Leachate water quality of soils amended with different swine manure-based amendments

Chemosphere

Volumn 142, Issue , 2016, Pages 92-99

  Ro, K S ^a   Novak, J M ^a   Johnson, M G ^b   Szogi, A A ^a   Libra, J A ^c   Spokas, K A ^d   Bae, S ^e  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^c LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING AND BIOECONOMY ATB   (Germany)

^d AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^e Seoul Women University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Hydrochar; Leachate water quality; Soil amendment; Soil fertility; Swine manure

Indexed keywords

COMPOSTING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUTROPHICATION; FERTILIZERS; LEACHING; MANURES; NUTRIENTS; SURFACE ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY;

HYDROCHAR; LEACHATE WATER; SOIL AMENDMENT; SOIL FERTILITY; SWINE MANURE;

SOILS;

CARBON; NITRATE; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; POTASSIUM; MANURE; SOIL; WATER POLLUTANT;

ADSORPTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); LEACHATE; MANURE; NUTRIENT; SOIL AMENDMENT; SOIL CHEMISTRY; SOIL FERTILITY; WATER QUALITY;

ARTICLE; CATION EXCHANGE; LEACHING; MANURE; PH MEASUREMENT; SOIL AMENDMENT; SOIL FERTILITY; WATER QUALITY; ADSORPTION; ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; PIG; RECYCLING; SOIL; WATER POLLUTANT;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

