The genetic sex-determination system predicts adult sex ratios in tetrapods

Nature

Volumn 527, Issue 7576, 2015, Pages 91-94

  Pipoly, Ivett ^a   Bókony, Veronika ^a,b   Kirkpatrick, Mark ^c   Donald, Paul F ^d,e   Székely, Tamás ^f   Liker, András ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PANNONIA   (Hungary)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^d RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^f Claverton Down   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; DATA SET; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; REPTILE; SEX DETERMINATION; SEX RATIO; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TAXONOMY;

ADULT; ADULT SEX RATIO; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; BODY SIZE LATITUDE; BREEDING; BREEDING LATITUDE; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC SEX DETERMINATION; GENETICS; HEREDITY; LATITUDE; MALE; MATING SUCCESS; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX CHROMOSOME; SEX DETERMINATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL SELECTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SURVIVAL; TETRAPOD; AMPHIBIA; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; MAMMAL; MEIOSIS; MUTATION; REPTILE; SEX DETERMINATION PROCESS;

AMPHIBIA; REPTILIA; TETRAPODA;

AMPHIBIANS; ANIMALS; BIRDS; FEMALE; MALE; MAMMALS; MEIOSIS; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; REPTILES; SEX CHROMOSOMES; SEX DETERMINATION PROCESSES; SEX RATIO;

