Corrigendum: Allelic variation contributes to bacterial host specificity (Nature Communications (2015) 6 (8754) DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9754);Allelic variation contributes to bacterial host specificity

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Yue, Min ^a   Han, Xiangan ^a,k   Masi, Leon De ^a   Zhu, Chunhong ^a,k   Ma, Xun ^a,l   Zhang, Junjie ^a,m   Wu, Renwei ^a,n   Schmieder, Robert ^b,o   Kaushik, Radhey S ^c   Fraser, George P ^d   Zhao, Shaohua ^e   McDermott, Patrick F ^e   Weill, François Xavier ^f   Mainil, Jacques G ^g   Arze, Cesar ^h   Fricke, W Florian ^h,p   Edwards, Robert A ^b,i   Brisson, Dustin ^a   Zhang, Nancy R ^j   Rankin, Shelley C ^a   Schifferli, Dieter M ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

^e CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^f INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^g UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^k INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^l SHIHEZI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^m ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY OF LIGHT INDUSTRY   (China)

ⁿ The Key Laboratory of Plant Pathology of Hubei Province   (China)

^o ILLUMINA INC   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM; COLONIZATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; HOST SPECIFICITY; INFECTIOUS DISEASE; MUTATION; PATHOGEN; PROTEIN;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); SALMONELLA ENTERICA SUBSP. ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM;

ADHESIN; BACTERIAL PROTEIN;

ALLELE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL SALMONELLOSIS; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; FIMBRIA; FOOD CONTROL; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; HOST RANGE; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM; SALMONELLOSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ADHESINS, BACTERIAL; ALLELES; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; FIMBRIAE, BACTERIAL; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; HOST SPECIFICITY; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM;

EID: 84946138606     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15229     Document Type: Erratum

References (61)

