Automated audiometry using Apple iOS-based application technology

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

Volumn 149, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 700-706

  Foulad, Allen ^a   Bui, Peggy ^b   Djalilian, Hamid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

audiogram; audiometry; automated; hearing; iOS; iPad; iPhone; iPod; test

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY DEVICE; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; OPERATING SYSTEM BASED APPLICATION TECHNOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SCIENTIST; SOUND INTENSITY; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW;

AUDIOGRAM; AUDIOMETRY; AUTOMATED; HEARING; IOS; IPAD; IPHONE; IPOD; TEST;

AUDIOMETRY; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HEARING; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84887432743     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599813501461     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Jerlvall L, Dryselius H, Arlinger S. Comparison of manual and computer-controlled audiometry using identical procedures. Scand Audiol. 1983 ; 12: 209-213
2. Picard M, Ilecki HJ, Baxter JD. Clinical trial of BOBCAT: 1st report on the reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry [in French]. Audiology. 1988 ; 27: 234-246
3. Ho AT, Hildreth AJ, Lindsey L. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry. Otol Neurotol. 2009 ; 30: 876-883
4. Swanepoel D, Mngemane S, Molemong S, Mkwanazi H, Tutshini S. Hearing assessment - reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry. Telemed J E Health. 2010 ; 16: 557-563
5. Margolis RH, Saly GL, Le C, Laurence J. Qualind: A method for assessing the accuracy of automated tests. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007 ; 18: 78-89
6. Margolis RH, Frisina R, Walton JP. AMTAS(®): automated method for testing auditory sensitivity, II: air conduction audiograms in children and adults. Int J Audiol. 2011 ; 50: 434-439
7. Recommended procedures for pure-tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol. 1981 ; 15: 213-216
8. Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Sci. 2001 ; 16: 101-117
9. Lemkens N, Vermeire K, Brokx JP, et al. Interpretation of pure-tone thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL): a review of measurement variability and age-specific references. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2002 ; 56: 341-352
10. Van Tasell DJ, Folkeard P. Reliability and accuracy of a method of adjustment for self-measurement of auditory thresholds. Otol Neurotol. 2013 ; 34: 9-15