How to Shape a Better Future? Epistemic Difficulties for Ethical Assessment and Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1027-1047

  Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel ^a   Stahl, Bernd Carsten ^b   Fairweather, N Ben ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anticipatory governance; Emerging technologies; Empirical ethics; Epistemology; Evidence based policy; Habermas; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945477785     PISSN: 13862820     EISSN: 15728447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10677-015-9582-8     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ahmed A, Skogh G (2006) Choices at various levels of uncertainty: an experimental test of the restated diversification theorem. J Risk Uncertain 33:183–196. doi:10.1007/s11166-006-0332-0
2. Baldwin C (2008) Family carers, ethics and dementia: an empirical study. In: Widdershoven G (ed) Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 107–122
3. Banks G (2009) Evidence-based policy making: what is it? How do we get it? Productivity Commission Canberra
4. Birnbacher D (1999) Ethics and social science: which kind of co-operation? Ethical Theory Moral Pract 2:319–336. doi:10.1023/A:1009903815157
5. Black M (1964) The gap between “is” and “should”. Philos Rev 73:165. doi:10.2307/2183334
6. Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K (2004) What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis. Med Health Care Philos 7:41–53. doi:10.1023/B:MHEP.0000021844.57115.9d
7. Brey P (2011) Anticipatory technology ethics for emerging IT. CEPE 2011 Crossing boundaries
8. Cagnin C, Keenan M, Johnston R et al (2008) Future-oriented technology analysis: strategic intelligence for an innovative economy. Springer
9. Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. Macmillan, Palgrave
10. Cuhls K (2003) From forecasting to foresight processes—new participative foresight activities in Germany. J Forecast 22:93–111. doi:10.1002/for.848
11. De Vries M, Gordijn B (2009) Empirical ethics and its alleged meta-ethical fallacies. Bioethics 23:193–201. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01710.x
12. Department of Health (2011) Whole system demonstrator programme - headline findings - December 2011
13. Dusek V (2006) Philosophy of technology: an introduction. Blackwell Publishing
14. Floridi L (2010) The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics. Cambridge University Press
15. Freestone D (1991) The precautionary principle. In: Churchill R, Freestone D (eds) Int. Law Glob. Clim. Change. Graham and Trotman, London, p 447
16. Friedman B, Kahn P, Borning A (2008) Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Himma K, Tavani H (eds) Handb. Inf. Comput. Ethics. Wiley Blackwell, pp 69–102
17. Gardiner SM (2006) A core precautionary principle. J Polit Philos 14:33–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00237.x
18. Genus A, Coles A (2005) On constructive technology assessment and limitations on public participation in technology assessment. Tech Anal Strat Manag 17:433–443. doi:10.1080/09537320500357251
19. Georghiu L (2008) The handbook of technology foresight: concepts and practice. Edward Elgar Publishing
20. Goodin RE (1983) Political theory and public policy. University of Chicago Press
21. Grunwald A (2009) Technology assessment: concepts and methods. Handb. Philos. Sci. 9
22. Habermas J (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
23. Habermas J (1991) Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
24. Habermas J (1992) Moral consciousness and communicative action. The MIT Press
25. Habermas J (1997) Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, new ed. Polity Press
26. Habermas J (1998) The inclusion of the other: studies in political theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge
27. Habermas J (2008) Between naturalism and religion: philosophical essays. Polity
28. Habermas J (2011) “The political”: the rational meaning of a questionable inheritance of political theology. Power Relig. Public Sphere. Columbia University Press, pp 15–33
29. Heng MSH, De Moor A (2003) From Habermas’s communicative theory to practice on the internet. Inf Syst J 13:331–352. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2003.00144.x
30. Hildebrandt M, de Vries K (eds) (2013) Privacy, due process and the computational turn: the philosophy of law meets the philosophy of technology (Hardback) - Routledge. Routledge
31. Hongladarom S (2005) Electronic surveillance in the workplace: a Buddhist perspective. Electron. Monit. Workplace Controv. Solut. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp 208–225
32. Hourdequin M (2007) Doing, allowing, and precaution. Environ Ethics 29:339
33. Hughes J (2006) How not to criticize the precautionary principle. J Med Philos 31:447–464. doi:10.1080/03605310600912642
34. Hume D (2004) A treatise of human nature: being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. Penguin Classics
35. John S (2010) In defence of bad science and irrational policies: an alternative account of the precautionary principle. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 13:3–18