EID: 84946233318     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature15380     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Kokko, H. & Jennions, M. D. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 919-948 (2008).
2. Le Galliard, J.-F., Fitze, P. S., Ferrière, R. &Clobert, J. Sex ratio bias, male aggression, and population collapse in lizards. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18231-18236 (2005).
3. Liker, A., Freckleton, R. P. &Székely, T. The evolutionof sex roles inbirds is related to adult sex ratio. Nature Commun. 4, 1587 (2013).
4. Székely, T., Weissing, F. J. & Komdeur, J. Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding system evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 1500-1512 (2014).
5. Donald, P. F. Adult sex ratios in wild bird populations. Ibis 149, 671-692 (2007).
6. Trivers, R. L. in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Men (ed. Cambell, B.) 136-179 (Aldine, 1972).
7. Cockburn, A., Scott, M. P. & Dickman, C. R. Sex ratio and intrasexual kin competition in mammals. Oecologia 66, 427-429 (1985).
8. Székely, T., Liker, A., Freckleton, R. P., Fichtel, C. & Kappeler, P. M. Sex-biased survival predicts adult sex ratio variation in wild birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140342 (2014).
9. Bessa-Gomes, C., Legendre, S. & Clobert, J. Allee effects, mating systems and the extinction risk in populations with two sexes. Ecol. Lett. 7, 802-812 (2004).
10. Liker, A., Freckleton, R. P. & Székely, T. Divorce and infidelity are associated with skewed adult sex ratios in birds. Curr. Biol. 24, 880-884 (2014).
11. Griskevicius, V. et al. The financial consequences of toomanymen: sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 69-80 (2012).
12. Schacht, R., Rauch, K. L. & Borgerhoff Mulder, M. Too many men: The violence problem? Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 214-222 (2014).
13. Wilson, E. O. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Harvard Univ. Press, 1975).
14. Haldane, J. B. Sex-ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12, 101-109 (1922).
15. Burt, A. & Trivers, R. Genes in Conflict: The Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements (Harvard Univ. Press, 2008).
16. Liker, A. &Székely, T. Mortality costs of sexual selectionandparental care innatural populations of birds. Evolution 59, 890-897 (2005).
17. Bachtrog, D. et al. Sex determination: why somany ways of doing it? PLoS Biol. 12, e1001899 (2014).
18. Pagel, M. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 26, 331-348 (1997).
19. Pagel, M. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: A generalmethod for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255, 37-45 (1994).
20. Morrison, C. & Hero, J.-M. Geographic variation in life-history characteristics of amphibians: A review. J. Anim. Ecol. 72, 270-279 (2003).
21. Adkins-Regan, E. & Reeve, H. K. Sexual dimorphism in body size and the origin of sex-determination systems. Am. Nat. 183, 519-536 (2014).
22. Qi, Y., Yang, W., Lu, B. & Fu, J. Genetic evidence for male-biased dispersal in the Qinghai toad-headed agamid Phrynocephalus vlangalii and its potential link to individual social interactions. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1219-1230 (2013).
23. Bachtrog, D. A dynamic view of sex chromosome evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 578-585 (2006).
24. Mank, J. E. Sex chromosome dosage compensation: definitely not for everyone. Trends Genet. 29, 677-683 (2013).
25. Jaenike, J. Sex chromosomemeiotic drive. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 25-49 (2001).
26. Werren, J. H. & Beukeboom, L. W. Sex determination, sex ratios, and genetic conflict. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 29, 233-261 (1998).
27. Field, D. L., Pickup, M. &Barrett, S. C. H. Comparative analyses of sex-ratio variation in dioecious flowering plants. Evolution 67, 661-672 (2013).
28. Hough, J., Immler, S., Barrett, S. C. H. & Otto, S. P. Evolutionarily stable sex ratios and mutation load. Evolution 67, 1915-1925 (2013).
29. Roberts, R. B., Ser, J. R. & Kocher, T. D. Sexual conflict resolved by invasion of a novel sex determiner in Lake Malawi Cichlid fishes. Science 326, 998-1001 (2009).
30. van Doorn, G. S. & Kirkpatrick, M. Transitions between male and female heterogamety caused by sex-antagonistic selection. Genetics 186, 629-645 (2010).
31. Evans, B. J., Pyron, R. A. &Wiens, J. J. in Polyploidy and Genome Evolution (eds Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E.) 385-410 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012).
32. Jongepier, E. Reptilian Adult Sex Ratios are Biased Towards the Homogametic Sex. Masters thesis, Univ. Groningen (2011).
33. Arendt, J. D., Reznick, D. N. &López-Sepulcre, A. Replicated origin of female-biased adult sex ratio in introduced populations of the Trinidadian Guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 68, 2343-2356 (2014).
34. The Tree of Sex Consortium. Tree of Sex: A database of sexual systems. Sci. Data 1, 140015 (2014).
35. Miura, I., Ohtani, H. & Ogata, M. Independent degeneration of W and Y sex chromosomes in frog Rana rugosa. Chromosome Res. 20, 47-55 (2012).
36. Sarre, S. D., Ezaz, T. & Georges, A. Transitions between sex-determining systemsin reptiles and amphibians. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 12, 391-406 (2011).
37. Pokorná, M. & Kratochv?l, L. Phylogeny of sex-determining mechanisms in squamate reptiles: Are sex chromosomes an evolutionary trap? Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 156, 168-183 (2009).
38. Freckleton, R. P., Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: A test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160, 712-726 (2002).
39. Lislevand, T., Figuerola, J. & Székely, T. Avian body sizes in relation to fecundity, mating system, display behaviour and resource sharing. Ecology 88, 1605 (2007).
40. Du, W., Robbins, T. R., Warner, D. A., Langkilde, T. & Shine, R. Latitudinal and seasonal variation in reproductive effort of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus). Integr. Zool. 9, 360-371 (2014).
41. Iverson, J. B., Balgooyen, C. P., Byrd, K. K. &Lyddan, K. K. Latitudinal variation in egg and clutch size in turtles. Can. J. Zool. 71, 2448-2461 (1993).
42. Jones, K. E. et al. PanTHERIA: A species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology 90, 2648 (2009).
43. Healy, K. et al. Ecology and mode of life explain lifespan variation in birds and mammals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 281, 20140298 (2014).
44. Lessells, C. M. & Boag, P. T. Unrepeatable repeatabilities? A common mistake. Auk 104, 116-121 (1987).
45. Pyron, R. A. & Wiens, J. J. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 61, 543-583 (2011).
46. Gardner, M. G., Hugall, A. F., Donnellan, S. C., Hutchinson, M. N. & Foster, R. Molecular systematics of social skinks: phylogeny and taxonomy of the Egernia group (Reptilia: Scincidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 154, 781-794 (2008).
47. Pyron, R. A., Burbrink, F. T. & Wiens, J. J. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evol. Biol. 13, 93 (2013).
48. Guillon, J.-M., Guery, L., Hulin, V. & Girondot, M. A large phylogeny of turtles (Testudines) using molecular data. Contrib. Zool. 81, 147-158 (2012).
49. Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444-448 (2012).
50. Meredith, R. W. et al. Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334, 521-524 (2011).
51. Fritz, S. A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. & Purvis, A. Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk: big is bad, but only in the tropics. Ecol. Lett. 12, 538-549 (2009).
52. Chiari, Y., Cahais, V., Galtier, N. & Delsuc, F. Phylogenomic analyses support the position of turtles as the sister group of birds and crocodiles (Archosauria). BMC Biol. 10, 65 (2012).
53. Amemiya, C. T. et al. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496, 311-316 (2013).
54. Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. http://mesquiteproject. org (2011).
55. Pagel, M. & Meade, A. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jumpMarkov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167, 808-825 (2006).
56. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing http://www. R-project. org (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008).
57. Orme, A. D. et al. caper: Comparative Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R (v. 0. 5) https://cran. r-project. org/web/packages/caper/index. html (2013).