Bias correction of GCM precipitation by quantile mapping: How well do methods preserve changes in quantiles and extremes?

Journal of Climate

Volumn 28, Issue 17, 2015, Pages 6938-6959

  Cannon, Alex J ^a,b   Sobie, Stephen R ^a   Murdock, Trevor Q ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bias; Climate models; Extreme events; Precipitation; Statistical techniques; Trends

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL); RAIN;

ANNUAL PRECIPITATION; BIAS; COUPLED MODEL INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT; EXTREME EVENTS; GENERALIZED EXTREME VALUE; PRECIPITATION EXTREMES; STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES; TRENDS;

CLIMATE MODELS;

ALGORITHM; CLIMATE MODELING; ERROR CORRECTION; EXTREME EVENT; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; PRECIPITATION INTENSITY; SAMPLING BIAS; WEATHER FORECASTING;

CANADA;

EID: 84945958945     PISSN: 08948755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00754.1     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Adamowski, K., Y. Alila, and P. J. Pilon, 1996: Regional rainfall distribution for Canada. Atmos. Res., 42, 75-88, doi:10.1016/0169-8095(95)00054-2.
2. Alila, Y., 1999: A hierarchical approach for the regionalization of precipitation annual maxima in Canada. J. Geophys. Res., 104 (D24), 31645-31655, doi:10.1029/1999JD900764.
3. Arora, V., and Coauthors, 2011: Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05805, doi:10.1029/2010GL046270.
4. Berg, P., C. Moseley, and J. O. Haerter, 2013: Strong increase in convective precipitation in response to higher temperatures. Nat. Geosci., 6, 181-185, doi:10.1038/ngeo1731.
5. Boé, J., L. Terray, F. Habets, and E. Martin, 2007: Statistical and dynamical downscaling of the Seine basin climate for hydro-meteorological studies. Int. J. Climatol., 27, 1643-1655, doi:10.1002/joc.1602.
6. Bronaugh, D., 2014: climdex.pcic: PCIC implementation of Climdex routines. Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, R package version 1.1-1 [Available online at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package5climdex.pcic.]
7. Bürger, G., J. Schulla, and A. Werner, 2011: Estimates of future flow, including extremes, of the Columbia River headwaters. Water Resour. Res., 47, W10520, doi:10.1029/2010WR009716.
8. Bürger, G., T. Q. Murdock, A. T. Werner, S. R. Sobie, and A. J. Cannon, 2012: Downscaling extremes-An intercomparison of multiple statistical methods for present climate. J. Climate, 25, 4366-4388, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00408.1.
9. Bürger, G., S. R. Sobie, A. J. Cannon, A. T. Werner, and T. Q. Murdock, 2013: Downscaling extremes: An intercomparison of multiple methodsforfutureclimate.J.Climate, 26, 3429-3449, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00249.1.
10. Cannon, A. J., 2008: Probabilistic multisite precipitation downscaling by an expanded Bernoulli-gamma density network. J. Hydrometeor., 9, 1284-1300, doi:10.1175/2008JHM960.1.
11. Cannon, A. J., 2010: A flexible nonlinear modelling framework for nonstationary generalized extreme value analysis in hydroclimatology. Hydrol. Processes, 24, 673-685, doi:10.1002/hyp.7506.
12. Cannon, A. J., 2011: Quantile regression neural networks: Implementation in R and application to precipitation downscaling. Comput. Geosci., 37, 1277-1284, doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.07.005.
13. Cannon, A. J., 2012: Neural networks for probabilistic environmental pred iction: Conditional Density Estimation Network Creation and Evaluation (CaDENCE) in R. Comput. Geosci., 41, 126-135, doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.08.023.
14. Cannon, A. J., 2015a: An intercomparison of regional and at-site rainfall extreme value analysesin southern British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. Civ. Eng., 42, 107-119, doi:10.1139/cjce-2014-0361.
15. Cannon, A. J., 2015b: Revisiting the nonlinear relationship between ENSO and winter extreme station precipitation in North America. Int. J. Climatol.,. doi:10.1002/joc.4263,inpress.
16. Chen, J., F.P.Brissette, D.Chaumont, andM.Braun, 2013:Finding appropriate bias correction methods in downscaling precipitation for hydrologic impact studies over North America. Water Resour. Res., 49, 4187-4205, doi:10.1002/wrcr.20331.
17. Coles, S., 2001: An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values. Springer, 208 pp.
18. Deser, C., A. Phillips, V. Bourdette, and H. Teng, 2012: Uncertainty in climate change projections: The role of internal variability. Climate Dyn., 38, 527-546, doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0977-x.
19. Eden, J. M., M. Widmann, D. Grawe, and S. Rast, 2012: Skill, correction, and downscaling of GCM-simulated precipitation. J. Climate, 25, 3970-3984, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00254.1.
20. Ehret, U., E. Zehe, V. Wulfmeyer, K. Warrach-Sagi, and J. Liebert, 2012: HESS opinions: "Should we apply bias correction to global and regional climate model data?" Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3391-3404, doi:10.5194/hess-16-3391-2012.
21. Finkelstein, L., and M. Leaning, 1984: A review of the fundamental concepts of measurement. Measurement, 2, 25-34, doi:10.1016/0263-2241(84)90020-4.
22. Flato, G., and Coauthors, 2013: Evaluation of climate models. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. T. F. Stocker et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 741-866.