36. Jonas H (1984) Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
37. Jordan A, O’Riordan T (1999) The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental policy and politics. Prot. Public Health Environ. Implement. Precautionary Princ. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 15–35
38. Joss S, Bellucci S (2002) Participatory technology assessment: European perspectives. Centre for the Study of Democracy, University of Westminster, London
39. Kant I (1827) Kritik der praktischen Vernunft
40. Kant I (1870) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. L. Heimann
41. Keynes JM (1921) Treatise on probability. Macmillan, London
42. Klein HK, Huynh MQ (2004) The critical social theory of Jürgen Habermas and its implications for IS research. Soc. Theory Philos. Inf. Syst. Wiley, Chichester, pp 157–237
43. Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Miflin, Boston
44. Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University press
45. Latour B, Venn C (2002) Morality and technology the end of the means. Theory Cult Soc 19:247–260. doi:10.1177/026327602761899246
46. Leget C, Borry P, De Vries M (2009) “Nobody tosses a dwarf!” The relation between the empirical and the normative reexamined. Bioethics 23:226–235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01711.x
47. Lyytinen K, Hirschheim R (1988) Information systems as rational discourse: an application of Habermas’s theory of communicative action. Scand J Manag 4:19–30. doi:10.1016/0956-5221(88)90013-9
48. Magnani L (2007) Morality in a technological world: knowledge as duty. Cambridge University Press
49. McMillan JH (2008) The possibility of empirical psychiatric ethics. In: Widdershoven G (ed) Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 9–22
50. Mill JS (2002) Utilitarianism, 2nd revised. Hackett Publishing Co, Inc
51. Mingers J, Walsham G (2010) Toward ethical information systems: the contribution of discourse ethics. MIS Q 34:833–854
52. Mittelstadt B (2013) On the ethical implications of personal health monitoring: a conceptual framework for emerging discourses. De Montfort University
53. Molewijk AC, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W et al (2003) Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Anal 11:69–92
54. Moore GE (1993) Principia ethica: with the preface to the second edition and other papers. Cambridge University Press
55. Morris J (2000) Rethinking risk and the precautionary principle. Butterworth-Heinemann
56. Mumford E (1996) Systems design: ethical tools for ethical change. Macmillan
57. Mumford E (2003) Redesigning human systems. Idea Group Inc (IGI)
58. Musschenga AW (2005) Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism. J Med Philos 30:467–490
59. Pantelopoulos A, Bourbakis NG (2010) A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 40:1–12. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2032660
60. Popper KR (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books, Oxford
61. Reuzel RPB, van der Wilt GJ, ten Have HAMJ, de Vries Robbé PF (2001) Interactive technology assessment and wide reflective equilibrium. J Med Philos 26:245–261. doi:10.1076/jmep.26.3.245.3015
62. Roncaglia A (2009) Keynes and probability: an assessment. Eur J Hist Econ Thought 16:489–510
63. Sandberg A (1985) Socio-technical design, trade union strategies and action research. In: Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G, Wood-Harper T (eds) Res. Methods Inf. Syst. IFIPColloquium Proc. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 79–92
64. Searle J (1964) How to derive “ought” from “is.”. Philos Rev 73:43. doi:10.2307/2183201
65. Sinn H-W (1980) A rehabilitation of the principle of insufficient reason. Q J Econ 94:493–506. doi:10.2307/1884581
66. Smith A (2007) The theory of moral sentiments - Adam Smith. Standard Publications, Inc
67. Tran TA, Daim T (2008) A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 75:1396–1405. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.004
68. UNCED (1992) Rio Declaration on Environment and Development - United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). http://www.unep.org/Documents.multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=78&ArticleID=1163. Accessed 23 Nov 2012
69. Van Eijndhoven J, van Est R (2002) The choice of participative technology assessment methods. In: Joss S, Belucci S (eds) Particip. Technol. Assess. Eur. Perspect. Centre for the Study of Democracy, University of Westminster, London, pp 209 – 234
70. Van Hooren RH, Van der Borne HW, Curfs LMG, Widdershoven GAM (2008) Providing good care in the context of restrictive measures: the case of prevention of obesity in youngsters with Prader-Willi syndrome. In: Widdershoven G (ed) Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 153–171
71. Wagner WE (2003) The“bad science” fiction: reclaiming the debate over the role of science in public health and environmental regulation. Law Contemp Probl 66:63–133
72. Widdershoven G, Abma T, Molewijk AC (2009) Empirical ethics as dialogical practice. Bioethics 23:236–248
73. Wingspread Statement (1998) The precautionary principle