1. Shi, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, W., Qi, J. & Gao, G. F. Enabling the host jump: structural determinants of receptor-binding specificity in influenza A viruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 822-831 (2014).
2. de Graaf, M. & Fouchier, R. A. Role of receptor binding specificity in influenza A virus transmission and pathogenesis. EMBO J. 33, 823-841 (2014).
3. Spano, S. & Galan, J. E. A Rab32-dependent pathway contributes to Salmonella typhi host restriction. Science 338, 960-963 (2012).
4. Chaudhuri, R. R. et al. Comprehensive assignment of roles for Salmonella typhimurium genes in intestinal colonization of food-producing animals. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003456 (2013).
5. Deng, L. et al. Host adaptation of a bacterial toxin from the human pathogen Salmonella Typhi. Cell 159, 1290-1299 (2014).
6. Mather, A. E. et al. Distinguishable epidemics of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 in different hosts. Science 341, 1514-1517 (2013).
7. McClelland, M. et al. Comparison of genome degradation in Paratyphi A and Typhi, human-restricted serovars of Salmonella enterica that cause typhoid. Nat. Genet. 36, 1268-1274 (2004).
8. Langridge, G. C. et al. Patterns of genome evolution that have accompanied host adaptation in Salmonella. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 863-868 (2015).
9. Viana, D. et al. A single natural nucleotide mutation alters bacterial pathogen host tropism. Nat. Genet. 47, 361-366 (2015).
10. Yue, M. & Schifferli, D. M. Allelic variation in Salmonella: an underappreciated driver of adaptation and virulence. Front. Microbiol. 4, 419 (2014).
11. Kingsley, R. A. et al. Genome and transcriptome adaptation accompanying emergence of the definitive type 2 host-restricted Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium pathovar. MBio 4, e00565-13 (2013).
12. Okoro, C. K. et al. Intracontinental spread of human invasive Salmonella Typhimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Genet. 44, 1215-1221 (2012).
13. Parsons, B. N. et al. Invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella typhimurium ST313 are not host-restricted and have an invasive phenotype in experimentally infected chickens. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7, e2487 (2013).
14. Yue, M. et al. Combined with pyrosequencing for identification of allelic variants with phenotypic associations among targeted Salmonella Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 7480-7482 (2012).
15. Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis in Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn, 301-330 (Springer, 2002).
16. OReilly, P. F. et al. MultiPhen: joint model of multiple phenotypes can increase discovery in GWAS. PLoS ONE 7, e34861 (2012).
17. Guo, A. et al. FimH alleles direct preferential binding of Salmonella to distinct mammalian cells or to avian cells. Microbiology 155, 1623-1633 (2009).
18. Grzymajlo, K. et al. FimH adhesinrom host unrestricted Salmonella Enteritidis binds to different glycoprotein ligands expressed by enterocytes from sheep, pig and cattle than FimH adhesins from host restricted Salmonella Abortus-ovis, Salmonella Choleraesuis and Salmonella Dublin. Vet. Microbiol. 166, 550-557 (2013).
19. Soyer, Y., Orsi, R. H., Rodriguez-Rivera, L. D., Sun, Q. & Wiedmann, M. Genome wide evolutionary analyses reveal serotype specific patterns of positive selection in selected Salmonella serotypes. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 264 (2009).
20. Kisiela, D. I. et al. Allosteric catch bond properties of the FimH adhesin from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 38136-38147 (2011).
21. Yue, M. et al. Diversification of the Salmonella fimbriae: a model of macro-and microevolution. PLoS ONE 7, e38596 (2012).
22. Kisiela, D. et al. Characterization of FimH adhesins expressed by Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovars Gallinarum and Pullorum: reconstitution of mannose-binding properties by single amino acid substitution. Infect. Immun. 73, 6187-6190 (2005).
23. Waltman, D. & Sellers, R. in Report of the Committee on Salmonella, Proceedings 117th Annual Meeting of the United States Animal Health Association, 328-338 (USAHA, Saint Joseph, MO, 2013).
24. Tsolis, R. M. et al. Identification of a putative Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium host range factor with homology to IpaH and YopM by signature-tagged mutagenesis. Infect. Immun. 67, 6385-6393 (1999).
25. Barquist, L. et al. A comparison of dense transposon insertion libraries in the Salmonella serovars Typhi and Typhimurium. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 4549-4564 (2013).
26. Karlsson, K.-A., Angstrom, J., Bergstrom, J. & Lanne, B. Microbial interaction with animal cell surface carbohydrates. APMIS 100, 71-83 (1992).
27. Boddicker, J. D., Ledeboer, N. A., Jagnow, J., Jones, B. D. & Clegg, S. Differential binding to and biofilm formation on, HEp-2 cells by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is dependent upon allelic variation in the fimH gene of the fim gene cluster. Mol. Microbiol. 45, 1255-1265 (2002).
28. Dwyer, B. E., Newton, K. L., Kisiela, D., Sokurenko, E. V. & Clegg, S. Single nucleotide polypmorphisms of fimH associated with adherence and biofilm formation by serovars of Salmonella enterica. Microbiology 157, 3162-3171 (2011).
29. Kisiela, D. I. et al. Evolution of Salmonella enterica virulence via point mutations in the fimbrial adhesin. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002733 (2012).
30. Misselwitz, B. et al. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium binds to HeLa cells via Fim-mediated reversible adhesion and irreversible type three secretion system 1-mediated docking. Infect. Immun. 79, 330-341 (2011).
