldman JP. Women's decision making about mammography: a replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol. 1993; 12: 209-214.
12. Taplin SH, Montano DE. Attitudes, age, and participation in mammographic screening: A prospective analysis. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1993; 6: 13-23.
13. Abraham C, Sheeran P. The health belief model. In: Conner M, Norman P, eds. Predicting Health Behavior. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press; 2005: 28-80.
14. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1980.
15. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
16. Champion VL, Skinner CS. The Health Belief Model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008: 45-65.
17. Tiro JA, Diamond P, Perz CA, et al. Validation of scales measuring attitudes and norms related to mammography screening. Health Psychol. 2005; 24: 555-566. (Pubitemid 41698164)
18. Becker MH, Haefner DP, Kasl SV, Kirscht JP, Maiman LA, Rosenstock IM. Selected psychosocial models and correlates of individual health-related behaviors. Med Care. 1977; 15: 27-46. (Pubitemid 8119395)
19. King JB. The impact of patients perceptions of high blood pressure on attendance at screening: An extension of the Health Belief Model. Soc Sci Med. 1982; 16: 1079-1091. (Pubitemid 12015637)
20. Calnan M. The health belief model and participation in programmes for the early detection of breast cancer: A comparative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1984; 19: 823-830.
21. Norman P, Conner M. Predicting and changing health behavior: future directions. In: Conner M, Norman P, eds. Predicting Health Behavior. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press; 2005: 324-372.
22. Trafimow D. Attitudinal and normative processes in health behaviour. In: Norman P, Abraham C, Conner M, eds. Understanding and Changing Health Behaviour: From Health Beliefs to Self-regulation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2000: 101-113.
23. Mattson M. Towards a reconceptualization of communication cues to action in the health belief model: HIV test counselling. Commun Monogr. 1999; 66: 240-265.
24. Becker MH, Maiman LA. Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations. Med Care. 1975; 13: 10-24.
25. del Junco DJ, Vernon SW, Coan SP, et al. Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 333-346. (Pubitemid 351480528)
26. Vernon SW, del Junco DJ, Tiro JA, et al. Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 347-358. (Pubitemid 351480527)
27. Rakowski WA, Andersen MR, Stoddard AM, et al. Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography. Health Psychol. 1997; 16: 433-441. (Pubitemid 127465505)
28. Vernon SW, Myers RE, Tilley BC. Development and validation of an instrument to measure factors related to colorectal cancer screening adherence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 1997; 6: 825-832. (Pubitemid 27435482)
29. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus Version 7.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2012.
30. Yu C-Y. Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles; 2002.
31. Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. On desirability of parsimony in structural equation model selection. Struct Equ Model. 1999; 6: 292-300.
32. Satorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika. 2001; 66: 507-514. (Pubitemid 33570084)
33. Bryant FB, Satorra A. Principles and practice of scaled difference chi-square testing. Struct Equ Model. 2012; 19: 372-398.
34. Satorra A, Bentler PM. Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika. 2010; 75: 243-248.
35. Cook T, Flay BR. The temporal persistance of experimentally induced attitude change: an evaluative review. In: Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic; 1978: 1-57.
36. Hu LH, Bentler PM. Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle RH, ed. Structural Equation Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
37. Hu LH, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999; 6: 1-55.
38. Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol. 1988; 7: 355-386.
39. Baumann LJ, Fontana SA, Brown RL, Cameron L. Testing a model of mammography intention. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1993; 23: 1733-1756.
40. Lauver D, Nabholz S, Scott K, Tak Y. Testing theoretical explanations of mammography use. Nurs Res. 1997; 46: 32-39. (Pubitemid 127457115)
41. Montaño DE, Thompson B, Taylor VM, Mahloch J. Understanding mammography intention and utilization among women in an inner city public hospital clinic. Prev Med. 1997; 26: 817-824. (Pubitemid 27508655)
42. Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, Costanza ME, Greene HL. Breast cancer screening by mammography: Utilization and associated factors. Am J Public Health. 1989; 79: 1499-1502. (Pubitemid 19270293)
43. Burns RB, Freund KM, Ash A, Shwartz M, Antab L, Hall R. Who gets repeat screening mammography: The role of the physician. J Gen Intern Med. 1995; 10: 520-522.
44. Halabi S, Skinner CS, Samsa GP, Strigo TS, Crawford YS, Rimer BK. Factors associated with repeat mammography screening. J Fam Pract. 2000; 49: 1104-1112. (Pubitemid 32003444)
45. Howe HL. Repeat mammography among women over 50 years of age. Am J Prev Med. 1992; 8: 182-185. (Pubitemid 23051999)
46. Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C, Lewis R, Sowden A, Kleijnen J. The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: A systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2000; 4: 1-133.
47. Lerman CL, Rimer BK, Trock BJ, Balshem AM, Engstrom PF. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med. 1990; 19: 279-290. (Pubitemid 20223115)
48. Lipkus IM, Rimer BK, Halabi S, Strigo TS. Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women? Am J Prev Med. 2000; 18: 1-10. (Pubitemid 30047171)
49. Mayne L, Earp JA. Initial and repeat mammography screening: Different behaviors/different predictors. J Rural Heal. 2003; 19: 63-71. (Pubitemid 36143055)
50. Rimer BK, Lerman CL, Trock BJ, King ES, Engstrom PF. Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med. 1991; 7: 69-74.
51. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50: 179-211.
52. Department of Veteran Affairs. 2001 National Survey of Veterans (NSV): final report. Available at http://www1.va.gov/vetdata/page.cfm?pg=5. Accessibility verified February 13, 2007.
53. Weinstein ND. Misleading tests of health behavior theories. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 33: 1-10.
54. Nigg CR, Allegrante JP, Ory M. Theory-comparison and multiple-behavior research: Common themes advancing health behavior research. Health Educ Res. 2002; 17: 670-679. (Pubitemid 35178096)