ADSORPTION; ANIMALS; MANURE; RECYCLING; SOIL; SWINE; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 84946489924     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.023     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abel S., Peters A., Trinks S., Schonsky H., Facklam M., Wessolek G. Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 2013, 202-203:183-191.
2. Antal M.J., Gronli M. The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42:1619-1640.
3. APHA, AWWA, WEF, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington, D.C.
4. ASTM, 2006. Petroleum Products, Lubricants, and Fossil Fuels: Gaseous Fuels, Coal, and Coke. ASTM International, W. Conshohocken, PA.
5. ASTM, 2009. Testing Method for Determination of Dissolved Alkali and Alkaline Earth Cations and Ammonium in Water and Wastewater by Ion Chromatography. ASTM Standard D6919-09. Annual Book of Standards, Vo 11.02.
6. ASTM, 2011. Test Method for Anions in Water by Chemically Suppressed Ion Chromatography. ASTM Standard D4327-11. Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.01.
7. Bargmann I., Rillig M.C., Kruse A., Greel J.-M., Kucke M. Effects of hydrochar application on the dynamics of soluble nitrogen in soils and on plant availability. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2014, 177:48-59.
8. Berge N.D., Ro K.S., Mao J.D., Flore J.R.V., Chappell M.A., Bae S. Hydrothermal carbonization of municipal waste streams. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:5696-5703.
9. Berge N.D., Kammann C., Ro K.S., Libra J.A. Environmental Applications of Hydrothermal Carbonization Technology: Biochar Production, Carbon Sequestration, and Waste Conversion 2013, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Susses, UK.
10. Busscher W.J., Novak J.M., Caesar-TonThat T.C. Organic matter and polyacrylamide amendment of Norfolk loamy sand. Soil & Tillage Res. 2007, 93:171-178.
11. Cantrell, K.B., Martin II, J.H., Ro, K.S., 2010. Application of thermogravimetric analysis for the proximate analysis of livestock wastes. J. ASTM Int. 7, Paper ID JAI102583.
12. Cantrell K., Hunt P.G., Uchimiya M., Novak J.M., Ro K.S. Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 107:419-428.
13. Cao X., Ro K.S., Chappell M., Li Y., Mao J. Chemical structures of swine-manure chars produced under different carbonization conditions investigated by advanced solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Energy Fuels 2011, 25:388-397.
14. Cao X., Ro K.S., Libra J.A., Kammann C., Lima I.M., Berge N.D., Li L., Li Y., Chen N., Yang J., Deng B., Mao J. Effects of biomass types and carbonization conditions on the chemical characteristics of hydrochars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61:9401-9411.
15. Chan K.Y., Van Zwietern L., Meszaros I., Downie A., Joseph S. Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Austr. J. Soil Res. 2008, 46:437-444.
16. DeSutter T.M., Ham J.M. Lagoon-biogas emissions and carbon balance estimates of a swine production facility. J. Environ. Qual. 2005, 34:198-206.
17. Gajic A., Koch H.-J. Sugar beet (Beta vulagris L.) growth reduction caused by hydrochar is related to nitrogen supply. J. Envion. Qual. 2012, 41:1067-1075.
18. Gaskin J.W., Steiner C., Harris K., Das K.C., Bibens B. Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans. ASABE 2008, 51:2061-2069.
19. Gerba C.P., Smith J.E. Sources of pathogenic microorganisms and their fate during land application of wastes. J. Environ. Qual. 2005, 34:42-48.
20. He B., Zhang Y., Funk T., Riskowski G., Yin Y. Thermochemical conversion of swine manure: an alternative process for waste treatment and renewable energy production. Trans. ASAE 2000, 43:1827-1834.
21. Jeffery S., Verheijen F.G.A., van der Velde M., Bastos A.C. A quantitative review of effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 144:175-187.
22. Joseph S., Graber E.R., Chia C., Munroe P., Donne S., THomas T., Nielson S., Marjo C., Rutlidge H., Pan G.X., Li L., Taylor P., Rawal A., Hook J. Shifting paradigms: development of high-efficiency biochar fertilizers based on nano-structures and soluble components. Caron Manage. 2013, 4:323-343.
23. Josepth S.D., Camps-Arbestain M., Lin Y., Munroe P., Chia C.H., Hook J., van Zwietern L., Kimber S., Cowie A., Singh B.P., Lehmann J., Foidl N., Smernik R.J., Amonette J.E. An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2010, 48:501-515.
24. Kaplan D.L., Summer M.E., Bertsch P.M., Adriano D.C. Chemical conditions conductive to the release of mobile colloids from Ultisol profiles. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1995, 60:269-274.
25. Lehmann J.A. A handful of carbon. Nature 2007, 447:143-144.
26. Libra J.A., Ro K.S., Kammann C., Funke A., Berge N.D., Neubauer Y., Titirici M.M., Fuhner C., Bens O., Kern J., Emmerich K.-H. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2011, 2:71-106.
27. Novak J.M., Cantrell K.B., Watts D.W. Compositional and thermal evaluation of lignocellulosic and poultry litter chars via high and low temperature pyrolysis. Bioenergy Res. 2012, 6:114-130.
28. Novak J.M., Spokas K.A., Cantrell K., Ro K.S., Watts D.W., Glaz B., Busscher W.J., Hunt P.G. Effects of biochars and hydrochars produced from lignocellulosic and animal manure on fertility of a Mollisol and Entisol. Soil Use Manage. 2014, 30:175-181.
29. Pham M., Schideman L., Sharma B.K., Zhang Y., Chen W.-T. Effects of hydrothermal liquefaction on the fate of bioactive contaminants in manure and algal feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 149:126-135.
30. Rabotyagov S.S., Kling C.L., Gassman P.W., Rabalais N.N., Turner R.E. The economics of dead zones: causes, impacts, policy challenges, and a model of the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2014, 8:58-79.
31. Ro K.S., Cantrell K.B., Hunt P.G. High-temperature pyrolysis of blended animal manures for producing renewable energy and value-added biochar. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:10125-10131.
32. Ro K.S., Hunt P.G., Jackson M.A., Compton D.L., Yates S.R., Cantrell K., Chang S.C. Co-pyrolysis of swine manure with agricultural plastic waste: laboratory-scale study. Waste Manage. 2014, 34:1520-1528.
33. Sheth A.C., Bagchi B. Investigation of nitrogen-bearing species in catalytic steam gasification of poultry litter. J. Air Wastes Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55:619-628.
34. Singh, K., Risse, M., Worley, J., Das, K.C., Thompson, S., 2007. Adding value to poulty litter using fractionation, pyrolysis, and pelleting. ASABE Paper 074064.
35. Solomon D., Lehmann J., Wang J., Kinyangi J., Heymann K., Lu Y., Wirck S., Johnson C. Micro- and nano-environments of C sequestration in soil: a multi-elemental STXM-NEXAFS assessment of a black C and organomineral associations. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 438:372-388.
36. Spokas K.A., Novak J.M., Stewart C.E., Cantrell K., Uchimiya M., DiSaire M.G., Ro K.S. Qualitative analysis of volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere 2011, 85:869-882.
37. Stone K.C., Hunt P.G., Humenik F.J., Johnson M.H. Impact of swine waste application on ground and stream water quality in an eastern coastal plain watershed. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 1998, 41:1665-1670.
38. Uzoma K.C., Inoue M., Andry H., Fujimaki H., Zahoor A., Nishihara E. Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition. Soil Use Manage. 2011, 27:205-212.
39. Xue Y., Gao B., Yao Y., Inyang M., Zhang M., Zimmerman A.R., Ro K.S. Hydrogen peroxide modification enhances the ability of biochar (hydrochar) produced from hydrothermal carbonization of peanut hull to remove aqueous heavy metals: batch and column tests. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 200-202:673-680.