23. Gent, P. R., and Coauthors, 2011: The Community Climate System Model version 4. J. Climate, 24, 4973-4991, doi:10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1.
24. Gudmundsson, L., 2014: qmap: Statistical transformations for postprocessing climate model output. R package version 1.0-3 [Available online at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qmap/.]
25. Gudmundsson, L., J. Bremnes, J. Haugen, and T. Engen-Skaugen, 2012: Technical note: Downscaling RCM precipitation to the station scale using statistical transformations-A comparison of methods. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3383-3390, doi:10.5194/hess-16-3383-2012.
26. Gutmann, E., T. Pruitt, M. P. Clark, L. Brekke, J. R. Arnold, D. A. Raff, and R. M. Rasmussen, 2014: An intercomparison of statistical downscaling methods used for water resource assessments in the United States. Water Resour. Res., 50, 7167-7186, doi:10.1002/2014WR015559.
27. Hagemann, S., C. Chen, J. O. Haerter, J. Heinke, D. Gerten, and C. Piani, 2011: Impact of a statistical bias correction on the projected hydrological changes obtained from three GCMs and two hydrology models. J. Hydrometeor., 12, 556-578, doi:10.1175/2011JHM1336.1.
28. Hempel, S., K. Frieler, L. Warszawski, J. Schewe, and F. Piontek, 2013: A trend-preserving bias correction-The ISI-MIP approach. Earth System Dyn., 4, 219-236, doi:10.5194/esd-4-219-2013.
29. Hopkinson, R. F., D. W. McKenney, E. J. Milewska, M. F. Hutchinson, P. Papadopol, and L. A. Vincent, 2011: Impact of aligning climatological day on gridding daily maximum-minimum temperature and precipitation over Canada. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 50, 1654-1665, doi:10.1175/2011JAMC2684.1.
30. IPCC, 2013: Annex I: Atlas of global and regional climate projections (and RCP8.5 supplementary material). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, T. F. Stocker et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 1311-1393. [Available online at http://www.climatechange2013.org/report/full-report/.]
31. Kendon, E. J., N. M. Roberts, H. J. Fowler, M. J. Roberts, S. C. Chan, and C. A. Senior, 2014: Heavier summer downpours with climate change revealed by weather forecast resolution model. Nat. Climate Change, 4, 570-576, doi:10.1038/nclimate2258.
32. Kharin, V. V., F. W. Zwiers, X. Zhang, and G. C. Hegerl, 2007: Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations. J. Climate, 20, 1419-1444, doi:10.1175/JCLI4066.1.
33. Kharin, V. V., F. W. Zwiers, X. Zhang, and M. Wehner, 2013: Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Climatic Change, 119, 345-357, doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0705-8.
34. Koenker, R., and F. Schorfheide, 1994: Quantile spline models for global temperature change. Climatic Change, 28, 395-404, doi:10.1007/BF01104081.
35. Koutsoyiannis, D., 2004: Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: I. Theoretical investigation. Hydrol. Sci. J., 49, 575-590, doi:10.1623/hysj.49.4.575.54430.
36. Li, C., E. Sinha, D. E. Horton, N. S. Diffenbaugh, and A. M. Michalak, 2014: Joint bias correction of temperature and precipitation in climate model simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 13 153-13 162, doi:10.1002/2014JD022514.
37. Li, H., J. Sheffield, and E. F. Wood, 2010: Bias correction of monthly precipitation and temperature fields from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 models using equidistant quantile matching. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D10101, doi:10.1029/2009JD012882.
38. Maraun, D., 2012: Nonstationarities of regional climate model biases in European seasonal mean temperature and precipitation sums. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06706, doi:10.1029/2012GL051210.
39. Maraun, D., 2013: Bias correction, quantile mapping, and downscaling: Revisiting the inflation issue. J. Climate, 26, 2137-2143, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00821.1.
40. Maraun, D., and M. Widmann, 2015: The representation of location by regional climate models in complex terrain. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 12, 3011-3028, doi:10.5194/hessd-12-3011-2015.
41. Maraun, D., and Coauthors, 2010: Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev. Geophys., 48, RG3003, doi:10.1029/2009RG000314.
42. Martins, E. S., and J. R. Stedinger, 2000: Generalized maximumlikelihood generalized extreme-value quantile estimators for hydrologic data. Water Resour. Res., 36, 737-744, doi:10.1029/1999WR900330.
43. Maurer, E. P., and H. Hidalgo, 2008: Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: An intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 551-563, doi:10.5194/hess-12-551-2008.
44. Maurer, E. P., and D. W. Pierce, 2014: Bias correction can modify climate model simulated precipitation changes without adverse effect on the ensemble mean. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 915-925, doi:10.5194/hess-18-915-2014.
45. Maurer, E. P., H. Hidalgo, T. Das, M. Dettinger, and D. Cayan, 2010: The utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily streamflow in California. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1125-1138, doi:10.5194/hess-14-1125-2010.
46. McKenney, D. W., and Coauthors, 2011: Customized spatial climate models for North America. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 1611-1622, doi:10.1175/2011BAMS3132.1.
