Integrating isolated and riparian wetland modules in the PHYSITEL/HYDROTEL modelling platform: Model performance and diagnosis

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 29, Issue 22, 2015, Pages 4683-4702

  Fossey, Maxime ^a   Rousseau, Alain N ^a   Bensalma, Fatima ^a,b   Savary, Stéphane ^a   Royer, Alain ^a  

^a CENTRE EAU TERRE ENVIRONNEMENT   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Extension module; HYDROTEL; Model evaluation; PHYSITEL; Sensitivity analysis; Wetlands

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE MODELS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; INTEGRATION; RIVERS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STREAM FLOW; WATERSHEDS;

DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; EXTENSION MODULE; HYDROTEL; ISOLATED WETLANDS; MODEL EVALUATION; MODEL PERFORMANCE; PHYSITEL; WATERSHED HYDROLOGY;

WETLANDS;

GIS; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; STREAMFLOW; WATERSHED; WETLAND;

BECANCOUR RIVER; CANADA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 84945475571     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10534     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ames DP, Rafn EB, Van Kirk R, Crosby B. 2009. Estimation of stream channel geometry in Idaho using GIS-derived watershed characteristics. Environmental Modelling & Software 24(3): 444-448.
2. Arega F. 2013. Hydrodynamic modeling and characterizing of Lagrangian flows in the West Scott Creek wetlands system, South Carolina. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research 7(1): 50-60.
3. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part 1: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1): 73-89.
4. Beaulieu J, Murray S, Villeneuve C. 2012. Cartographie détaillée des milieux humides du territoire du centre du Québec - rapport de synthèse. Canards Illimités - bureau du Québec et le ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et des parcs. Québec. 44 p
5. Biondi D, Freni G, Iacobellis V, Mascaro G, Montanari A. 2012. Validation of hydrological models: conceptual basis, methodological approaches and a proposal for a code of practice. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 42-44: 70-76.
6. Bouda M, Rousseau AN, Gumiere SJ, Gagnon P, Konan B, Moussa R. 2014. Implementation of an automatic calibration procedure for HYDROTEL based on prior OAT sensitivity and complementary identifiability analysis. Hydrological Processes 28(12): 3947-3961.
7. Bouda M, Rousseau AN, Konan B, Gagnon P, Gumiere SJ. 2012. Case study: Bayesian uncertainty analysis of the distributed hydrological model HYDROTEL. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 17(9): 1021-1032.
8. Brinson MM. 2011. Wetlands: integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Chapter 5, classification of wetlands. 96-110.
9. Brooks R, Brinson M, Havens K, Hershner C, Rheinhardt R, Wardrop D, Whigham D, Jacobs A, Rubbo J. 2011. Proposed hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands of the mid-Atlantic region, USA. Wetlands 31(2): 207-219.
10. Buteau P, Dignard N, Grondin P. 1994. Système de classification des milieux humides du Québec. Ministère des Ressources naturelles, Secteur des Mines. 25 p
11. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service: Washington, D.C.; 131.
12. Criss RE, Winston WE. 2008. Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals. Hydrological Processes 22(14): 2723-2725.
13. Dall'O' M, Kluge W, Bartels F. 2001. FEUWAnet: a multi-box water level and lateral exchange model for riparian wetlands. Journal of Hydrology 250(1-4): 40-62.
14. Fortin J-P, Turcotte R, Massicotte S, Moussa R, Fitzback J, Villeneuve J. 2001. Distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data, part I: description of the model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 6(2): 91-99.
15. Golden HE, Lane CR, Amatya DM, Bandilla KW, Raanan Kiperwas H, Knightes CD, Ssegane H. 2014. Hydrologic connectivity between geographically isolated wetlands and surface water systems: a review of select modeling methods. Environmental Modelling & Software 53: 190-206.
16. Hattermann FF, Krysanova V, Habeck A, Bronstert A. 2006. Integrating wetlands and riparian zones in river basin modelling. Ecological Modelling 199(4): 379-392.
17. Keddy PA. 2010. Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation, 2nd edition. Cambrigde University Press: New York; 497.
18. Le Moine N. 2008. Le bassin versant de surface vu par le souterrain: une voie d'amélioration des performances et du réalisme des modèles pluie-débit ? PhD Thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Anthony, 324 pp.
19. Liu Y, Yang W, Wang X. 2008. Development of a SWAT extension module to simulate riparian wetland hydrologic processes at a watershed scale. Hydrological Processes 22(16): 2901-2915.
20. Mailhot A, Villeneuve JP. 2003. Mean-value second-order uncertainty analysis method: application to water quality modelling. Advances in Water Resources 26(5): 491-499.
21. Martinez-Martinez E, Nejadhashemi AP, Woznicki SA, Love BJ. 2014. Modeling the hydrological significance of wetland restoration scenarios. Journal of Environmental Management 133: 121-134.
22. Middleton BA. 2002. Flood Pulsing in Wetlands: Restoring the natural Hydrological Balance. National Wetlands Research Center, USGS: Lafayette, Louisiana. New York.
23. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG. 2007. Wetlands, 4th edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc: New Jersey, NY.
24. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(3): 885-900.
25. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part I-A: discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290.
26. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR. 2005. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2005. Temple, Tex.: USDA-ARS Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory.
27. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR. 2009. Soil and water assessment tool - theoretical documentation - version 2009. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory - Blackland Research Center. Temple, Texas.
28. Nie W, Yuan Y, Kepner W, Nash MS, Jackson M, Erickson C. 2011. Assessing impacts of landuse and landcover changes on hydrology for the upper San pedro watershed. Journal of Hydrology 407(1-4): 105-114.
29. Olden JD, Poff NL. 2003. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Research and Applications 19(2): 101-121.
30. Orlandini S, Moretti G, Franchini M, Aldighieri B, Testa B. 2003. Path-based methods for the determination of nondispersive drainage directions in grid-based digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 39(6): 1144, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001639.
31. Oudin L, Andréassian V, Mathevet T, Perrin C. 2006. Dynamic averaging of rainfall-runoff model simulations from complementary model parameterizations. Water Resources Research 42(7): W07410.
32. Paudel R, Grace KA, Galloway S, Zamorano M, Jawitz JW. 2013. Effects of hydraulic resistance by vegetation on stage dynamics of a stormwater treatment wetland. Journal of Hydrology 484: 74-85.
33. Pushpalatha R, Perrin C, Moine NL, Andréassian V. 2012. A review of efficiency criteria suitable for evaluating low-flow simulations. Journal of Hydrology 420-421: 171-182.
34. Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL. 1989. Estimation of soil water retention and hydraulic properties. In Unsaturated Flow in Hydrologic Modeling: Theory and Practice, Morel-Seytoux HJ (ed), NATO ASI series. Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 275. Kluwer Academic: Boston; 275-300.
35. Reusser DE, Blume T, Schaefli B, Zehe E. 2009. Analysing the temporal dynamics of model performance for hydrological models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13: 999-1018.
36. Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Un Métro para Evaluar Alteraciones Hidrológicas dentro de Ecosistemas. Conservation Biology 10(4): 1163-1174.
37. Ritter A, Muñoz-Carpena R. 2013. Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. Journal of Hydrology 480: 33-45.
38. Rousseau AN, Fortin J-P, Turcotte R, Royer A, Savary S, Quévy F, Noël P, Paniconi C. 2011. PHYSITEL, a specialized GIS for supporting the implementation of distributed hydrological models. Water News - Official Magazine of the Canadian Water Resources Association 31(1): 18-20.
39. Savary S, Rousseau AN, Quilbé R. 2009. Assessing the effects of historical land cover changes on runoff and low flows using remote sensing and hydrological modeling. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 14(6): 575-587.
40. Singh J, Knapp HV, Demissie M. 2004. Hydrologic modeling of the iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT. ISWS CR 2004-08. Champaign, Ill.: Illinois State Water Survey. Available at: www.sws.uiuc.edu/pubdoc/CR/ISWSCR2004-08.pdf. Accessed 26 February 2014.
41. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL. 2007. Climate change 2007 - the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Climate Change 2007. Cambridge University Press (2007).
42. Tiner R. 2003. Estimated extent of geographically isolated wetlands in selected areas of the United States. Wetlands 23(3): 636-652.
43. Turcotte R, Fortin JP, Rousseau AN, Massicotte S, Villeneuve JP. 2001. Determination of the drainage structure of a watershed using a digital elevation model and a digital river and lake network. Journal of Hydrology 240(3-4): 225-242.
44. Turcotte R, Fortin LG, Fortin JP, Fortin V, Villeneuve JP. 2007. Operational analysis of the spatial distribution and the temporal evolution of the snowpack water equivalent in southern Quebec, Canada. Nordic Hydrology 38(3): 211-234.
45. Turcotte R, Rousseau AN, Fortin JP, Villeneuve JP. 2003. A processed-oriented multiple objective calibration strategy accounting for model structure. In Calibration of Watershed Models, Duan Q, Gupta VK, Sorooshian S, Rousseau AN, Turcotte R (eds). American Geophysical Union: Washington; 153-163.
46. Wang X, Shang S, Qu Z, Liu T, Melesse AM, Yang W. 2010. Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Management 91(7): 1511-1525.
47. Wang X, Yang W, Melesse AM. 2008. Using hydrological equivalent wetland concept within SWAT to estimate streamflow in watersheds with numerous wetlands. Transactions of the ASABE 51(1): 55-72.
48. Warner BG, Rubec CDA. 1997. Système de classification des terres humides du Canada. Centre de recherche sur les terres humides, Université de Waterloo: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
49. Wu K, Johnston CA. 2008. Hydrologic comparison between a forested and a wetland/lake dominated watershed using SWAT. Hydrological Processes 22(10): 1431-1442.
50. Yang W, Wang X, Gabor S, Boychuk L, Badiou P. 2008. Water quantity and quality benefits from wetland conservation and restoration in the Broughton's creek watershed. A research report submitted to Ducks Unlimited Canada.
51. Yang W, Wang X, Liu Y, Gabor S, Boychuk L, Badiou P. 2010. Simulated environmental effects of wetland restoration scenarios in a typical Canadian prairie watershed. Wetlands Ecology and Management 18(3): 269-279.
52. Yapo PO, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S. 1996. Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data. Journal of Hydrology 181(1-4): 23-48.
53. Yetter JC. 2004. Hydrology and geochemistry of freshwater wetlands on the Gulf coast of Veracruz, Dissertation. University of Waterloo: Mexico.