Microfluidic PCR combined with pyrosequencing for identification of allelic variants with phenotypic associations among targeted Salmonella genes

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 20, 2012, Pages 7480-7482

  Yue, Min ^a   Schmieder, Robert ^b   Edwards, Robert A ^b,c   Rankin, Shelley C ^a   Schifferli, Dieter M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIN; ALLELIC VARIANTS; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCES; GENETIC VARIATION; PARALLEL SEQUENCING; POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS; PYROSEQUENCING; SALMONELLA STRAINS;

GENES; MICROORGANISMS;

SALMONELLA;

ADHESIN; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BACTERIAL DNA;

ADHESION; ALLELE; BACTERIUM; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; PHENOTYPE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ALLELE; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG EFFECT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HOST RANGE; METHODOLOGY; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOLECULAR TYPING; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALMONELLA;

ADHESINS, BACTERIAL; ALLELES; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; DNA, BACTERIAL; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HOST SPECIFICITY; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MOLECULAR TYPING; PHENOTYPE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALMONELLA;

SALMONELLA;

EID: 84868356775     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01703-12     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allard MW, et al. 2012. High resolution clustering of Salmonella enterica serovar Montevideo strains using a next-generation sequencing approach. BMC Genomics 13:32. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-32.
2. Boddicker JD, Ledeboer NA, Jagnow J, Jones BD, Clegg S. 2002. Differential binding to and biofilm formation on, HEp-2 cells by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is dependent upon allelic variation in the fimH gene of the fim gene cluster. Mol. Microbiol. 45:1255-1265.
3. Brown AW, Rankin SC, Platt DJ. 2000. Detection and characterisation of integrons in Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 191:145-149.
4. Foley SL, Lynne AM. 2008. Food animal-associated Salmonella challenges: pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. J. Anim. Sci. 86:E173-E187.
5. Fricke WF, et al. 2011. Comparative genomics of 28 Salmonella enterica isolates: evidence for CRISPR-mediated adaptive sublineage evolution. J. Bacteriol. 193:3556-3568.
6. Garcia-Quintanilla M, Ramos-Morales F, Casadesus J. 2008. Conjugal transfer of the Salmonella enterica virulence plasmid in the mouse intestine. J. Bacteriol. 190:1922-1927.
7. Gerner-Smidt P, Whichard JM. 2010. Foodborne disease trends and reports. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 7:609-611.
8. Grzymajlo K, Kuzminska-Bajor M, Jaworski J, Dobryszycki P, Ugorski M. 2010. The high-adhesive properties of the FimH adhesin of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis are determined by a single F118S substitution. Microbiology 156:1738-1748.
9. Guglielmini J, Quintais L, Garcillan-Barcia MP, de la Cruz F, Rocha EP. 2011. The repertoire of ICE in prokaryotes underscores the unity, diversity, and ubiquity of conjugation. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002222. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002222.
10. Guo A, et al. 2009. FimH alleles direct preferential binding of Salmonella to distinct mammalian cells or to avian cells. Microbiology 155:1623-1633.
11. Kingsley RA, Baumler AJ. 2000. Host adaptation and the emergence of infectious disease: the Salmonella paradigm. Mol. Microbiol. 36:1006-1014.
12. Kisiela D, et al. 2006. Functional characterization of the FimH adhesin from Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Microbiology 152:1337-1346.
13. Lester CH, Frimodt-Moller N, Hammerum AM. 2004. Conjugal transfer of aminoglycoside and macrolide resistance between Enterococcus faecium isolates in the intestine of streptomycin-treated mice. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 235:385-391.
14. Nijsten R, London N, van den Bogaard A, Stobberingh E. 1995. In-vivo transfer of resistance plasmids in rat, human or pig-derived intestinal flora using a rat model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36:975-985.
15. Rankin SC, et al. 2002. Molecular characterization of cephalosporinresistant Salmonella enterica serotype Newport isolates from animals in Pennsylvania. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4679-4684.
16. Rowe-Magnus D, Mazel D. 2006. The evolution of antibiotic resistance, p 221-244. In Seifert HS, DiRita VJ (ed), Evolution of bacterial pathogens. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
17. Sangal V, et al. 2010. Evolution and population structure of Salmonella enterica serovar Newport. J. Bacteriol. 192:6465-6476.
18. Scallan E, et al. 2011. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States- major pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17:7-15.
19. Schikora A, et al. 2011. Conservation of Salmonella infection mechanisms in plants and animals. PLoS One 6:e24112. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0024112.
20. Soyer Y, Orsi RH, Rodriguez-Rivera LD, Sun Q, Wiedmann M. 2009. Genome wide evolutionary analyses reveal serotype specific patterns of positive selection in selected Salmonella serotypes. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:264.
21. Yue M, et al. 2012. Diversification of the Salmonella fimbriae: a model of macroand microevolution. PLoS One 7:e38596. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038596