Greenbelts in Germany's regional plans-An effective growth management policy?

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 145, Issue , 2016, Pages 71-82

  Siedentop, Stefan ^a   Fina, Stefan ^b   Krehl, Angelika ^a  

^a Germany   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Greenbelt; Growth management; Regional planning; Urban growth; Urban sprawl

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; PLANNING; REGIONAL PLANNING;

EVALUATION; GREENBELT; GROWTH MANAGEMENT; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; UNDEVELOPED AREAS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURES; URBAN SPRAWL;

URBAN GROWTH;

GIS; GREENBELT; LAND USE CHANGE; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; OPEN SPACE; REGIONAL PLANNING; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN POLICY;

GERMANY;

EID: 84945551388     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ahern J. Greenways as a planning strategy. Landscape and Urban Planning 1995, 33(1-3):131-155. 10.1016/0169-2046(95)02039-V.
2. Amati M., Yokohari M. Temporal changes and local variations in the functions of London's green belt. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 75(2):125-142. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.12.007.
3. Bae C.-H.C. Korea's greenbelts: Impacts and options for change. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 1998, 7(3):479-502.
4. Bae C.-H.C., Jun M.-J. Counterfactual planning: What if there had been no greenbelt in Seoul?. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2003, 22(4):374-383. 10.1177/0739456X03022004004.
5. Bengston D.N., Youn Y.-C. Urban containment policies and the protection of natural areas: The case of Seoul's greenbelt. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(1):3. Retrieved from 〈http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art3/〉.
6. Raumordnungsinstrumente zur Flächenverbrauchsreduktion. Handelbare Flächenausweisungsrechte in der räumlichen Planung 2011, Nomos, Baden-Baden. K. Bizer, K. Einig, W. Köck, S. Siedentop (Eds.).
7. Bramley G., Watkins D. 'Measure twice, cut once'-Revisiting the strength and impact of local planning regulation of housing development in England. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2014, 41(5):863-884. 10.1068/b39131.
8. Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung & Bundesamt für Naturschutz Kulturlandschaften gestalten! Zum zukünftigen Umgang mit Transformationsprozessen in der Raum- und Landschaftsplanung 2011, Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung & Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn.
9. Campaign to Protect Rural England & Natural England Green belts: A greener future. A report by Natural England and the Campaign to Protect Rural England. London, Sheffield 2010.
10. Carruthers J.I. Evaluating the effectiveness of regulatory growth management programs: An analytic framework. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2002, 21(4):391-405. 10.1177/0739456X0202100404.
11. Carruthers J.I. The impacts of state growth management programmes: A comparative analysis. Urban Studies 2002, 39(11):1959-1982. 10.1080/0042098022000011317.
12. Carruthers J.I., Ulfarsson G.F. Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2003, 30(4):503-522. 10.1068/b12847.
13. Couch C., Karecha J. Controlling urban sprawl: Some experiences from Liverpool. Cities 2006, 23(5):353-363. 10.1016/j.cities.2006.05.003.
14. Dawkins C.J., Nelson A.C. Urban containment policies and housing prices: An international comparison with implications for future research. Land Use Policy 2002, 19(1):1-12. 10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00038-2.
15. Dempsey J.A., Plantinga A.J. How well do urban growth boundaries contain development?: Results for Oregon using a difference-in-difference estimator. Region Science and Urban Economics 2013, 43(6):996-1007. 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.10.002.
16. Dielemann F.M., Dijst M.J., Split T. Planning the compact city: The Randstadt Holland experience. European Planning Studies 1999, 7(5):605-621. 10.1080/09654319908720541.
17. Distelkamp M., Mohr K., Siedentop S., Ulrich P. 30-ha-Ziel realisiert - Konsequenzen des Szenarios Flächenverbrauchsreduktion auf 30ha im Jahr 2020 für die Siedlungsentwicklung 2011, Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, Berlin, (Forschungen Heft 148).
18. Domhardt H.-J., Braun S., Proske M., Scheck C., Schiller H., Theis M. Freiraumschutz in Regionalplänen. Hinweise für eine zukunftsfähige inhaltliche und strukturelle Ausgestaltung 2006, Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Bonn.
19. Einig K., Jonas A., Zaspel B. Evaluierung von Regionalplänen. Raumordnungsinstrumente zur Flächenverbrauchsreduktion. Handelbare Flächenausweisungsrechte in der räumlichen Planung 2011, 65-126. Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden. K. Bizer, K. Einig, W. Köck, S. Siedentop (Eds.).
20. Evers D., Ben-Zadok E., Faludi A. The Netherlands and Florida: Two growth management strategies. International Planning Studies 2000, 5(1):7-23. 10.1080/135634700111792.
21. Fábos J.G. Greenway planning in the United States: Its origins and recent case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 68(2-3):321-342. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.07.003.
22. Fina S., Siedentop S. Steuerung der Siedlungs- und Verkehrsflächenentwicklung mit negativplanerischen Instrumenten-Analyse und Bewertung des Instrumenteneinsatzes in vier Modellregionen. Land use economics and planning-Discussion paper no. 09-10 2009, University of Goettingen, Goettingen.
23. Finke L., Reinkober G., Siedentop S., Strotkemper B. Berücksichtigung ökologischer Belange in der Regionalplanung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1993, Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, Hannover.
