On flipping first-semester calculus: A case study

International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 573-582

  Petrillo, Joseph ^a  

^a ALFRED UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

active learning; calculus; failure rates; flipped classroom; video; WeBWorK

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946433793     PISSN: 0020739X     EISSN: 14645211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2015.1106014     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. S.Lord, M.Camacho. Effective teaching practices: preliminary analysis of engineering educators. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference; 2007 Oct 10–13; Milwaukee, WI.
2. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Building a science, technology, engineering and math education agenda; an update of state actions. Washington (DC): NGA Center for Best Practices; 2012.
3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [Internet]. Paris: PISA [cited 2015 May 26]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/.
4. R.Borba. Math failure rate high [Internet]. Fresno: The Collegian, California State University [revised 2005 Oct 3; cited 2015 Sept 8]. Available from: http://collegian.csufresno.edu/archive/2005/10/03/news/math.shtml.
5. M.Robinson Student enrollment in high school AP sequences and calculus: how does it correlate with STEM careers? B Sci Technol Soc. 2003;23:265–273.
6. D.F.Whalen, M.C.Shelley. Academic success for STEM and non-STEM majors. J STEM Educ Innov Res. 2010;11:45–60.
7. D.Budny, W.LeBold, G.Bjedov. Assessment of the impact of freshman engineering courses. J Eng Educ. 1998;87:405–411.
8. B.Cipra. Calculus reform sparks a backlash. Science. 1996;271:901–902.
9. B.Love, A.Hodge, N.Grandgenett, Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2014;45:317–324.
10. V.Jungic, H.Kaur, J.Mulholland, On flipping the classroom in large first year calculus courses. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2015;46:508–520.
11. J.Bergman, A.Sams. Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. Eugene (OR): International Society for Technology in Education; 2012.
12. C.H.Crouch, E.Mazur. Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. Am J Phys. 2001;69:970–977.
13. M.J.Lage, G.Platt, M.Treglia. Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. L Econ Educ. 2000;31:30–43.
14. E.Mazur. Peer instruction: a user's manual. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Addison-Wesley; 1996.
15. G.Novak, A.Gavrin, W.Christian, Just-in-time teaching: blending active learning with web technology. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Addison-Wesley; 1999.
16. M.Moravec, A.Williams, N.Aguilar-Roca, Learn before lecture: a strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010;9:473–481.
17. L.Deslauriers, E.Schelew, C.Wieman. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science. 2011;332:862–864.
18. M.K.Smith, W.B.Wood K.Krauter, Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011;10:55–63.
19. WeBWorK Homepage [Internet]. Washington (DC): The Mathematical Association of America [cited 2015 May 26]. Available from: http://webwork.maa.org/index.html.