47. Mearns, L. O., and Coauthors, 2012: The North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program: Overview of phase I results. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 1337-1362, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00223.1.
48. Muerth, M., and Coauthors, 2013: On the need for bias correction in regional climate scenarios to assess climate change impacts on river runoff. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1189-1204, doi:10.5194/hess-17-1189-2013.
49. O'Gorman, P. A., 2012: Sensitivity of tropical precipitation extremes to climate change. Nat. Geosci., 5, 697-700, doi:10.1038/ngeo1568.
50. O'Gorman, and C. Muller, 2010: How closely do changes in surface and column water vapor follow Clausius-Clapeyron scaling in climate change simulations? Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 025207, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025207.
51. Olsson, J., K. Berggren, M. Olofsson, and M. Viklander, 2009: Applying climate model precipitation scenarios for urban hydrological assessment: A case study in Kalmar City, Sweden. Atmos. Res., 92, 364-375, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.015.
52. Papalexiou, S. M., and D. Koutsoyiannis, 2013: Battle of extreme value distributions: A global survey on extreme daily rainfall. Water Resour. Res., 49, 187-201, doi:10.1029/2012WR012557.
53. Rocheta, E., J. P. Evans, and A. Sharma, 2014: Assessing atmospheric bias correction for dynamical consistency using potential vorticity. Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 124010, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/12/124010.
54. Sillmann, J., V. Kharin, X. Zhang, F. Zwiers, and D. Bronaugh, 2013: Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 1716-1733, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50203.
55. Stewart, T. R., and P. Reagan-Cirincione, 1991: Coefficients for debiasing forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 2047-2051,. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119,<2047:CFDF>2.0.CO;2.
56. Stoner, A. M., K. Hayhoe, X. Yang, and D. J. Wuebbles, 2013: An asynchronous regional regression model for statistical downscaling of daily climate variables. Int. J. Climatol., 33, 2473-2494, doi:10.1002/joc.3603.
57. Sunyer, M. A., and Coauthors, 2014: Inter-comparison of statistical downscaling methods for projection of extreme precipitation in Europe. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 11, 6167-6214, doi:10.5194/hessd-11-6167-2014.
58. Taylor, K. E., R. J. Stouffer, and G. A. Meehl, 2012: An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 485-498, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1.
59. Teichmann, C., and Coauthors, 2013: How does a regional climate model modify the projected climate change signal of the driving GCM: A study over different CORDEX regions using REMO. Atmosphere, 4, 214-236, doi:10.3390/atmos4020214.
60. Teng, J., N. Potter, F. Chiew, L. Zhang, B. Wang, J. Vaze, and J. Evans, 2015: How does bias correction of regional climate model precipitation affect modelled runoff? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 711-728, doi:10.5194/hess-19-711-2015.
61. Teutschbein, C., and J. Seibert, 2012: Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods. J. Hydrol., 456-457, 12-29, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.052.
62. Themeßl, M. J., A. Gobiet, and G. Heinrich, 2012: Empiricalstatistical downscaling and error correction of regional climate models and its impact on the climate change signal. Climatic Change, 112, 449-468, doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0224-4.
63. van Vuuren, D. P., and Coauthors, 2011: The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climatic Change, 109, 5-31, doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z.
64. Vrac, M., and P. Friederichs, 2015: Multivariate-intervariable, spatial, and temporal-bias correction. J. Climate, 28, 218-237, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00059.1.
65. Wang, L., and W. Chen, 2014: Equiratio cumulative distribution function matching as an improvement to the equidistant approach in bias correction of precipitation. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 15, 1-6, doi:10.1002/asl2.454.
66. Watanabe, M., and Coauthors, 2010: Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: Mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. J. Climate, 23, 6312-6335, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1.
67. Westra, S., L. V. Alexander, and F. W. Zwiers, 2013: Global increasing trends in annual maximum daily precipitation. J. Climate, 26, 3904-3918, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00502.1.
68. Westra, S., and Coauthors, 2014: Future changes to the intensity and frequency of short-duration extreme rainfall. Rev. Geophys., 52, 522-555, doi:10.1002/2014RG000464.
69. Willems, P., and M. Vrac, 2011: Statistical precipitation downscaling for small-scale hydrological impact investigations of climate change. J. Hydrol., 402, 193-205, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.030.
70. Wood, A. W., L. R. Leung, V. Sridhar, and D. Lettenmaier, 2004: Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Climatic Change, 62, 189-216, doi:10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013685.99609.9e.
71. Zhang, X., L. Alexander, G. C. Hegerl, P. Jones, A. Klein Tank, T. C. Peterson, B. Trewin, and F. W. Zwiers, 2011: Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Climate Change, 2, 851-870, doi:10.1002/wcc.147.