24. Gennaio M.-P., Hersperger A.M., Bürgi M. Containing urban sprawl-Evaluating effectiveness of urban growth boundaries set by the Swiss Land Use Plan. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(2):224-232. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.02.010.
25. Gobster P.H., Westphal L.M. The human dimensions of urban greenways: Planning for recreation and related experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 68(2-3):147-165. 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00162-2.
26. Haase A., Kabisch S., Steinführer A., Bouzarovski S., Hall R., Ogden P. Emergent spaces of reurbanisation: Exploring the demographic dimension of inner-city residential change in a European setting. Population, Space and Place 2010, 16(5):443-463. 10.1002/psp.603.
27. Hortas-Rico M., Solé-Ollé A. Does urban sprawl increase the costs of providing local public services? Evidence from Spanish municipalities. Urban Studies 2010, 49(7):1513-1540. 10.1177/0042098009353620.
28. Jun M.-J. The effects of Portland's urban growth boundary on urban development patterns and commuting. Urban Studies 2004, 41(7):1333-1348. 10.1080/0042098042000214824.
29. Korthals Altes W.K. Stagnation in housing production: Another success in the Dutch 'planner's paradise'?. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2006, 33(1):97-114. 10.1068/b31192.
30. Kühn M. Greenbelt and green heart: Separating and integrating landscapes in European city regions. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 64(1-2):19-27. 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00198-6.
31. Kursawe S. Der Regionale Grünzug und seine Bedeutung für den Freiraumschutz 1992, Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern.
32. Landis J.D. Growth management revisited: Efficacy, price effects, and displacement. Journal of the American Planning Association 2006, 72(4):411-430. 10.1080/01944360608976763.
33. Laurian L., Crawford J., Day M., Kouwenhoven P., Mason G., Ericksen N., et al. Evaluating the outcomes of plans: Theory, practice, and methodology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2010, 37(4):740-757. 10.1068/b35051.
34. Lee C.-M. An intertemporal efficiency test of a greenbelt: Assessing the economic impacts of Seoul's greenbelt. Journal of Planning Education and Research 1999, 19(1):41-52. 10.1177/0739456X9901900104.
35. Millward H. Urban containment strategies: A case-study appraisal of plans and policies in Japanese, British, and Canadian cities. Land Use Policy 2006, 23(4):473-485. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.02.004.
36. Nelson A.C. Comparing states with and without growth management: Analysis based on indicators with policy implications. Land Use Policy 1999, 16(2):121-127. 10.1016/S0264-8377(99)00009-5.
37. Nelson A.C., Sanchez T.W. The effectiveness of urban containment regimes in reducing exurban sprawl. DISP 2005, (160):42-47. 10.1080/02513625.2005.10556905.
38. Compact city policies. A comparative assessment 2012, OECD, OECD Publishing, Paris.
39. Ogura L.M. Effects of urban growth controls on intercity commuting. Urban Studies 2010, 47(10):2173-2193. 10.1177/0042098009356126.
40. Pahl-Weber E., Henckel D. The planning system and planning terms in Germany. A glossary 2008, Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, Hannover.
41. Paulsen K. The effects of growth management on the spatial extent of urban development, revisited. Land Economics 2013, 89(2):193-210. 10.3368/le.89.2.193.
42. Pendall R. Do land-use controls cause sprawl?. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1999, 26(4):555-571. 10.1068/b260555.
43. Pendall R., Martin J., Fulton W. Holding the line: Urban containment in the United States 2002, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
44. Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung Mehr Wert für die Fläche: Das "Ziel-30-ha" für die Nachhaltigkeit in Stadt und Land 2004, Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung, Berlin.
45. Schmidt S., Siedentop S., Fina S. Post-socialist sprawl: A cross-country comparison. European Planning Studies 2015, 23(7):1357-1380. 10.1080/09654313.2014.933178.
46. Schumacher F. Köln. Entwicklungsfragen einer Groszstadt 1923, Saaleck-Verlag, Köln.
47. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung Berliner Pläne 1862-1994 2002, Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung, Berlin.
48. Siedentop S. Wirksamkeit raumordnerischer Instrumente zur Erhaltung einer ressourcenschonenden Siedlungsstruktur-Versuch einer Bilanz. Raumordnungsplanung quo vadis? Zwischen notwendiger Flankierung der kommunalen Bauleitplanung und unzulässigem Durchgriff 2012, 63-83. Kommunal- und Schulverlag, Wiesbaden. O. Steger, A. Bunzel (Eds.).
49. Siedlungsverband Ruhrkohlenbezirk Gebietsentwicklungsplan 1966. Zeichnerische Darstellung, Textliche Darstellung, Erläuterungsbericht. Schriftenreihe Siedlungsverband Ruhrkohlenbezirk 1967, W. Kohlhammer Verlag, Köln, Nr. 5.
50. Tang B.-S., Wong S.-W., Lee A.K.-W. Green belt in a compact city: A zone for conservation or transition?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 79(3-4):358-373. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.04.006.
51. Turok I., Mykhnenko V. Resurgent European cities?. Urban Research & Practice 2008, 1(1):54-77. 10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.007.
52. Wassmer R.W. The influence of local urban containment policies and statewide growth management on the size of United States urban areas. Journal of Regional Science 2006, 46(1):25-65. 10.1111/j.0022-4146.2006.00432.x.
53. Woo M., Guldmann J.-M. Impacts of urban containment policies on the spatial structure of US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies 2011, 48(16):3511-3536. 10.1177/0042098011399594.
54. Yang J., Jinxing Z. The failure and success of greenbelt program in Beijing. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2007, 6(4):287-296. 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.02.001.