Seismic Fragility Functions for Sewerage Pipelines

Pipelines 2015: Recent Advances in Underground Pipeline Engineering and Construction - Proceedings of the Pipelines 2015 Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 291-303

  Liu, M ^a   Giovinazzi, S ^a   Lee, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; GEOPHYSICS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; POTABLE WATER; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMOLOGY; SEWERS; WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS; WATER PIPELINES;

EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCES; FRAGILITY CURVES; FRAGILITY FUNCTION; GROUND MOTION INTENSITIES; PEAK GROUND VELOCITY; PHYSICAL DAMAGES; PRESSURE PIPELINE; SEISMIC FRAGILITY;

PIPELINES;

EID: 84946034235     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/9780784479360.028     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Alexoudi, M., Pitilakis, K., Souli, A. (2010). Fragility functions for water and wastewater system elements, Deliverable D3.5 SYNER-G Project: Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
2. American Lifelines Alliance (ALA). (2001). Seismic fragility formulations for water systems Part 1 Guidelines. ASCE, Reston, VA.
3. American Lifelines Alliance (ALA). (2004). wastewater systems performance assessment guideline Part 1 Guidelines. ASCE, Reston, VA.
4. New Zealand Water & Wastewater Association. (2006). New Zealand Pipe Inspection Manual. Third edition.
5. Baker, J. W. (2014). Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra. 31:1, 579-599.
6. Christchurch City Council. (2011). Stronger Christchurch Infrastructure Rebuild Plan: How we plan to fix our earthquake damaged roads and underground services: December.
7. Cubrinovski, M., Bray, J. D, Taylor, M., Giorgini, S., Bradley, B., Wotherspoon, L., Zupan, J. (2011a). Soil liquefaction effects in the central business district during the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Seismological Research Letters, 82(6), 893-904.
8. Cubrinovski, M., Hughes, M.W., McCahon, I. (2011b). Liquefaction Resistance Index (Zoning) of Christchurch at water table depth based on liquefaction observations from the 2010-2011 earthquakes and water table depth information. December 2011. University of Canterbury.
9. Eidinger, J. M. (1998). Water distribution system. In A. J. Schiff (Ed.), The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989-Lifelines Performance of Built Environment-lifelines (pp.A63-A80). Washington: United States Geological Survey.
10. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1997). National Eearthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings.
11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2001). Earthquake loss estimation methodology HAZUS Service Release 5: technical manual, FEMA, Washington, DC. http://www.fema.gov/hazus
12. Forsyth, P., Barnell, D., Jongens, R. (2008) "Geology of the Christchurch Area, Scale 1:250000." Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Geological Map 16.
13. Giovinazzi, S., Wilson, T.M., Davis, C., Bristow, D., Gallagher, M., Schofield, A., Tang, A. (2011). Lifelines performance and management following the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, New Zealand: highlights of resilience. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.44(4): 402-417
14. Honegger, D.G., Eguchi, R.T. (1992). Determination of the relative vulnerabilities to Seismic damage for dan diego country water Authority (SDCWA) Water Transmission Pipelines. October, 1992.
15. Liu, M., Giovinazzi, S., MacGeorge, R., Beukman, P. (2013). Wastewater network restoration following the Canterbury, NZ earthquake sequence: Turning postearthquake recovery into resilience enhancement. Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Publications and Monographs No.38: International efforts in lifeline earthquake engineering. Published by ASCE. 160-167. ISBN 978-0-7844-1323-4.
16. Liu, M., Milke, M., Giovinazzi, S. (In review). Post-earthquake decision-making on sewer recovery and the roles of damage and repair data: insights from the Christchurch experience.
17. Nagata, S., Yamamoto, K., Ishida, H., Kusaka, A. (2011). Estimation of Fragility Curve of Sewerage Pipes due to Seismic Damaged Data. Procedia Engineering, 14, 1887-1896.
18. O'Rourke, M., Ayala, G. (1993). Pipeline damage due to wave propagation. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 119(9), 1490-1498.
19. O'Rourke, M., Liu, X. (1999). Response of buried pipelines subject to earthquake effects. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Monograph Series. No. 3.
20. O'Rourke, M., Jeon, S., Toprak, S., Cubrinovski, M., Hughes, M., Van Ballegooy, S., Bouziou, D. (2014). Earthquake Response of Underground Pipeline Networks in Christchurch, NZ. Earthquake Spectra, 30(1), 183-204.
21. Scawthorn, C., Miyajima, M., Ono, Y., Kiyono, J., Hamada, M. (2006). Lifeline aspects of the 2004 Niigata ken Chuetsu, Japan, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 22(S1), 89-110.
22. Schiff, A. J. (1995). Northridge earthquake: lifeline performance and post-earthquake response: ASCE Publications.
23. Shoji, G., Naba, S.m and Nagata, S. (2011). "Evaluation of seismic vulnerability of sewerage pipelines based on assessment of the damage data in the 1995 Kobe earthquake." Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering. London, ISBN 978-0-415-66986-3, 1415-1423.
24. Stronger Christchurch Infrastructure Rebuilding Team. (2014). The Christchurch wastewater network database. Derived on March 4, 2014.
25. Toprak, S., Taskin, F. (2007). Estimation of earthquake damage to buried pipelines caused by ground shaking. Natural hazards, 40(1), 1-24.