31. Grzymajlo, K., Kuzminska-Bajor, M., Jaworski, J., Dobryszycki, P. & Ugorski, M. The high-adhesive properties of the FimH adhesin of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis are determined by a single F118S substitution. Microbiology 156, 1738-1748 (2010).
32. Kuzminska-Bajor, M. et al. Decreased colonization of chicks by Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum expressing mannose-sensitive FimH adhesin from Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Vet. Microbiol. 158, 205-210 (2012).
33. Wilson, R. L., Elthon, J., Clegg, S. & Jones, B. D. Salmonella enterica serovars Gallinarum and Pullorum expressing Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium type 1 fimbriae exhibit increased invasiveness for mammalian cells. Infect. Immun. 68, 4782-4785 (2000).
34. Sokurenko, E. V., Vogel, V. & Thomas, W. E. Catch-bond mechanism of forceenhanced adhesion: counterintuitive, elusive, but widespread? Cell Host Microbe 4, 314-323 (2008).
35. Aprikian, P. et al. Interdomain interaction in the FimH adhesin of Escherichia coli regulates the affinity to mannose. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 23437-23446 (2007).
36. Grimont, P. A. D. & Weill, F.-X. Antigenic Formulae of the Salmonella Serovars 9th edn (WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Salmonella, 2007).
37. Liu, F. et al. Subtyping Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis isolates from different sources by using sequence typing based on virulence genes and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 4520-4526 (2011).
38. Liu, F. et al. Novel virulence gene and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) multilocus sequence typing scheme for subtyping of the major serovars of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 1946-1956 (2011).
39. Dimarzio, M., Shariat, N., Kariyawasam, S., Barrangou, R. & Dudley, E. G. Antibiotic resistance in Salmonella Typhimurium associates with CRISPR sequence type. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 4282-4289 (2013).
40. Shariat, N. et al. Subtyping of Salmonella enterica serovar Newport outbreak isolates by CRISPR-MVLST and determination of the relationship between CRISPR-MVLST and PFGE results. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 2328-2336 (2013).
41. Shariat, N. et al. The combination of CRISPR-MVLST and PFGE provides increased discriminatory power for differentiating human clinical isolates of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis. Food Microbiol. 34, 164-173 (2013).
42. Darling, A. E., Mau, B. & Perna, N. T. Progressive Mauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 5, e11147 (2010).
43. Overbeek, R. et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D206-D214 (2014).
44. Zhou, Y., Liang, Y., Lynch, K. H., Dennis, J. J. & Wishart, D. S. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W347-W352 (2011).
45. Angiuoli, S. V. et al. CloVR: a virtual machine for automated and portable sequence analysis from the desktop using cloud computing. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 356 (2011).
46. Song, J., Xu, Y., White, S., Miller, K. W. & Wolinsky, M. SNPsFinder-a webbased application for genome-wide discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in microbial genomes. Bioinformatics 21, 2083-2084 (2005).
47. Librado, P. & Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451-1452 (2009).
48. Borowsky, R. L. Estimating nucleotide diversity from random amplified polymorphic DNA and amplified fragment length polymorphism data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18, 143-148 (2001).
49. Delport, W., Poon, A. F., Frost, S. D. & Kosakovsky Pond, S. L. Datamonkey 2010: a suite of phylogenetic analysis tools for evolutionary biology. Bioinformatics 26, 2455-2457 (2010).
50. Jolley, K. A., Feil, E. J. & Chan, M. S. Maiden MC. Sequence type analysis and recombinational tests (START). Bioinformatics 17, 1230-1231 (2001).
51. Carrico, J. A. et al. Illustration of a common framework for relating multiple typing methods by application to macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 2524-2532 (2006).
52. Roy, A., Kucukural, A. & Zhang, Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 5, 725-738 (2010).
53. Wu, S. & Zhang, Y. LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 3375-3382 (2007).
54. Yang, J., Roy, A. & Zhang, Y. Protein-ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment. Bioinformatics 29, 2588-2595 (2013).
55. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33-38 27-38 (1996).
56. Blomfield, I. C., McClain, M. S. & Eisenstein, B. I. Type 1 fimbriae mutants of Escherichia coli K12: characterization of recognized afimbriate strains and construction of new fim deletion mutants. Mol. Microbiol. 5, 1439-1445 (1991).
57. Rhoads, J. M. et al. L-glutamine and L-asparagine stimulate Na -H exchange in porcine jejunal enterocytes. Am. J. Physiol. 266, G828-G838 (1994).
58. Gonzalez-Vallina, R. et al. Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein secretion by a newborn piglet intestinal cell line (IPEC-1). Am. J. Physiol. 271, G249-G259 (1996).
59. Rusu, D., Loret, S., Peulen, O., Mainil, J. & Dandrifosse, G. Immunochemical biomolecular and biochemical characterization of bovine epithelial intestinal primocultures. BMC Cell Biol. 6, 42 (2005).
60. Loret, S. et al. Preliminary characterization of jejunocyte and colonocyte cell lines isolated by enzymatic digestion from adult and young cattle. Res. Vet. Sci. 87, 123-132 (2009).
61. Perreault, N. & Beaulieu, J. F. Primary cultures of fully differentiated and pure human intestinal epithelial cells. Exp. Cell Res. 245, 34-42 (1998).