Biomass production efficiency controlled by management in temperate and boreal ecosystems

Nature Geoscience

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 843-846

  Campioli, M ^a   Vicca, S ^a   Luyssaert, S ^b   Bilcke, J ^a   Ceschia, E ^c   Chapin Iii, F S ^d   Ciais, P ^b   Fernandez Martinez M ^e,f   Malhi, Y ^g   Obersteiner, M ^h   Olefeldt, D ⁱ   Papale, D ^j   Piao, S L ^k,l   Penuelas J ^e,f   Sullivan, P F ^m   Wang, X ^k   Zenone, T ^a,n   Janssens, I A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^c CESBIO   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

^e CSIC   (Spain)

^f CREAF   (Spain)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^h INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^k PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^l INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^m UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; BELOWGROUND BIOMASS; BIOMASS; BOREAL FOREST; DATABASE; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; MANAGEMENT; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT;

EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 84945946383     PISSN: 17520894     EISSN: 17520908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2553     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Luyssaert, S. et al. CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2509-2537 (2007).
2. Vicca, S. et al. Fertile forests produce biomass more e-ciently. Ecol. Lett. 15, 520-526 (2012).
3. Waring, R. H., Landsberg, J. J. &Williams, M. Net primary production of forests: A constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiol. 18, 129-134 (1998).
4. DeLucia, E. H., Drake, J. E., Thomas, R. B. & Gonzalez-Meler, M. Forest carbon use e-ciency: Is respiration a constant fraction of gross primary production? Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1157-1167 (2007).
5. Forrester, D. I. Growth responses to thinning, pruning and fertiliser application in Eucalyptus plantations: A review of their production ecology and interactions. For. Ecol. Manage. 310, 336-347 (2013).
6. Aerts, R. & Chapin, F. S. III in Advances in Ecological Research Vol. 30 (eds Fittter, A. H. & Ra-Aelli, D. G.) 1-67 (Academic, 2000).
7. Heinemeyer, A. et al. Exploring the overflow tap theory: Linking forest soil CO2 fluxes and individual mycorrhizosphere components to photosynthesis. Biogeosciences 9, 79-95 (2012).
8. Litton, C. M., Raich, J.W. & Ryan, M. G. Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2089-2109 (2007).
9. Treseder, K. K. A meta-Analysis of mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen, phosphorus, and atmospheric CO2 in field studies. New Phytol. 164, 347-355 (2004).
10. Colgan, W., Carey, A. B., Trappe, J. M., Molina, R. & Thysell, D. Diversity and productivity of hypogeous fungal sporocarps in a variably thinned Douglas-fir forest. Can. J. For. Res. 29, 1259-1268 (1999).
11. Buée, M., Vairelles, D. & Garbaye, J. Year-round monitoring of diversity and potential metabolic activity of the ectomycorrhizal community in a beech (Fagus silvatica) forest subjected to two thinning regimes. Mycorrhiza 15, 235-245 (2005).
12. Mosca, E., Montecchio, L., Scattolin, L. & Garbaye, J. Enzymatic activities of three ectomycorrhizal types of Quercus robur L. in relation to tree decline and thinning. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 2897-2904 (2007).
13. Magnani, F. et al. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature 447, 848-850 (2007).
14. Rocha, A. V. & Goulden, M. L.Why is marsh productivity so high? New insights from eddy covariance and biomass measurements in a Typha marsh. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 159-168 (2009).
15. Landsberg, J. J. &Waring, R. H. A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use e-ciency, carbon balance and partitioning. For. Ecol. Manage. 95, 209-228 (1997).
16. Running, S.W. & Coughlan, J. C. A general-model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. 1. Hydrological balance, canopy gas-exchange and primary production processes. Ecol. Model. 42, 125-154 (1988).
17. Krinner, G. et al. A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB1015 (2005).
18. Aber, J. D., Melillo, J. M., Nadelhoer, K. J., McClaugherty, C. A. & Pastor, J. Fine roots turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to quantity and form of nitrogen availability-A comparison of 2 methods. Oecologia 66, 317-321 (1985).
19. Baret, F., Olioso, A. & Luciani, J. L. Root biomass fraction as a function of growth degree days in wheat. Plant Soil 140, 137-144 (1992).
20. Batjes, N. H. ISRIC-WISE Global Data Set of Derived Soil Properties on a 0.5 by 0.5 Degree Grid (Version 3.0)Report 2005/08 (ISRIC-World Soil Information, 2005).
21. Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965-1978 (2005).
22. Dentener, F. J. Global Maps of Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition, 1860, 1993, and 2050 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, 2006); http://www.daac.ornl.gov
23. Galloway, J. N. et al. Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70, 153-226 (2004).
24. Holland, E. A., Braswell, B. H., Sulzman, J. & Lamarque, J. F. Nitrogen deposition onto the United States and western Europe: Synthesis of observations and models. Ecol. Appl. 15, 38-57 (2005).
25. Holland, E. A., Braswell, B. H., Sulzman, J. M. & Lamarque, J. F. Nitrogen Deposition onto the United States andWestern Europe (Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, 2005); http://www.daac.ornl.gov
26. Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J. & Lister, D. H. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations-Dhe CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623-642 (2014).
27. Jones, P. D. & Harris, I. CRU TS3.10: Climatic Research Unit (CRU)Time-Series (TS) Version 3.10 of High Resolution Gridded Data of Month-by-Month Variation in Climate (Jan. 1901-Dec. 2009)(University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre, 2013).
28. Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J. & van Genuchten, M. T. ROSETTA: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J. Hydrol. 251, 163-176 (2001).
29. Campioli, M., Leblans, N. & Michelsen, A. Stem secondary growth of tundra shrubs: Impact of environmental factors and relationships with apical growth. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 44, 16-25 (2012).
30. Agresti, A. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis (Wiley, 2002).
31. Team, R. D. C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013).
32. Zeileis, A. Object-oriented computation of sandwich estimators. J. Stat. Softw. 16, 9 (2006).
33. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5-32 (2001).
34. Liaw, A. &Wiener, M. Classification and regression by Random Forest. R News 2/3, 18-22 (2002).