Erratum: Accuracy of a tablet audiometer for measuring behavioral hearing thresholds in a clinical population (Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States) (2015) 153 (838-842) DOI: 10.1177/0194599815593737);Accuracy of a Tablet Audiometer for Measuring Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Clinical Population

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

Volumn 153, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 838-842

  Thompson, Gregory P ^a   Sladen, Douglas P ^a   Borst, Becky J Hughes ^a   Still, Owen L ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

audiometrics; automated; hearing thresholds; reliability

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETER; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; POPULATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOUND LEVEL METER; TABLET AUDIOMETER; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; ADOLESCENT; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84946088268     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599815623266     Document Type: Erratum

References (10)

1. American National Standards Institute. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. Rev ed. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute; 2003. ANSI S3.1-1999.
2. American National Standards Institute. Methods for Manual Pure-Tone Threshold Audiometry. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute; 2004. ANSI S3.21-2004.
3. American National Standards Institute. Specifications for Audiometers. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute; 2004. ANSI S3.6-2004.
4. Mahomed F, Swanepoel DW, Eikelboom RH, Soer M., Validity of automated threshold audiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [published online 31, 2013 ]. Ear Hear.
5. Yeung J, Javidia H, Heley S, et al. The new age of play audiometry: prospective validation testing of an iPad-based play audiometer. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 42: 21-28.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310.
7. Foulad A, Bui P, Djalilian H., Automated audiometry using Apple iOS-based application technology. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 149: 700-706.
8. Lemkens N, Vermeire K, Brokx JP, et al. Interpretation of pure-tone threshold in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL): a review of measurement variability and age-specific references. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2002; 56: 341-352.
9. Ho AT, Hildreth AJ, Lindsey L., Computer assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry. Am J Otol. 2009; 30: 876-883.
10. Storey KK, Munoz K, Nelson L, Larsen J, White K., Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment. Int J Audiol. 2014; 53: 730-736.